Predictive Factors of Difficult Spinal Anesthesia

Keywords: difficult spinal, predictive factors, spinal anesthesia.

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia was a commonly used anesthetic technique in surgical procedures, but its administration was often challenging in certain patients.

Methods: This study employed a prospective analytical observational design with a cross-sectional approach, involving 418 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia procedures at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital between October 2024 and January 2025. The analyzed variables included age, BMI, history of previous spinal injections, history of spinal surgery, visibility of the spinous process, palpability of the spinous process, lumbar anatomical abnormalities, and interspinous L3-4/L4-5 characteristics. The data were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and logistic regression.

Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated that poor visibility of the spinous process increased the likelihood of difficulty by 2.21 times (P<0.01; OR 2.21; CI 1.40-3.47), lumbar anatomical abnormalities increased the likelihood by 1.87 times (P=0.01; OR 1.87; CI 1.16-3.02), and the L3-4 interspinous space was 2.08 times more difficult to access compared to the L4-5 interspinous space (P<0.01; OR 2.08; CI 1.32-3.28). Although significant results were observed in the bivariate analysis, high BMI, moderate BMI, history of repeated spinal injections, and spinous process palpability did not demonstrate an independent effect on procedural difficulty.

Discussion: Factors such as poor spinous process visibility, lumbar anatomical abnormalities, and interspinous L3-4/L4-5 characteristics were found to be associated with difficulties in spinal anesthesia administration. These findings were consistent with previous studies indicating that spinous process visibility, lumbar anatomical abnormalities, and interspinous characteristics influenced the success of spinal anesthesia. 

References

Evans HGT, Burns D, Chin KJ. Neuraxial Blocks: Spinal and epidural anesthesia. In: Jankovic D, Peng P, editors. Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy: Imaging-guided and Traditional Techniques. 5th ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022, 565–608.

Atashkhoei S, Samudi S, Abedini N, Khoshmaram N, Minayi M. Anatomical predicting factors of difficult spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section: An observational study. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35:1707–11. Doi: doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.1276

Sugiarto A, Marpaung M. Prediksi kesulitan penempatan jarum spinal berdasarkan gambaran radiologis dan penanda anatomis pada pasien bedah urologi. Maj Anest Crit Care. 2021;39:85–95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.55497/majanestcricar.v39i2.215

Buono R Del, Pascarella G, Costa F, Terranova G, Leoni ML, Barbara E, et al. Predicting difficult spinal anesthesia: Development of a neuraxial block assessment score. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87:648–54. Doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14892-2

Yüksek A, Miniksar ÖH, Honca M, Öz H. Incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthesia. Dubai Med J. 2020;3:50–4. Doi: 10.1159/000508837

Prakash S, Mullick P, Kumar SS, Diwan S, Singh R. Factors predicting difficult spinal block: A single centre study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37(3):395–401. Doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_196_19

Subramanian S, Reshma BM, Iqbal MS, Harsoor SS. A comprehensive, bed-side scoring system to predict difficult lumbar puncture. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023;39(1): 38-44. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_21.

Karim Md RH. Difficult spinal-arachnoid puncture (DSP) score: Development and performance analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(1):1–7. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.33760.

Song IS, Yoo S, Kim JT, Seo YS, Choi Y. Anatomical changes of the ligamentum flavum and the epidural space after spinal surgery: a retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022;88(10):797–802. Doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16405-9

Published
2025-12-08
How to Cite
Bayu, T. K., Sudadi, & Wisudarti, C. F. R. (2025). Predictive Factors of Difficult Spinal Anesthesia. Jurnal Komplikasi Anestesi, 12(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.22146/jka.v12i2.20454
Section
Articles