PCD Journal
by PCD Press, Department of Politics and Government - Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
openjournathemelogo
Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

Page Header Logo

PCD Journal
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • Register
  • Login
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal History
    • Submissions
    • Publication Ethics
    • Publication Frequency
    • Publication Fee
    • Editorial Team
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • Register
  • Login
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal History
    • Submissions
    • Publication Ethics
    • Publication Frequency
    • Publication Fee
    • Editorial Team
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025

Issue Published : Nov 1, 2025

Do Santri Still Obey the Kiai?

Examining Voting Behaviour in Traditional and Modern Pesantren during the 2024 Presidential Election
https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v13i2.23363
Ayu Amanda A’isyatul Khumairo’
Ayuamandaaisyatulkhumairo@mail.ugm.ac.id

Corresponding Author(s) : Ayu Amanda A’isyatul Khumairo’

Ayuamandaaisyatulkhumairo@mail.ugm.ac.id

PCD Journal, Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025
Article Published : Nov 14, 2025

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Amid narratives of Generation Z’s heightened political awareness through internet access, this study examines a specific subset: santri in Islamic boarding schools—Muslim groups with limited access to the internet to engage in online political discourse. They are frequently characterised as merely a traditional group, and prior studies have largely attributed their political choices to the authority of the kiai (pesantren leaders). To revisit this assumption, the study was conducted in two contrasting Islamic boarding school traditions: traditional and modern. It investigates five potential influences on santri voting behaviour in Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Election: kiai, teachers (ustaz/ustazah), peer groups, political promises, and evaluations of the Joko Widodo–Ma’ruf Amin government. This study, employing mixed methods, reveals that, contrary to previous studies, kiai exert no significant influence. Instead, teachers shape political preferences through classroom discussions, which also enable students to critically evaluate the Jokowi–Ma’ruf government. These findings enhance the diversity within the field of voting behaviour studies in religion communities with limited internet access while challenging assumptions about Generation Z’s short-term political outlook. The findings also extend voting behavior theory in the context of religious communities with restricted internet access.

Keywords

Santri voting behaviour 2024 presidential election
Ayu Amanda A’isyatul Khumairo’. (2025). Do Santri Still Obey the Kiai?. PCD Journal, 13(2), 41-90. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v13i2.23363
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Achmadin, B. Z., Asrori, M., Barizi, A., Amrullah, A. M. K., & Nafis, M. M. (2024). Deconstructing the Kiai and Santri Relationship: A Critical Review of Power and Cultural Dynamics. El Harakah: Jurnal Budaya Islam, 26(2), 367–392. doi:10.18860/eh.v26i2.29573
  2. Afifuddin, A. (2016). Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Al-Qur’an: Penerapan Pola Sistematika Nuzulnya Wahyu (Snw) Di Pondok Pesantren Hidayatullah Panyula Kabupaten Bone. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 19(1), 30–41. doi:10.24252/lp.2016v19n1a3
  3. Aldrich, H., J., & Jenke, M., L. (2018). Turnout and the Calculus of Voting: Recent Advances and Prospects for Integration with Theories of Campaigns and Elections. In J. Fisher, E. Fieldhouse, M. N. Franklin, R. Gibson, M. Cantijoch, & C. Wlezien (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Abingdon, United Kingdom: The Routledge.
  4. Alkaf, M., Said, Muhammad., & Hakam, Saiful. (2022). The Authority of Ulama Towards Politics: The Role of Teungku, Tuan Guru and Kiai in Nation Below the Wind. Progresiva: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 132–152. doi:10.22219/progresiva.v11i02.22964
  5. Angrainy, F. C. (2023, August 31). Anies Kunjungi Ponpes Tebuireng Jombang: Seperti Pulang ke Rumah. Detik.com. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-6905741/anies-kunjungi-ponpes-tebuireng-jombang-seperti-pulang-ke-rumah
  6. Antaranews.com. (2023). Prabowo Subianto Ziarah ke Makam Pendiri NU di Tebuireng Jombang. Antaranews.com. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3818631/prabowo-subianto-ziarah-ke-makam-pendiri-nu-di-tebuireng-jombang
  7. Arravi, M. A., Kushandajani, & Martini, R. (2021). Partisipasi Politik dan Perilaku Memilih Santri di Wilayah Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Lasem Kabupaten Rembang dalam Pemilihan Presiden tahun 2019. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 10(3), 311–327. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/31397
  8. Arrohmah.co.id. (2024, December 7). Gelar Seminar Motivasi Ar-Rohmah Tahfizh Hadirkan Tokoh Milenial Inspiratif Gamal Albinsaid. Arrohmah.co.id. Retrieved from https://arrohmah.co.id/gelar-seminar-motivasi-ar-rohmah-tahfizh-hadirkan-tokoh-milenial-inspiratif-gamal-albinsaid/
  9. Asfar, M. (2020). Pendekatan OMNI Perilaku Memilih: Studi Perilaku Memilih Pemilu Legislatif. [Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga]. Universitas Airlangga Repository. (Unpublished).
  10. Assidiq, D. U., Ambarwati, D., & Imron, M. (2023). Perilaku Politik Pemilih Pemula Menjelang Pemilu 2024 di Kabupaten Malang. Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Education and Peace, 3, 259–267. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uniramalang.ac.id/isiep/article/view/3876
  11. Azra, A., Afrianty, D., & Hefner, W. R. (2010). Pesantren and Madrasa: Muslim Schools and National Ideals in Indonesia. In R. W. Hefner & M. Q. Zaman (Eds.), Schooling Islam: The Culture and Politics of Modern Muslim Education (pp. 172–198). Princeton, United States: Princeton University.
  12. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. In BPS.go.id (Issue 7).
  13. Barokah, F., & Kurniawan, C. R. (2024). Perilaku Politik Santri pada Pilkada Lampung Selatan tahun 2020: Studi pada Pesantren Tradisional dan Pesantren Modern. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 9(1), 21-30. doi: 10.24198/jwp.v8i1.36326
  14. Basyir, A. (2014). Ideologi Politik Dilematis Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS) antara Gerakan Tarbiyah dan Pragmatisme. Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 1(2), 153–192. doi.org/10.14421/inright.v3i2.1263
  15. Bazić, J., Trifunović, V., & Sekulic, B. (2023). Politics in the Classroom. Conference: Knowledge-International Journal Scientific Papers, 60(1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374675767_POLITICS_IN_THE_CLASSROOM
  16. Bonilla, T. (2022). The Importance of Campaign Promises. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Born, A., van Eck, P., & Johannesson, M. (2018). An Experimental Investigation of Election Promises. Political Psychology, 39(3), 685–705. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/45095198
  18. Brooks, M. C., Brooks, J. S., Mutohar, A., & Taufiq, I. (2020). Principals as Socio-Religious Curators: Progressive and Conservative Approaches in Islamic Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 677–695. doi:10.1108/JEA-01-2020-0004
  19. Bruinessen, M. van. (2019). Traditionalist and Islamist Pesantrens in Contemporary Indonesia. The Madrasa in Asia, 217–246. doi.org/10.1515/9789048501380-010
  20. Budi, A. (2024). Does Religious Identity Moderate Economic Voting? Evidence from Indonesia. Muslim Politics Review, 3(1), 4–43. doi:10.15206/ajpor.2024.12.4.214
  21. Campbell, D. E., Layman, G. C., Green, J. C., & Sumaktoyo, N. G. (2018). Putting Politics First: The Impact of Politics on American Religious and Secular Orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 551–565. doi:10.1111/ajps.12365
  22. CSIS (2022). Pemilih Muda dan Pemilu 2024: Dinamika dan Preferensi Sosial Politik Pascapandemi. CSIS. Retrieved from https://csis.or.id/publication/rilis-survei-pemilih-muda-dan-pemilu-2024-dinamika-dan-preferensi-sosial-politik-pascapandemi/
  23. Darmaji, A. (2020). Role of Santri Middle Class in Democratization Process in Indonesia. Ilmu Ushuluddin, 6(2), 107–124. doi:10.15408/iu.v6i2.13894
  24. Darmini, A. M. M. (2021). Internet and the Public Sphere in the Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools (Pondok Pesantren): Power, Piety, and the Popular [Doctoral Thesis, University of Warwick]. Retrieved from https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/164141/
  25. Darmini, Asep. (2024, February 8). Mobilisasi Politik di Pesantren: Bagaimana Keterbatasan Akses Digital dan Kuatnya Peran Kiai Menentukan Arah Dukung dalam Pemilu. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/mobilisasi-politik-di-pesantren-bagaimana-keterbatasan-akses-digital-dan-kuatnya-peran-kiai-menentukan-arah-dukungan-dalam-pemilu-220782
  26. Denver, D., & Robert, J. (2022). Elections and Voters in Britain. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Di Leo, G., & Sardanelli, F. (2020). Statistical Significance: P Value, 0.05 Threshold, and Applications to Radiomics—Reasons for a Conservative Approach. European Radiology Experimental, 4(1). doi:10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y
  28. Djupe, P. A., & Gilbert, C. P. (2009). The Political Influence of Churches. Cambridge, United Kingkom: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. doi:10.1086/257897
  30. Eichhorn, J. (2022). Survey Research and Sampling. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Ltd.
  31. Evans, G., & Ball-Northmore, K. (2018). Long-Term Factors: Class and Religious Cleavages. In J. Fisher, E. Fieldhouse, M.N. Franklin, R. Gibson, M. Cantijoch, & C. Wlezien (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (pp. 123–131). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
  32. Fauzi, M. L. (2012). The Roles of Kyai and Pesantren in Preserving Islamic Tradition and Negotiating Modernity. Journal of Indonesia Islam, 06(01), 125–144. doi:10.15642/JIIS.2012.6.1.125-144
  33. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  34. Franklin, M. N. (1995). Voting Behavior. In S. Lipset (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Democracy (Vol 4, pp. 1346–1352). Washington, DC: Michigan University.
  35. Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  36. Hafidh, Z., Zuhri, M. T., & Sandi, W. K. (2019). The Role of Kiai Leadership and Character Education: a Pattern of Santri Character Formation At Asy-Syifa Al-Qur'an Islamic Boarding School. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 1(2), 134–145. doi:10.22146/jlo.45618
  37. Halim, Fikri & Faishal, Nur. (2024, February 8). Tegaskan Netral, Pesantren Tebuireng Bantah Dukung Prabowo-Gibran. Viva.co.id. Retrieved from https://www.viva.co.id/berita/politik/1685486-tegaskan-netral-pesantren-tebuireng-bantah-dukung-prabowo-gibran
  38. Hertiana, L., Supriyadi, Sugitanata, A., & Abdurrasyied. H., M. (2024). The Dynamics of Politicians’ Silaturahmi to Kiai before Elections in Indonesia: an Analytical Study Based on Elite Theory and Siyasah Syar’Iyyah. Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 5(1), 1–24. doi: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v5i1.100
  39. Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  40. Hidayat, T., Kemal Faza, S., & Nur Zaimah, A. (2022). Pengkaderan dan Dakwah sebagai Basis Gerakan (Studi Kasus Ormas Hidayatullah). Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama, 23(1), 117–128. doi:10.19109/jia.v23i1.13026
  41. Hikmawan, M. D., Godjali, M. R., & Indriyany, I. A. (2020). Kyai and Power in Banten, Indonesia. SHS Web of Conferences, 86, 01051. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20208601051
  42. Holilah, H., Marijan, K., & Mardiyanta, A. (2024). From Tradition to Rationality: Understanding Voter Behavior in Madura's Local Elections. The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences, 3(2), 197–213. doi:10.15642/sarpass.2024.3.2.197-213
  43. Hutchings, L. V., & Jefferson, J. H. (2018). The Sociological and Social-Psychological Approaches. In J. Fisher, E. Fieldhouse, M.N. Franklin, R. Gibson, M. Cantijoch, & C. Wlezien (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (pp. 21–29). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
  44. Ismah, N. (2022). Pesantren: Its Founding and Role in the Colonial Period. Tebuireng: Journal of Islamic Studies and Society, 3(1). doi:10.33752/tjiss.v3i1.2610
  45. Jati, P. W. M. (2023). Perilaku Memilih Santri Pondok Pesantren pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019 di Yogyakarta. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 2(5), 434–441. doi:10.56799/jceki.v2i5.1755
  46. Jati, W. (2024). Preferensi Politik Pemilih Muslim Indonesia Kontemporer. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.
  47. Juma, J. (2022). Fatwa Jihad dan Resolusi Jihad: Historisitas Jihad dan Nasionalisme di Indonesia. Aqlam Journal of Islam and Plurality, 7(2), 119–134. doi:10.30984/ajip.v7i2.2187
  48. Jurado, I., & Fernández-Vázquez, P. (2022). Retrospective Voting under Supranational Constraints. Electoral Studies, 80. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102530
  49. Katadata Insight Center. (2023). Politik di Mata Anak Muda. Katadata Insight Center. Retrived from https://cdn1.katadata.co.id/media/files/2023/11/14/2023_11_14-09_29_57_b79a6291bfdc96ed7cbd51505b9ca4d8.pdf
  50. Kemenpppa.go.id. (2024, May 1). Menteri PPPA Ajak Pemilih Pemula jadi Pemilih yang Cerdas pada Pemilu 2024. Kemenpppa. Retrieved from https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/siaran-pers/menteri-pppa-ajak-pemilih-pemula-jadi-pemilih-yang-cerdas-pada-pemilu-2024
  51. Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic Politics: The American Case. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 129–161. doi:10.1017/S0007123400002544.
  52. KumparanNews. (2023, November 27). Anies Hadiri Milad 50 Hidayatullah. Dititipi Masa Depan Ponpes-Program Keagamaan. Kumparan. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/anies-hadiri-milad-50-hidayatullah-dititipi-masa-depan-ponpes-program-keagamaan-21eqYgFYnIU
  53. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  54. Levy, B. L. M., Solomon, B. G., & Collet-Gildard, L. (2016). Fostering Political Interest among Youth during the 2012 Presidential Election: Instructional Opportunities and Challenges in a Swing State. Educational Researcher, 45(9), 483–495. doi:10.3102/0013189X1668340
  55. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2009). Economic Models of Voting. In R.J. Dalton & H.D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp.1–25). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  56. Lockerbie, B. (1991). Prospective Economic Voting in U. S. House Elections, 1956-88. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(2), 239. doi:10.2307/439980
  57. Mahmud, Yuliati, D., & Alamsyah. (2023). Resistance of the Nahdlatul Ulama Party towards the New Order 1967-1969. IHiS (Indonesian Historical Studies), 7(1), 77–92. doi: 10.14710/ihis.v7i1.12720
  58. Margolis, M. F. (2018). How Politics Affects Religion: Partisanship, Socialization, and Religiosity in America. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 30–43. doi:10.1086/694688
  59. Markwat, N. (2021). The Policy-Seeking Voter: Evaluations of Government Performance Beyond the Economy. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. doi:10.1007/s43545-020-00030-4
  60. Martin, P. (2022). Regression Models for Categorical and Count Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  61. Masruri, M., Sobari, W., & Tawakkal, T. I. G. (2019). Kyai-Santri Relationship in Electoral Politics: A Critical Point of View. Memudarnya Patron-Client: Relasi Politik Elektoral Kiai dan Santri dalam Pemilihan Gubernur Jawa Timur 2018. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerint ahan), 4(2), 75–89. Retrieved from http://governmentjournal.org/index.php/jip/index
  62. Misbah, A., & Rozi, B. (2022). Sejarah Pesantren dan Tradisi Keilmuannya di Jawa. Al-Jadwa: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(2), 83–96. doi:10.38073/aljadwa.v1i2.796
  63. Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2010). Personalities, Parties, and Voters. Journal of Democracy, 21(2), 35–49. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0160
  64. Mujani, S., Liddle, R. W., & Ambardi, K. (2008). Kuasa Rakyat: Analisis Perilaku Memilih dalam Pemilihan Legislatif dan Presiden Indonesia Pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia: Mizan.
  65. Mujani, S., Liddle, R. W., & Ambardi, K. (2018). Voting Behavior in Indonesia since Democratization: Critical Democrats. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univesity Press.
  66. Morgan, D. L. (2008). Quota sampling. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  67. Nasikhin, N., & Raharjo, R. (2022). Moderasi Beragama Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah dalam Konsep Islam Nusantara dan Islam Berkemajuan. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, 11(1), 19–34. doi:10.35878/islamicreview.v11i1.371
  68. Naurin, E. (2014). Is a Promise a Promise? Election Pledge Fulfilment in Comparative Perspective Using Sweden as an Example. West European Politics, 37(5), 1046–1064. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.863518
  69. Naurin, E., Royed, T. J., & Thomson, R. (2019). Party Mandates and Democracy: Making, Breaking, and Keeping Election Pledges in Twelve Countries. United States: University of Michigan Press.
  70. Nickerson, D. W. (2008). Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 49–57. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080039
  71. Noor, L. S., Nasar, I., Novarlia, I., Anieg, M., & Zulihi, Z. (2023). Peran Kiai dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan Modern di Pondok Pesantren. At-Ta’dib, 18(1), 28–42. doi:10.21111/attadib.v18i1.9911
  72. Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  74. Plescia, C., & Kritzinger, S. (2017). Retrospective Voting and Party Support at Elections: Credit and Blame for Government and Opposition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(2), 156–171. doi:10.1080/17457289.2016.1243543
  75. Porter, J. D. (2002). Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia. London, United Kingdom: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
  76. Pramitha, D. (2020). Kepemimpinan Kyai di Pondok Pesantren Modern: Pengembangan Organisasi, Team Building, dan Perilaku Inovatif. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 147–154. doi:10.21831/jamp.v8i2.33058
  77. Pratama, Y., P., Habibi, B., M., & Ningtias, K., R. (2024). Dynamics of the Islamic Political Movement The Influence of Pesantren’s Islamic Community in East Java in the 2024 Elections. Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society, 3(1), 84–99. doi:10.59001/pjrs.v3i1.145
  78. Rusli, A. B. (2020). Sejarah Jaringan Hidayatullah di Minahasa: Pesantren dan Politik Dakwah [A History of Hidayatullah Networks in Minahasa: Pesantren and Da’wah Politics]. Lektur, 18(2), 275–302. doi:10.31291/jlka.v18i2.749
  79. Sarkowi, S., Aisyah, S., & Qosim, R. A. (2025). Symbolic Interaction of Kyai and Santri in the Perspective of Ethical Leadership Based on Religious Values. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education (IJMURHICA), 8(3), 388-402. Retrieved from https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/23736/
  80. Schwenk, J. (2023). The Effect of Primaries on Voters’ Evaluation of Candidates’ Quality–Experimental Evidence. Party Politics. doi:10.1177/135406882311846
  81. Sefina, A. D., Chalik, A., & Mahjumi, M. H. A. (2025). Hegemony, Personality, and Network: Kyai versus Kyai in Sumenep Local Election 2024. The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences, 4(2), 194–209. doi:10.15642/sarpass.2025.4.2.194-209
  82. Shin, J. (2018). Comprehensive Retrospective Voting in Mixed Electoral Systems: Evidence from the 2016 Korean Legislative Election. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 250–268. doi:10.1017/S1468109918000105
  83. Silfiana, R. (2020). A Traditional and Modern Education System of Pondok Pesantren in Perspective Philosophy of Education. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 43. doi:10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6894
  84. Sinarsari, A. L., & Adnan, M. (2025). Peran Kiai dalam Mobilisasi Politik melalui Jaringan Kiai Santri Nasional (JKSN) Jawa Timur pada Pemilihan Presiden 2024. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 14(2), 884-904. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/50000
  85. Siswanto, A. S., & Zuber, A. (2022). Political Influence of Kiai on Santri’s Voting Behavior at the 2019 Election. KnE Social Sciences, 62–70. doi:10.18502/kss.v7i19.12429
  86. Siswanto, I., & Yulita, E. (2019). Eksistensi Pesantren dengan Budaya Patronase (Hubungan Kiai dan Santri). Mitra Ash-Shibyan: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 2(1), 87–107. doi:10.46963/mash.v2i1.27
  87. Smith, L. E., & Walker, L. D. (2013). Belonging, Believing, and Group Behavior: Religiosity and Voting in American Presidential Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 399–413. doi:10.1111/jssr.12843
  88. Smith, A. E. (2014). Pastors and Politics: Brazilian Public Opinion Regarding Clergy Endorsements of Candidates. Americas Barometer Insights: 2015, 113, 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO913en.pdf
  89. Stiers, D. (2021). Political Information and Retrospective Voting. West European Politics, 44(2), 275–298. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1697564
  90. Sufaidi, A., Putri, R. Y., & Budiono, S. T. (2023). Perubahan Pola Perilaku Memilih Kaum Santri dalam Pemilu Daerah Serentak 2020 di Kabupaten Sumenep. Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 15(2). doi:10.32734/politeia.v15i2.9716
  91. Tebuireng.online. (2023, December 3). Ke Tebuireng, Mahfud MD: Ada Pesan Masa Lalu dan Masa Depan. Tebuireng.online. Retrieved from https://tebuireng.online/ke-tebuireng-mahfud-md-ada-pesan-masa-lalu-dan-masa-depan/
  92. Tempo.co. (2024, January 12). Ganjar Pranowo Berziarah ke Makam KH Hasyim Asyari dan Gus Dur. Tempo.co. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/foto/arsip/ganjar-pranowo-berziarah-ke-makam-kh-hasyim-asyari-dan-gus-dur-35160
  93. Turmudi, E. (2006). Struggling for the Umma: Changing Leadership Roles of Kiai in Jombang, East Java. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
  94. Turmudi, E. (2012). Puritanism vis-a-vis Traditionalism: Islam in Modern Indonesia. Harmoni, 11(2), 25–42. doi:10.32488/harmoni.v11i2.241
  95. Williamson, S., Yildirim, A. K., Grewal, S., & Kuenkler, M. (2023). Preaching Politics: How Politicization Undermines Religious Authority in the Middle East. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 555–574. doi:10.1017/S000712342200028X
  96. Woodward, K. (2015). Indonesian Schools: Shaping the Future of Islam and Democracy in a Democratic Muslim Country. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 5(1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1135591.pdf
  97. Zainurin, S. J., Wan Husin, W. N., Zainol, N. M., & Ismail, A. (2024). Peers Influence on Youth Political Behavior: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 182. doi:10.5296/ijssr.v12i2.21437
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 79 Download : 40

Meet Our Editorial Team

Dr. Hasrul Hanif
Department of Politics and Government | Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Editor in Chief
Dr. Wawan Mas'udi
Department of Politics and Government | Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
International Editorial Board
Read more

 

 

 
 
PCD Journal is a part of PCD Publication
ISSN Online : 2085-0441
ISSN Print : 2085-0433

Author Resources

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Review Process
  • Publications Ethics
  • Publication Fee
  • Copyrights

Journal History

PCD Journal is a part of PCD Publication. PCD Publication itself is an initiative to promote works and reports written in high-quality academic standard on the dynamics of power, conflict, and...

read more

Review Process

Every submitted article will be subject to single blind peer review. The normal review period is six months (depending on schedules). All research articles in...

read more

Author Guidelines

The editor of PCD Journal welcomes article submissions in accordance with the following guidelines...

read more

Publication Frequency

PCD Journal published twice a year, in two times issues, every June and December. PCD Journal...

read more

Open Access

Open Access

PCD journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange...

read more

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

PCD Journal follows publication ethic guideline from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which must be followed by all parties involved in PCD...

read more

Article Processing Charge

Processing Charge

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
This journal does not charge any fees for article submission. However, for publication...

read more

Membership

Membership

We encourage you either as a reader or author to participate on our open community. Our collaboration will increase the positive impact on how the knowledge would spread...

read more

Editorial Pick

Gold Mining and Political Struggles for Access in Banyuwangi, East Java

12 Juni 2020
Indah Surya Wardhani, Devy Dhian Cahyati

The Precarity of Peri-urban Resistance: A Resistance to the Forced Eviction of Pasar VI Village and the Development of Kualanamu International Airport, North Sumatera

12 Juni 2020
Iswan Kaputra, Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri

Creating Legal Facts: Indigenous People versus State Plantation Companies in Medan, Indonesia

10 Juni 2020
Wina Khairina, Christian Lund

Between Street Demonstrations and Ballot Box: Tenure Rights, Elections, and Social Movements among the Urban Poor in Jakarta

10 Juni 2020
Amalinda Savirani, Guntoro

Right-to-water Alliances in Indonesia and Two Critical Disjunctions

10 Juni 2020
Wijanto Hadipuro, Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri

Twitter LinkedIn Facebook email

Analytics

web
analytics View My Stats

Address

Room BA 403, 4th Floor, FISIPOL UGM Building, Bulaksumur, Sleman,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281.

Contact Info

Telp (0274) 563362
150; +62 811 2515 863
email: pcd@ugm.ac.id
© 2018 Site Owner, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Licensed under Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Site uses optimized OJS 3 PKP by openjournaltheme.com