PCD Journal
by PCD Press, Department of Politics and Government - Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
openjournathemelogo
Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

Page Header Logo

PCD Journal
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • Register
  • Login
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal History
    • Submissions
    • Publication Ethics
    • Publication Frequency
    • Publication Fee
    • Editorial Team
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • Register
  • Login
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal History
    • Submissions
    • Publication Ethics
    • Publication Frequency
    • Publication Fee
    • Editorial Team
    • Peer Reviewers
    • Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025

Issue Published : Nov 1, 2025

Constructing HEIs Performance

A CDA of the 2020–2021 MBKM Policy
https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v13i2.23255
Nugroho Prasetyo Aditama
n.prasetyoaditama@mail.ugm.ac.id
Department of Politics and Government, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Corresponding Author(s) : Nugroho Prasetyo Aditama

n.prasetyoaditama@mail.ugm.ac.id

PCD Journal, Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PCD Journal Vol. 13 No. 2 2025
Article Published : Dec 2, 2025

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

This study analyses how higher education institutions (HEIs) performance is constructed within the 2020–2021 Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) policy, within the context of the strengthening of neoliberal ideology in Indonesian higher education. Using Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach, this study examines five policy documents and elaborates on them with interviews with five MBKM student participants. NVIVO was used as a tool to facilitate in-depth analysis of the analysed aspects. The results show that the MBKM policy frames HEIs as institutions that support economic growth through discursive representations that emphasise neoliberal logic, such as efficiency, competitiveness, and industrial relevance. Terms such as "independence" and "selling point" are widely used and operated symbolically, obscuring ideological dominance and limiting the autonomy of higher education actors. Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU) system serves as an instrument for disciplining institutions through the performative construction of HEIs through a series of indicators aligned with neoliberal values. This study emphasise that higher education policy is not neutral but rather part of a social practice shaped by the interests of state actors, industry, and international financial institutions. Therefore, evaluation of HEIs performance needs to include an ideological reading, so that higher education can be returned to a liberating socio-academic role, rather than simply serving market interests.

Keywords

Higher education institutions performance MBKM critical discourse analysis neoliberalisation education policy
Aditama, N. P. (2025). Constructing HEIs Performance. PCD Journal, 13(2), 131-181. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v13i2.23255
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Airlangga, A. N. (2024). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka sebagai Manifestasi Neoliberal Governmentality [Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Retrieved from https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/241984
  2. Alawi, D., Sumpena, A., & Zaqiah, Q. Y. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5863–5873. doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3531
  3. Apple, M. W. (2001). Comparing Neo-liberal Projects and Inequality in Education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 37–41. doi: 10.1080/03050060120091229
  4. Apple, M. W. (2013). Knowledge, Power, and Education (1st ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.
  5. Atsnan, M. F. (2020). Menyambut Optimis Kebijakan Kampus Merdeka. news.detik.com. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4879056/menyambut-optimis-kebijakan-kampus-merdeka
  6. Ball, R., & Halwachi, J. (1987). Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Higher Education, 16(4), 393–405. doi: 10.1007/BF00129112
  7. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. New York, USA: Routledge.
  8. Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
  9. BEM UI. (2022). Evaluasi Program Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka (MBKM). BEM Universitas Indonesia. Retrieved from https://berkas.dpr.go.id/akd/dokumen/K10-43-6338c4b67819dbb7985232a434f225da.pdf
  10. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London, England: Penguin Books.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. In J. B. Thompson (Ed.), Polity Press (1st ed., Issue 2). Sunderland, Great Britain: T.J. Press Ltd. doi: 10.2307/3685295
  12. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York, USA: Zone Books.
  13. Bughin, J. (2018). Skill Shift: Automation and the Future of the Workforce. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/skill%20shift%20automation%20and%20the%20future%20of%20the%20workforce/mgi-skill-shift-automation-and-future-of-the-workforce-may-2018.pdf
  14. Cannella, G. S., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2017). Neoliberalism in Higher Education: Can We Understand? Can We Resist and Survive? Can We Become Without Neoliberalism? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 155-162. doi: 10.1177/1532708617706117
  15. Connell, R. (2019). The Good University: What Universities Actually Do and Why It’s Time for Radical Change. London, UK: Zed Books.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (4th ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.
  17. Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and Education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. doi: 10.1080/09518390701281751
  18. Doidge, S., Doyle, J., & Hogan, T. (2020). The University in the Global Age: Reconceptualising the Humanities and Social Sciences for the Twenty-First Century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(11), 1126–1138. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1752186
  19. Elton, L. (2004). Goodhart’s Law and Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18(1–2), 120–128. doi: 10.1080/09500790408668312
  20. Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London, UK: Routledge.
  21. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis the Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315834368
  22. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York, USA: Pantheon Books.
  23. Fuadi, T. M., & Aswita, D. (2021). Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM): Bagaimana Penerapan dan Kendala yang Dihadapi oleh Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Aceh. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 603–614. doi: 10.30601/dedikasi.v5i2.2051
  24. Gaus, N. (2016). Performance Indicators in Indonesian Universities: The Perception of Academics. The Australian Educational Researcher, 70(2), 127–144. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12085
  25. Gaus, N. (2019). Is State Control in Higher Education Governance Always Bad?: New Public Management and the History of Policy. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(2), 294–313. doi: 10.1111/aspp.12462
  26. Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Education. Chicago, USA: Haymarket Books.
  27. Gormley, K. (2018). Critical Studies in Education Neoliberalism and the Discursive Construction of ‘Creativity’ Neoliberalism and the Discursive Construction of ‘Creativity.’ Critical Studies in Education, 61(3), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2018.1459762
  28. Habibah, A. F. (2023a). Nadiem: Industri Berinvestasi Rp1,24 Triliun untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Antara News. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3362457/nadiem-industri-berinvestasi-rp124-triliun-untuk-perguruan-tinggi
  29. Habibah, A. F. (2023b). Nadiem: Kampus Merdeka Strategi Tingkatkan Daya Saing Perguruan Tinggi. Antara News. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3763152/nadiem-kampus-merdeka-strategi-tingkatkan-daya-saing-perguruan-tinggi
  30. Handford, M., & Gee, J.P. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (1st ed.). London, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203809068
  31. Harvey, D. L. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Sociological Perspectives, 33(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1388974 (Original work published 1990)
  32. Hatmanto, E. D., Pratolo, B. W., & Purwanti, E. (2023). Voices of English Education Department Teachers on Traces of Neoliberal Ideology in the ‘Kampus Merdeka’ Concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 1944–1953. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24694
  33. IMF. (1997). Indonesia Letter of Intent, October 31, 1997. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/103197.htm
  34. Indriati, P., Salim, M. F. S., Sihite, M., & Zulkifli. (2023). Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi dalam Perspektif Kinerja Layanan, Strategi Pemanfataan Teknologi, dan Kompetensi Sumberdaya Manusia. JIMP: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Pancasila, 3(1), 12–30. doi: 10.35814/jimp.v3i1.4088
  35. Irwansyah, A. K. (2024). Politik Intervensi Negara dalam Hubungan Industrial pada Praktik Magang Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 13(2), 470–486. doi: 10.37304/jispar.v13i2.13051
  36. Kemendikbud. (2020a). Merdeka Belajar Episode 2: “Kampus Merdeka.” Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoQSlZSUUhI&list=PL6nNxrzL_jfhjBOmh4UH6_5AIqn9zm0dx&index=5
  37. Kemendikbud. (2020b). Merdeka Belajar Episode 6: “Transformasi Dana Pemerintah untuk Perguruan Tinggi.” Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Y1b6s5fHY
  38. Klees, S. J. (2020). Beyond Neoliberalism: Reflections on Capitalism and Education. Policy Futures in Education, 18(1), 9–29. doi: 10.1177/1478210317715814
  39. Lakes, R. D., & Carter, P. A. (2011). Neoliberalism and Education: An Introduction. Educational Studies, 47(2), 107–110. doi: 10.1080/00131946.2011.556387
  40. Laruffa, F. (2024). Making Sense of (Post)Neoliberalism. Politics & Society, 52(4), 586–629. doi: 10.1177/00323292231193805
  41. Levidow, L. (2002). Marketizing Higher Education: Neoliberal Strategies and Counter-Strategies. In K.Robins & F.Webster (eds), The Virtual Univercity? Knowledge, Markets, and Management (pp. 227–248). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  42. Liebrucks, A. (2001). The Concept of Social Construction. Theory & Psychology, 11(3), 363–391. doi: 10.1177/0959354301113005
  43. Lynch, K. (2014). Control by Numbers: New Managerialism and Ranking in Higher Education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 190–207. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2014.949811
  44. Molas-Gallart, J., & C. Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and Conflict in the Development of ‘Third Mission’ Indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592
  45. Mayr, A. & Machin. D. (2023). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publication.
  46. Morley, C. (2024). The Systemic Neoliberal Colonisation of Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of the Obliteration of Academic Practice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(2), 571–586. doi: 10.1007/s13384-023-00613-z
  47. Mulderrig, J. (2011). Manufacturing Consent: A Corpus‐Based Critical Discourse Analysis of New Labour’s Educational Governance Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 562–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00723.x
  48. Münch, R. (2014). Academic Capitalism Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence. New York, USA: Routledge.
  49. Munfarida, E. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Perspektif Norman Fairclough. Komunika, 8(1), 1–19. doi: 10.24090/komunika.v8i1.746
  50. OECD (2019). Benchmarking Higher Education System Performance. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/be5514d7-en
  51. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. doi: 10.1080/02680930500108718
  52. Ozga, J. (2008). Governing Knowledge: Research Steering and Research Quality. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 261–272. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.3.261
  53. Pebrianto, F., & Silaban, M. W. (2022). Nadiem: Semakin Kolaborasi dengan Dunia Usaha, Semakin Relevan Pendidikan. Tempo. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/nadiem-semakinkolaborasi-dengan-dunia-usaha-semakin-relevan-pendidikan-432406
  54. Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London, UK: SAGE Publication.
  55. Prabowo, H. (2019). Nadiem Makarim: Pendidikan Harus Link and Match dengan Industri. Tirto.id. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/nadiem-makarim-pendidikan-harus-link-and-match-dengan-industri-eke9
  56. Rizvi, F. (2007). Postcolonialism and Globalization in Education. Cultural Studies, 7(3), 256–263. doi: 10.1177/1532708607303606
  57. Romaioli, D., & Mcnamee, S. (2021). (Mis)constructing Social Construction: Answering the Critiques. Theory & Psychology, 31(3), 315–334. doi: 10.1177/0959354320967757
  58. Rosser, A. (2016). Neo-liberalism and the Politics of Higher Education Policy in Indonesia. Comparative Education, 52(2), 109–135. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43926676
  59. Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (2005). Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader. London, UK: Pluto Press.
  60. Shore, C. & Wright, S. (2017). Death of the Public University Uncertain Futures for Higher Education in the Knowledge Economy. Oxford: England: Berghahn Books.
  61. Sihaloho, O. A. & Mukmin, B. A. (2024). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Transformatif: Menuju Warga Negara Berpikir Politis. Jurnal Transformative, 10(2), 170–196. doi: 10.21776/ub.transformative.2024.010.02.2
  62. Simatupang, E., & Yuhertiana, I. (2021). Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka terhadap Perubahan Paradigma Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Tinggi: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Ekonomi, 2(2), 30-38. doi: 10.47747/jbme.v2i2.230
  63. Sizer, J., Spee, A., & Bormans, R. O. N. (1992). The Role of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Higher Education, 24(2), 133–155. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447743
  64. Sudaryo, Y. (2015). Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi dengan Pendekatan Strategic Map Balanced Scorecard. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 1–12. doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v17i1.5666
  65. Sukataman, S., Wardhani, S. P., Musyaffa, K. B., & Alfiyah, S. (2023). Kritik Kepemimpinan Nadhiem Makariem terhadap Kurikulum Merdeka. IBTIDA-Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 116–129. doi: 10.33507/ibtida.v3i2.1273
  66. Susilo, J. (2021). Neoliberalisasi Pendidikan Tinggi Restruktukturalisasi Institusi dan Perlawanan Gerakan Mahasiswa Kini Studi Pasca PTN-BH UGM 2012-2020 [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31704.21765
  67. Sutrisno & Khoiri, N. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) di Perguruan Tinggi pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 19, 1–16. doi: 10.30603/ir.v19i1.3133
  68. Taylor, S. (2004). Researching Educational Policy and Change in ‘New Times’: Using Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451. doi: 10.1080/0268093042000227483
  69. Wong, Y. (2021). Student Alienation in Higher Education Under Neoliberalism and Global Capitalism: A Case of Community College Students’ Instrumentalism in Hong Kong. Community College Review, 50(1), 97–116. doi: 10.1177/00915521211047680
  70. Yoesdiarti, A., Amril, L. O., Kardaya, D., Handarini, R., & Yektyastuti, R. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Program Pembelajaran MBKM dalam Rangka Peningkatan Indikator Kinerja Utama Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 13(April), 71–81. doi: 10.30997/jsh.v13i1.5048
  71. Zhang, X. (2024). How Does Neoliberalism Influence the Growing Trend of Higher Education? International Journal of Educational Reform, 3663, 1–16. doi: 10.1177/10567879241255316
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 111 Download : 34

Meet Our Editorial Team

Dr. Hasrul Hanif
Department of Politics and Government | Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Editor in Chief
Dr. Wawan Mas'udi
Department of Politics and Government | Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
International Editorial Board
Read more

 

 

 
 
PCD Journal is a part of PCD Publication
ISSN Online : 2085-0441
ISSN Print : 2085-0433

Author Resources

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Review Process
  • Publications Ethics
  • Publication Fee
  • Copyrights

Journal History

PCD Journal is a part of PCD Publication. PCD Publication itself is an initiative to promote works and reports written in high-quality academic standard on the dynamics of power, conflict, and...

read more

Review Process

Every submitted article will be subject to single blind peer review. The normal review period is six months (depending on schedules). All research articles in...

read more

Author Guidelines

The editor of PCD Journal welcomes article submissions in accordance with the following guidelines...

read more

Publication Frequency

PCD Journal published twice a year, in two times issues, every June and December. PCD Journal...

read more

Open Access

Open Access

PCD journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange...

read more

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

PCD Journal follows publication ethic guideline from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which must be followed by all parties involved in PCD...

read more

Article Processing Charge

Processing Charge

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
This journal does not charge any fees for article submission. However, for publication...

read more

Membership

Membership

We encourage you either as a reader or author to participate on our open community. Our collaboration will increase the positive impact on how the knowledge would spread...

read more

Editorial Pick

Gold Mining and Political Struggles for Access in Banyuwangi, East Java

12 Juni 2020
Indah Surya Wardhani, Devy Dhian Cahyati

The Precarity of Peri-urban Resistance: A Resistance to the Forced Eviction of Pasar VI Village and the Development of Kualanamu International Airport, North Sumatera

12 Juni 2020
Iswan Kaputra, Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri

Creating Legal Facts: Indigenous People versus State Plantation Companies in Medan, Indonesia

10 Juni 2020
Wina Khairina, Christian Lund

Between Street Demonstrations and Ballot Box: Tenure Rights, Elections, and Social Movements among the Urban Poor in Jakarta

10 Juni 2020
Amalinda Savirani, Guntoro

Right-to-water Alliances in Indonesia and Two Critical Disjunctions

10 Juni 2020
Wijanto Hadipuro, Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri

Twitter LinkedIn Facebook email

Analytics

web
analytics View My Stats

Address

Room BA 403, 4th Floor, FISIPOL UGM Building, Bulaksumur, Sleman,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281.

Contact Info

Telp (0274) 563362
150; +62 811 2515 863
email: pcd@ugm.ac.id
© 2018 Site Owner, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Licensed under Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Site uses optimized OJS 3 PKP by openjournaltheme.com