Khansa Salsabila(1*)

(*) Corresponding Author


The global rise of Netflix as subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) has emerged along with its capitalization of film, television, and technology industry for the audience's convenience. It replaces the interest of local television with its claim of 'a global TV network' with cultural diversity in its contents. However, the term cultural diversity itself should be questioned whether it means to leave the American cultural power or it is only to claim themselves as a global company where global identity is represented in their identity to attract a wider audience. By using transnational approach, this study finds the use of cultural diversity merely to fulfill the demand of the American audience, with several globalization consequences in Netflix Original series, especially in non-American series. Those consequences are the homogenization in European-made Netflix series, where they appear to be fully Americanized with American lifestyle or American perspective, and heterogenization in Asian-made Netflix series with its collaboration of Asian culture and American popular culture. The claim of a 'global TV network' itself does not leave the American cultural power. Instead, they are taking advantage of the cultural power to retain the existing audiences and to fascinate more audiences. Therefore, the dependency of non-American producers in relying on Netflix platform as a way to reach global audience, even the use of Americanization to their works for global audience's satisfaction, confirms the cultural power of America in its ability to bring economic advancement to other countries.


cultural imperialism; globalization; heterogenization; homogenization; Netflix

Full Text:



Aguiar, L. and Waldfogel, J. (2017). Netflix: global hegemon or facilitator of frictionless digital trade?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(3), 419-445.

Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.

CBS News. (2016). Suddenly, Netflix is a "global tv network". Retrieved May 15, 2020 from

Goldsmith, J. (2019). Netflix wants to make its dubbed foreign shows less dubby. Retrieved February 1, 2021 from

Holton, R. (2000). Globalization's cultural consequences. The ANNALS of the American academy of political and social science, 570(1), 140-152. 10.1177/0002716200570001011.

Iwabuchi, K. (2002) Taking ‘‘Japanization’’ seriously. Recentering Globalization, pp. 23-50.

Jenner, M. (2018). Netflix and the re-invention of television. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ju, H. (2019). Korean TV drama viewership on Netflix: Transcultural affection, romance, and identities. Journal of international and intercultural communication, 13(1), 32-48. 10.1080/17513057.2019.1606269.

Laemmerhirt, I. (2013). Embracing differences: Transnational cultural flows between Japan and The United States. Transcript Verlag.

Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6(1), 119-138.

Maureen Lee, L. (2020). How 'Bridgerton' is poised to revolutionize romance on television. Retrieved February 2, 2021 from

McCracken, G. (2020). Is Netflix’s Sex Education US/UK mashup the future of TV?. Retrieved May 15, 2020 from

Mihăilă, Rodica. (2011). Cultural translation and the discourse of transnationalism in American studies. Journal of Transnational American Studies, 3(1).

Moody, R., (2019). Netflix subscribers and revenue by country. Retrieved May 15, 2020 from

Park, Seong Won. (2009). The present and future of Americanization in South Korea. Journal of futures studies, 14(1), 51 – 66.

Patton, R., (2019). Why 'Elite' has an americanized feel, even though it's filmed in Spain. Retrieved May 15, 2020 from

Plothe, T. and Buck, A. (2019). Netflix at the Nexus. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.

Ritzer, G. (2011). Globalization: The Essentials. John Willey & Sons Ltd.

Rossi, I. ed. (2007). Frontiers of globalization research: Theoretical and methodological approaches. Springer.

Rowe, J. (2010). Culture, US Imperialism, and globalization. A concise companion to American studies. Blackwell Publishing.

Sklair, L. (2007). A Transnational Framework for Theory and Research in the Study of Globalization. In I. Rossi (ed.), Frontiers of globalization research: Theoretical and methodological approaches. Springer.

Stephan, A. (2006). The Americanization of Europe. Berghahn.

Straubhaar, Joseph D. & Duarte, Luiz G. (2005). Adapting US transnational television channels to a complex world: From cultural imperialism to localization to hybridization. In Chalaby (ed.), Transnational television worldwide: Towards a new media order. IB Tauris.

Weiss, N., (2019). Elite creators are Dawson's creek fans, but that doesn't mean they intentionally Americanized their Spanish series. Retrieved May 15, 2020 from


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 14176 | views : 6903


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

   Crossref Google Scholar JournalStories Main logo  OAI logo  

View My Stats