THE ‘AMERICAN’ HEGEMONIC CULTURE: ITS ROOTS, FEATURES AND IMPLICATIONS TO WORLD CULTURE

https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v1i1.34157

Kasiyarno Kasiyarno(1*)

(1) Ahmad Dahlan University Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


That America is historically a nation which developed a hegemonic culture around the world has been an unquestionable issue for many Americanists. In that kind of culture, it insisted that the world had no alternative but acceptance of American ideas, values and way of life. This is what we call as Americanization which drives a cultural imperialism through eagerly practicing the hegemonic culture primarily when the country rose as the single world hegemon. It is really factual that American hegemonic culture is the cultural heritage from British Empire, which had already got a strong influence from Roman Empire. Because of the strong myth as the chosen people, the United States is clearly identified as a strong expansionist which always tries to control others and acts unilateraly. Through this way, the United States promotes itself as the most influential country and its culture as the most widely imitated around the world.


Keywords


Hegemonic Culture; Americanization; Expansionist; the Most Influential

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agnew, J. (2005). Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Ales, H. (1925). Old Americans. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Beeson. (2003). Resisting Hegemony: The sources and limits of anti-Americanism in South east Asia. Paper for the workshop on Globalization, Conflict and Political Regi mes in East and Southeast Asia, (August 15th-16th, 2003), Fremantle, WA.

Boorstin, D.J. (1962). The Image: Or What Happened to the American Dream. New York: Atheneum.

Bradley, W. L. & Lubis, M. (1991). Dokumen-Dokumen Pilihan tentang Politik Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat dan Asia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Burgett, B, & Hendler, G. (2007). An Introduction. In: Burgett, Bruce and Hendler, Glenn (eds.). Keywords for American Cultural Studies. New York and London: New York University Press.

Conry, Barbara. (1997). U.S. "Global Leadership": A Euphemism for World Policeman. Cato Policy Analysis, No. 267.

DeConde, A., Burns, R. D. & Logevall, F. (eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy: Studies of the Principal Movements and Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner‘s Sons.

Fallon, J. (1995). The Roots of American Order. The Social Contract, Winter, 150-151.

Ferguson, N, (2004). Colossus: The Price of America‘s Empire. New York: The Pinguin Press.

Fluck, Winfried. (2007). Theories of American Culture (and the Transnational Turn in American Studies). REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, No. 23, Narr Verlag, Tubingen.

Fluck, W., Brandt, S., and Thaler, I. (2007). Introduction: The Challenges of Transnational American Studies. REAL:Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, No. 23, Narr Verlag, Tubingen.

Freese, P. (1985). The American Dream and the American Nightmare: General Aspects and Literary Examples. Anglistik und Englischunterricht, 25 Heidelberg.

Garrison, J. (2004). America as Empire: Global Leader or Rogue Power? First Edition. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Grant, M. (1933). The Conquest of a Continent. New York: Charles Scribner's.

Grondin, David. (2006). Introduction: Coming to Terms with America’s Liberal Hegemony / Empire. In: David, C. P. & Grondin, D. (Ed.), Hegemony or Empire?: The Redefinition of US Power under George W. Bush. Hampsire: Ashgate Publishing Group.

Gruesz, K. S. (2007). “America,” in Keywords for American Cultural Studies, eds. Bruce B., & Glenn H. New York and London: New York University Press, (2007), 16-22.

Hanafi, S. (2009). Cultural Difference or Cultural Hegemony? Contextualizing the Danish Cartoon Controversy within Migration Spaces. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 2, 136–152. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

Hodson, J. (2000). Globalization and Nationalism in the United States: a Historical Perspective. In: Suryadinata, L. (Ed.), (2000). Nationalism and Globalization: East and West. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Hogan, M. J. (Ed.), (1999). The Ambiguous Legacy: U.S. Foreign Relations in the "American Century", New York: Cambridge University Press.

Holub, R. (1992). Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge, Inc.

Huebner, Groever G. 1906. The Americanization of the Immigrant. Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 27, 191-213.

Ignatieff, M. (2005). American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, New Jersey, 29-56.

Jiantao, H. (2007). Hurricanes from the South: On the Situations and Reasons of Canadian Americanization since World War II, Korean Review of Canadian Studies, South Korea, Vol. 13, 39-67.

Jiemin, G. (2005). Cultural Power and Cultural Conflict, www.crvp.org/book/Series03/III-20/chapter_iii.htm. Retrieved July 04, 2005.

Judis, J. B. (2004). The Folly of Empire: What George W. Bush Could Learn From Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kirk, R. (1993). America's British Culture. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Kroenig, M. & Ratner, A. (2007). How Globalization Went Bad. Foreign Policy. January/February.

Kroes, R. (1999). American Empire and Cultural Imperialism: A View from the Receiving End. Diplomatic History, Vol. 23, No. 3, 463-477. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

Levander, C. (2009). The Changing Landscape of American Studies in a Global Era. Working Together or Apart: Promoting the Next Generation of Digital Scholarship. Washington DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 27-34.

Luce, H. R. (1941). The American Century. Life. (February, 17th 1941). Daily News Headlines Digest. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6139.htm (June 5th 2010). Retrieved October 11, 2011.

Marsella, A. J. (2005). Hegemonic Globalization and Cultural Diversity. Australian Mosaic Fall. (2005), Issue 11, No. 13, 15-19.

Mead, W. R. (2002). Special Providence: The American Foreign Policy Tradition. New York: Routledge, Inc.

Mishkin, F.S. (2006). The Next Great Globalization: How Disadvantaged Nations Can Harness Their Financial Systems to Get Rich. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nye, Jr. J. S. (2007). Culture, Soft Power, and ‘Americanization’. In Held , D., Moore, H.L., & Young, K. (Ed.), Cultural Politics in a Global Age: Uncertainty, Solidarity and Innovation. Oxford: One world Publications.

Peterson, R. (1995). The Racial Origins of the Founders of America. Washington, DC: Scott-Townsend.

Pew Research Center, (2011). The American-Western European Values Gap. American Exceptionalism Subsides. Washington: Pew Global Attitudes Project.

Rauschenberger, E. (2003). It’s Only a Movie –Right? Deconstructing Cultural Imperialism: Examining the Mechanisms behind U.S. Domination of the Global Cultural Trade. Retrieved at www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/politics/undergrad/research/rauschen berger_thesis.pdf on August 3, 2012.

Ritzer. G. (1996). Sociological Theory. 4th Edition. Singapore: The McGraw-Hill Companies. Inc.

Sardar, Z. and Davies, M. W., (2004). Why Do People Hate America? Cambridge: Icon Books Ltd.

Schauer, F. (2005). The Exceptional First Amendment in American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Michael Ignatieff. 2005. Princeton: New Jersey, 29-56.

Smith, S.E., (2012). What is the "American Dream"? Wise GEEK: clear answers for common questions. Nevada: Conjecture Corporation, Sparks.

Soderberg, N. (2005). The Superpower Myth: the Use and Misuse of American Might. Hoboken. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural Imperialism: a Critical Introduction. London: Continuum. Tsonchev, T.S. (2012). Is America The New Rome? The Montreal Review. Canada: Tsonchev Publishing & Design.

Veriyawan, W. (2007). Politik Luar Negeri Amerika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Wattenberg, B. J. (1991). The First Universal Nation: Leading Indicators and ideas about the Surge of America in the 1990s. New York: The Free Press.

Wise, G. (1979). Paradigm Dramas in American Studies: A Cultural and Institutional History of the Movement. American Quarterly, 31, 293-337. The Johns Hopkins University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v1i1.34157

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2167 | views : 16536

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

   Crossref Google Scholar JournalStories Main logo  OAI logo  

View My Stats

ISSN & E-ISSN