PERGESERAN MAKNA PRIYAYI DALAM NOVEL PARA PRIYAYI KARYA UMAR KAYAM
Rudi Ekasiswanto(1*)
(1) Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Jln. Sosiohumaniora, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to determine the meaning of priyayi and its shift in Umar Kayam’s Para Priyayi. The theory
used in this study is the theory of hegemony Gramsci. The method used is descriptive and analytical methods. Descriptive
method is used to describe the social aspects of novel Para Priyayi, while analytical methods is used to analyze novel Para
Priyayi combining hegemony Gramsci. Para Priyayi containing values and meanings shift of Javanese noble. In addition,
the values infiltrated by the author; Umar Kayam as humanists, academics, writers, the Javanese, also gives hiss own view.
The emergence of multiple views, of course, establishes and leads a fight existing value of each character in the story. The
process happen allegedly contained negotiation among values. It is seen in moving process of humble class toward noble
class. The process of negotiation among characters is represented in figures Sastrodarsono and Lantip or the fights among
people in noble class their self. Such processes continue to be made to reach consensus and truth together.
Keywords: priyayi, the humble, the transformation of values, concencuss, negotiation, and hegemonic analysis
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Daftar Pustaka
Eagleton, Terry. 2002. Marxisme dan Kritik
Sastra. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Sumbu.
Faruk. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra: dari
Strukturalisme Genetik sampai PostModernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.
Faruk dan Ashadi Siregar (ed.). 2005. Umar
Kayam Luar Dalam. Yogyakarta: Pinus.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from Prison
Notebook, edited and translated by
Quentin Hoare and Geoffray N Smith,
London: Lawrenceadn Wishart.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1987. Perkembangan
peradaban Priyayi. Yogyakarta: Universitas
Gajah Mada Yogyakarta Press.
Kayam, Umar. 1972. Seribu Kunang-Kunang di
Manhattan. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
_____.1975. Sri Sumarah dan Bawuk. Jakarta:
Pustaka Jaya.
_____.1990. Mangan Ora Mangan Kumpul. Jakarta:
Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
_____.1995. Para Priyayi: Sebuah Novel. Jakarta:
Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
_____.1999. Jalan Menikung: Para Priyayi II.
Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Koentjaraningrat. 1984. Kebudayaan Jawa. Jakarta:
Balai Pustaka.
Kuntowijoyo. 1997. Para Priyayi Sebagai Novel
Sejarah. Makalah Seminar “Seni, Budaya,
dan Ilmu Pengetahuan”. Pusat Penelitian
Kebudayaan dan Perubahan Sosial.
Universitas Gajah Mada Yogyakarta.
Nurhadi. 2004. “Iblis Tidak Pernah Mati karya
Seno Gumira Adjidarma Analisis
Hegemoni Gramsci”. Tesis. Yogyakarta:
Universitas Gadjah Mada (tidak
diterbitkan).
Patria, Nezar dan Andi Arief. 1999. Antonio
Gramsci: Negara dan Hegemoni.Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar.
Ratna, Nyoman Kuta. 2009. Teori, Metode, dan
Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar.
Salam, Aprinus (ed.). 1998. Umar Kayam dan Jaring
Semiotik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Simon, Roger. 2000. Gagasan-Gagasan Politik
Gramsci. Terjemahan Kandani dan Imam
Baehaki. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiono, Muhadi. 1999. Kritik Antonio Gramsci
terhadap Pandangan Dunia Ketiga.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10382
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3547 | views : 5321Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2013 Poetika : Jurnal Ilmu Sastra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.