DOMINASI PENGUASA KOLONIAL TERHADAP BUMIPUTRA DALAM SURAT KERAJAAN PONTIANAK ABAD KE-19: ANALISIS PASCAKOLONIAL

https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10379

Bagus Kurniawan(1*)

(1) Sastra Indonesia UNS Jln. Ir Sutami No 36-A Kentingan Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract
Process of colonialism in a long archipelago led to a number of colonial domination colonizers against the
colonized. It can be seen in the classical Malay literature. Slightly, it is different from the concept of literature in the
modern sense, in the sense of classical Malay literature, including royal scripts as a literary work. Therefore, the local
royal scripts archipelago in the 18th century period 19th addressed to the colonial power are a classical Malay literature
to inform the colonial domination of the colonized people. As such, this paper outlines the dominance of colonial powers
against colonized peoples contained in the classical Malay literature, especially the royal letter. Royal scripts that serve as
the object of study in this paper is a letter sent Pontianak Royal Prince Syarif Abu Bakar Al Qadri to JF Walrave van
Nes, dated May 16, 1847. The script indicates the inequality relationship between the subjects with the object. Colonial
authorities have the power to regulate and dominate the native people. Relations between the Kingdom of Pontianak
with no colonial power relations that have the same bargaining power politics, and the Kingdom of Pontianak act as a
party dominated politically, and economically. Therefore, the Pontianak Kingdom of the letter will be analyzed through
postcolonial theory to see a picture of the condition of literary colonialism Kingdom of Pontianak in the 19th century.
Keywords: colonialism, domination, royal scripts, postcolonial



References

Daftar Pustaka

Boxer, C.R. 1983. Jan Kompeni dalam Perang

dan Damai (1602-1799). Jakarta: Sinar

Harapan.

Cowan, C.D. 1970. Tanah Melayu Kurun Kesembilan

Belas: Asal-usul Politik British. Kuala

Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Darban, Ahmad Adaby. 1990. Peran Serta Islam

dalam Perjuangan Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian

Sejarah Perjuangan Indonesia. Yogyakarta:

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam

Indonesia.

Djafaar, Irza Arnyta. 2007. Jejak Portugis di

Maluku Utara. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Hanafi, Hassan. 2000. Oksidentalisme: Sikap Kita

Terhadap Tradisi Barat. Diterjemahkan oleh

M. Najib Buchori. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Lapian, A.B. 1975. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Asia

Tenggara: Kolonialisme di Asia Tenggara, seri

studi wilayah nomor 2. Jakarta: Lembaga

Research Kebudayaan Nasional-LIPI.

Mu’jizah. 2009. Iluminasi dalam Sura-Surat

Melayu Abad ke-18 dan ke-19. Jakarta:

KPG, Ecole Francais d Extreme- Orient,

Pusat Bahasa—Departemen Pendidikan

Nasional, KITLV.

Loomba, Ania. 2003. Kolonialisme/

Pascakolonialisme. Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Pozzolini, A. 2006. Pijar-Pijar Pemikiran Gramsci.

Yogyakarta: Resist Book.

Reid, Anthony. 2004. Sejarah Modern Awal Asia

Tenggara: Sebuah Pemetaan. Ja k a r t a :

LP3ES.

Ricklefs, M.C. 1991. Sejarah Indonesia Modern.

Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University

Press.

Said, Edward. 1995. Kebudayaan dan Kekuasaan:

Memembongkar Mitos Hegemoni Barat.

Bandung: Mizan.

-------.2001. Orientalisme. Cet. Ke-4.

Diterjemahkan oleh Asep Hikmat.

Bandung: Pustaka



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10379

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2653 | views : 28451

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2013 Poetika : Jurnal Ilmu Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2503-4642 (online) | 2338-5383 (print)
Copyright © 2022 Poetika under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

free web stats View My Stats