Who are “Normal” and “Extreme” Muslims? Discursive Study of Christians’ Voice about Muslim’s Identity in Surakarta, Central Java

https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.29035

Suhadi Suhadi(1*)

(1) The Graduate Program of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article assumes that language is not only a way of saying things (informative), but also a way of doing things (performative) or exercising power. Through conducting eight focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 39 Christian participants in Surakarta Central Java, this research studies the Christians’ discourse on their fellow Muslims. In those FGDs, I stimulated the participants’ discussion by the basic question, “How do you speak about Muslims”. Though the question is about Muslims, but in fact sometimes they also speak about themselves. I am concerned about the discursive study of religion taking advantage from Norman Fairclough’s discourse analysis theory and method focusing on the analysis of linguistic practice, discursive practice, and social practice. As a result, the discussions of participants were on a hegemonic struggle between dominant and peripheral voices to define what is considered “[ab]normal” Muslims. Christian participants identified extremist (fanatical, fundamentalist) Muslims as abnormal. They positioned extremists and excessive persons as extraordinary. Thus, they identified extremism as not the norm but an exception to the rule of religions. In distinguishing between “normal” and “extreme” the participants primarily positioned themselves as normal or ordinary religious people who are moderate. They identified those who cause conflict as neither moderate Muslims nor moderate Christians, but fundamentalists in their respective faiths.

Keywords


discourse analysis; normal Muslims; extreme Muslims

Full Text:

PDF


References

Baidi. (2010). Agama dan Multikulturalisme. Pengembangan Kerukunan Masyarakat Melalui Pendekatan Agama. Millah Jurnal Studi Agama, 10, 1-29.

Beatty, A. (1999). Varieties of Javanese religion. An Anthropological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, J. (1991). How Much Culture is There in Inter-Cultural Communication? In J. Blommaert, J. Verschueren (eds.), The pragmatics of Intercultural and International Communication. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13-31.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying Identity. A Semantic History. The American Journal of History, 69 (4), 910-931.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Identity in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hefner, R. (2000). Civil Islam. Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster.

Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.

Kim, M. (2002). Non-Western Perspectives on Human Communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Kvale, S. (2008). Doing Interviews. Los Angeles: Sage.

Mulyadi, M., & Soedarmono. (1999). Runtuhnya Kekuasaan “Kraton Alit”. Studi Radikalisasi Sosial “Wong Sala” dan Kerusuhan Mei 1998 di Surakarta. Surakarta: LPTP.

Ndaluka, T. (2012). Religious Discourse, Social Cohesion and Conflict MuslimChristian Relation in Tanzania. München: Lit Verlag.

Nugroho, N. (2008). Menyintas dan Menyeberang. Perpindahan Massal Keagamaan Pasca 1965 di Pedesaan Jawa. Yogyakarta: Syarikat.

Ricklefs, M. (2012). Islamisation and Its Opponents in Java: A Political, Social, Cultural and Religious History, c. 1930 to Present. Singapore: NUS Press.

Samuel, H., Schulte, H., & Nordholt (eds). (2004). Indonesia in Transition, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Schatzman, M. (1971). Madness and Morals. Salmagundi, No. 16, R. D. Laing & Anti-Psychiatry (Spring), 159-184.

Sterkens, C., M. Machasin, F. Wijsen (eds.) (2007). Religion, Civil Society and Conflict in Indonesia. München: LIT Verlag.

Suhadi. (2006). Kawin Lintas Agama. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Suhadi. (2013). “I Come from Pancasila Family” A Discursive Study on MuslimChristian Identity Transformation in Indonesian Post-Reformasi Era (Berlin: Lit Verlag).

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In S. Worchel, & Austin, W. (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 7-24.

Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zizek, S. (2002). Introduction: Between the Two Revolutions. In S. Zizek (ed.), Revolution at the Gates: A Selection of [Lenin’s] Writings from February to October 1917. London and New



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.29035

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1650 | views : 556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 PCD Journal



web
analytics View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

       

 

 

                                © Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Gadjah Mada University Jl. Sosio-Yustisia Bulaksumur Yogyakarta 55281
                                                     Telp (0274) 563362 Ext. 150; +62 811 2515 863 - email: pcd@ugm.ac.id