Proliferation of Local Governments in Indonesia: Identity Politics within a Troubled Nation State

https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25739

Purwo Santoso(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article aims to scrutinise the phenomenon of proliferation of local government units in Indonesia in order to understand how identity politics has evolved within and through the process of decentralization. In doing so, there are several points to make. The numbers of districts and municipalities in Indonesia have doubled within six years. Local governments have proliferated in the sense that the numbers of local government units have multiplied rapidly in such a short period. There were 'only' a little bit more than 200 units when Suharto stepped down in 1998, and that had more than doubled to 466 units in 2006. Interestingly, this took place in an absence of a definite plan, as the state showed its enthusiasm for decentralisation and a bottom-up process of decision-making.

 

First, the state can no longer maintain its hegemonic role. Under the regimes of Sukarno and Suharto, the state possessed relatively effective technocratic and bureaucratic apparatus that ensured effective control over its people and agenda. Through technocratically equipped bureaucracies the state mobilised certain kinds of discourse that, in turn, defined what was deemed proper under the banner of ethnic and religious solidarity.

 

Second, local elites play critical roles in the process of proliferation. Moreover, in many cases their roles have reversed since the fall of the New Order. Previously, they were co-opted by the state but now, they are co-opting the state. Why is that so? The state is well aware of and even too sensitive to the potential of ethnic-based, race-motivated conflicts, as well as secession (Wellman 2005). Indeed, conflicts did take place quite extensively in Indonesia for that reason. As a result, the state opts to accomodate the interests of local elites instead of confronting them. In other words, proliferation of local government serves as a strategy for preventing political disintegration. Local autonomy is currently the best available solution to ethnic conflict in Indonesia (Bertrand 2004).

 

Third, the proliferation of local governments confirms the importance of territoriality or territorial attachment (Kahler and Walter 2006). Territory serves as a basis for identity politics. By establishing a new set of local governments, the central government still retains territorial control and, at the same time, local activists also have an opportunity to do so.


Full Text:

PDF


References

Anderson, B.R.O.G., 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

Cribb, Robert, 2009, Gangsters and Revolutionaries: The Jakarta People’s Militia and the Indonesian Revolution 1945–1949, Equinox Publishing, first published in 1991 by Allen & Unwin.

Easton, David, 1965, Framework for Political Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clift,.

Geertz, C., 1976, The Religion of Java, University of Chicago Press. Gilbert, Paul, 1998, The Philosophy of Nationalism, Boulder Corolado: Westview Press.

Harris, John; Kristian Stokke; and Olle Törnquist (eds.), 2005, Politicising Democracy: the New Local Politics of Democratisation, Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoffman, John, 1995, Beyond the State, Oxford: Polity Press. Indonesian Constitution of 1945.

Indra J. Pilliang et. al (eds.), 2003, Otonomi Daerah: Evaluasi & Proyeksi, Jakarta : Yayasan Harkat Bangsa bekerjasama dengan Partnership for Governance Reform in Indonesia.

Jorgensen, Mariane and Louise Philips, 2002, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, London: Sage Publications.

Lucas, Anton, 1991, One Soul One Struggle: Region and Revolution in Indonesia, Asian Studies Association of Australia.

McIntyre, Andrew, 1994, Organising Interest: Corporatism in Indonesian Politics, Working Paper no.43, Asia Research Center, Murdoch University, Australia; downloaded from http:// wwwarc.murdoch.edu.au/publications/wp/WP43.pdf; 27 May 2013

McVey, Ruth T., “The Beamtenstaat in Indonesia” in Anderson, B.R.O.G. and Audery Kahin (eds.), 2010, Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate, Singapore: Equinox Publishing PTE. Ltd.

Nono Anwar Makarim, “Pemerintahan yang Lemah dan Konflik”, in Dewi Fortuna Anwer et. al. (eds.), 2005, Konflik Kekerasan Internal: Tinjauan Sejarah, Ekonomi-Politik, dan Kebijakan di Asia Pasifik, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, LIPI. LASEMACNRS, KITLV-Jakarta.

Nordholt, Henk Schulte and Garry van Klinken (eds.), 2007, Politik Lokal di Indonesia (trans. Renegotiating boundaries local politics in post-Suharto Indonesia by Bernard Hidayat), Jakarta: KITLV and YOI.

Reis, Elisa P., “The Lasting Marriage Between Nation and State Despite Globalization” in International Political Science Review (2004), Vol 25, No. 3, 251-257, p. 252. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/1601666, downloaded, 18/03/2011 17:08

Robison, Richard and Vedi Hadiz, 2004, Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in the Age of Market, Routledge.

Ronan Paddison, 1983, The Fragmented State: The Political Geography of Power, Oxford: Basil Blackwel.

Said, H. Mohammed, Benedict Anderson, and Toenggoel Siagian, “What was the ‘Social Revolution of 1946’ in East Sumatera”, in Indonesia, No. 15 (April 1973), pp. 144–186; downloaded from http://cip.cornell.edu/DPubS?service=Repo sitory&version=1.0&verb=Disseminate&view=body&contenttype=pdf_1&handle=seap.indo/1107128621#, 27 May 2013.

Santoso, Purwo and Wawan Mas’udi (eds.), 2009, Banyak Jalan Menuju Roma: Pengembangan Adonara, Kabupaten Flores Timur, Department of Government Politics, Gadjah Mada University and the District Government of East Flores.

Sukarno, Bapperki Supaya Menjadi Sumbangan Besar Terhadap Revolusi Indonesia–For Bapperki to Significantly Contribute for Indonesian Revolution, Speech in the VIII Bapperki Congress, Gelora Bung Karno Sport Hall, 14 Maret 1963, http://www. munindo.brd.de/artikel/artbaperki4.html

Stephan Leibfried and Michael Zürn (eds.), 2005, Transformation of the State?, Cambridge: Cabridge University Press.

Syamsul Hadi et. al. (eds.), 2007, Disintegrasi Pasca Orde Baru: Negara, Konflik Lokal dan Dinamika International, Jakarta: Centre for International Relation Studies (CIReS) FISIP UI in cooperation with Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Tirtosudarmo, Riwanto, 2007, Mencari Indonesia: Demografi–Politik Pasca-Suharto, Jakarta: YOI.

Törnquist, Olle; Stanley Adi Prasetyo; Teresa Birks (eds.), 2010, Aceh: The Role of Democracy for Peace and Reconstruction, PCD Press.

Vincent, Andrew, “Conceptions of the State” in Mary Hawkesworth and Maurice Kogan (eds.), 1992, Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, London: Routledge .



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25739

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 646 | views : 638

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Power, Conflict and Democracy Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
analytics View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

       

 

 

                                © Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Gadjah Mada University Jl. Sosio-Yustisia Bulaksumur Yogyakarta 55281
                                                     Telp (0274) 563362 Ext. 150; +62 811 2515 863 - email: pcd@ugm.ac.id