Evaluasi pelaksanaan responsi praktikum Biokimia Farmasi kurikulum 2017 dengan soal UKAI-like model CBT

https://doi.org/10.22146/farmaseutik.v1i1.60791

Adam Hermawan(1*), Riris Istighfari Jenie(2), Rumiyati Rumiyati(3), Susi Ari Kristina(4)

(1) Departemen Kimia Farmasi, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Kimia Farmasi, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Departemen Kimia Farmasi, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, Yogyakarta 55281
(4) Departemen Farmasetika, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Metode computer based testing (CBT) dengan tipe soal multiple choice questions (MCQs) telah dilakukan untuk evaluasi pembelajaran pendidikan tinggi Farmasi. Evaluasi pembelajaran praktikum Biokimia Farmasi di tahun 2017 dan 2018 telah dilakukan dengan format CBT dengan tipe soal mirip UKAI (UKAI-like). Meskipun demikian belum pernah dievaluasi persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pelaksanaan responsi. Pada penelitian ini, selain dilakukan penilaian kemampuan kognitif, dilakukan juga evaluasi terhadap persepsi mahasiswa terhadap CBT dengan model UKAI-like. Sebanyak 214 mahasiswa Farmasi UGM semester II tahun akademik 2018/2019 terlibat dalam studi ini. Mahasiswa mengerjakan 30 soal tipe MCQs mirip UKAI dengan total waktu mengerjakan 20 menit. Ada 3 capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah (CPMK) untuk mata praktikum yang diukur yaitu pemahaman prinsip, pemahaman cara kerja serta kemampuan mengaplikasikan hasil praktikum. Persepsi dan penerimaan mahasiswa terhadap metode CBT untuk evaluasi pembelajaran praktikum diukur dengan kuesioner. Persentase CPMK praktikum menunjukkan hasil yang merata untuk ketiga jenis CPMK yaitu berada pada rentang 60%. Selain itu mahasiswa juga setuju bahwa metode CBT dapat diterima untuk evaluasi praktikum. Meskipun demikian, mahasiswa merasa bahwa soal responsi cukup sulit dan mengeluhkan terbatasnya waktu responsi. 


Keywords


computer based testing; multiple choice questions; evaluasi pembelajaran; Praktikum Biokimia Farmasi; persepsi

Full Text:

PDF


References

Anonim. 2017. Blueprint Uji Kompetensi Apoteker Indonesia Metode CBT. Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia. Aojula H, Barber J, Cullen R, and Andrews J. 2006. Computer-based, online summative assessment in undergraduate pharmacy teaching: The Manchester experience. 2006 6. Bloom TJ, Rich WD, Olson SM, and Adams ML. 2018. Perceptions and performance using computer-based testing: One institution's experience. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 10:235-242. 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.10.015 Boevé AJ, Meijer RR, Albers CJ, Beetsma Y, and Bosker RJ. 2015. Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment. PloS one 10:e0143616-e0143616. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143616 Freiwald T, Salimi M, Khaljani E, and Harendza S. 2014. Pattern recognition as a concept for multiple-choice questions in a national licensing exam. BMC Med Educ 14:232. 10.1186/1472-6920-14-232 Ichikawa A. 2007. [Pharmaceutical Common Achievement Test: computer-based testing (CBT)]. Yakugaku Zasshi 127:941-945. 10.1248/yakushi.127.941 Kim MK, Patel RA, Uchizono JA, and Beck L. 2012. Incorporation of Bloom's taxonomy into multiple-choice examination questions for a pharmacotherapeutics course. Am J Pharm Educ 76:114. 10.5688/ajpe766114 Kristina SA, Gustriawanto N, Rokhman MR, Aditama H, and Sari IP. 2018. Students’ first experience with Objective Structured Clinical Examination in a pharmacy school in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 8:102-106. McMillan A, and Barrickman A. 2017. Implementation of a skills practical to first-year pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 9:1111-1116. 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.024 Ngo SNT. 2018. Can multiple choice questions assess application of knowledge in pharmaceutical science teaching? 2018 18. Norcini JJ. 2003. Work based assessment. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 326:753-755. 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.753 Rumiyati, Jenie R, Hermawan A, Meiyanto E, and Sismindari. 2018. Rencana Program Kegiatan Pembelajaran Semester Biokimia Farmasi Kurikulum 2017. Sharif S, Gifford LA, Morris GA, and Barber J. 2018. Diagnostic testing of first year pharmacy students: A tool for targeted student support. Pharmacy Education 7. Stupans I. 2006. Multiple choice questions: Can they examine application of knowledge? Pharmacy Education 6. Zheng M, and Bender D. 2019. Evaluating outcomes of computer-based classroom testing: Student acceptance and impact on learning and exam performance. Med Teach 41:75-82. 10.1080/0142159x.2018.1441984



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/farmaseutik.v1i1.60791

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1377 | views : 704

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Majalah Farmaseutik Indexed by:

   
 
Creative Commons Licence
 
 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.