Komparasi Munculnya Liberalisme Ekonomi di Indonesia dan Burma
Hatib Abdul Kadir(1*)
(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper explores the genealogy of the birth of the economic growth system in Indonesia and Burma. First, it is a major transformation that occurs in both countries in the form of commodification of land, labor and money. And the formation of pluralism in the colonial society. Second, the transformation of capitalism in Burma that enters through the system of bureaucratic governance, education and social order in rural communities. Third, the study of comparative application of economic liberalism in Indonesia and Burma and its social effects. And the emergence of middle class society who came from outside of original community. The author uses Karl Polanyi’s approach for looking at the social effects of economic liberalism, based on the transformation of three things: the privatization of the land, the commodification of labor and the emergence of the system of money and debt. This comparison primarily uses extensive data from J.S Furnivall in view of the application of an economic liberalism system which is then enriched with studies from other economic historians, such as Thomas Lindblad, Anne Booth and the study of political economics, Richard Robison.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andaya, Leonard (1993). The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Arief, Sritua, and Adi Sasono (1981). Indonesia, dependency and underdevelopment. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Published for the Institute for Development Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia by META.
Boeke, J. H. (1953). Economics and economic policy of dual societies, as exemplified by Indonesia. New York: International Secretariat, Institute of Pacific Relations.
Boomgard, Peter, and Jan Luiten van Zanden (1990). Changing economy in Indonesia 10, 10. Amsterdam: The Royal Tropical Instiute.
Booth, Anne (1998). The Indonesian economy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries a history of missed opportunities. New York: St. Martin’s Press in association with the Australian National University, Canberra.
Booth, Anne (2007). Colonial legacies economic and social development in East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Dove, Michael (2011). The banana tree at the gate a history of marginal peoples and global markets in Borneo. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Eagleton, Terry (2011). Why Marx was right. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Frank, Andre Gunder (1975). On capitalist underdevelopment. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
Furnivall, J.S. (1939). Netherlands India: a study of plural economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939)
Furnivall, J.S. (1948). Colonial Policy and Practice: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.
Graeber, David (2007). Lost people magic and the legacy of slavery in Madagascar. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Harvey, David (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, David (2012). Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York: Verso.
Knaap, Gerrit J. (2003). “Headhunting, Carnage and Armed Peace in Amboina, 1500-1700”. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 46(2), pp. 165-192
Leur, Van (1955). Indonesian Trade and Society. W. Van Hoeve Publishers.
Li, Tania (2014). Land’s end: capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Duke University Press. Durham, NC.
Lindblad J.Th. (1996). Business strategies in late colonial Indonesia. In: Lindblad J.Th. (Ed.) Historical foundations of a national economy in Indonesia, 1890s-1990s. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 207-228.
Ong, Aihwa (1987). Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline factory women in Malaysia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Polanyi, Karl (2001). Great Transformation. The Political Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press.
Ricklefs, Merle Calvin (2001). A History of Modern Indonesia Since C. 1200. Third Edition. Stanford University California.
Robison, Richard (1986). Indonesia: the rise of capital. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: the politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon
Sader, Amir (2008). “The Weakest Link?,” New Left Review, 52 July-August.
Scott, James (1979). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Smith, Adam (1990). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Raleigh, N.C.: Alex Catalogue.
Stoler, Ann Laura Stoler (1995). Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra’s Plantation Belt, 1870-1979. University of Michigan Press.
Well, Kathirithamby (1992). “The Age of Transition: The mid-Eighteenth to the Early Nineteenth Century”, dalam Nicholas Tarling (ed), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: From early times to c. 1800, Volume 1 (pp. 599-600).Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Tony (2009). “Latin America Tamed?,” New Left Review, 58, July-August.
Yoshihara, Kunio (1988). The rise of ersatz capitalism in South-East Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lembaran-sejarah.33541
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 5947 | views : 43459Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Lembaran Sejarah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.