THE PATHOLOGY OF TRIBAL NATIONALISM ACCORDING TO HANNAH ARENDT: UNCOVERING RELIGIOUS POPULISM MECHANISMS WHICH JEOPARDIZE CULTURAL DIVERSITY

https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.40876

Johannes Haryatmoko(1*)

(1) Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The sustained rise of religious populism across the globe has influenced Indonesian political situation. In Indonesia, the last ten years have witnessed the increasingly widespread emergence of religious populism. Populists express strong moral judgments in decrying corruption, moral decadence and corrupted elite in power. They define society in Manichean terms as divided into a good ‘us’ and an evil ‘them’. In defining both of these categories, they put forward the important role of religious identities in order to classify who fits into the category of ‘us’ and who belongs to ‘them’. Hannah Arendt offers sharp analyses allowing to uncover religious populism mechanism. Her main analysis was based on the pathology of tribal nationalism. The result of her analysis helps us to  explore the similarities of tribal nationalism pathology and religious populism phenomena. The use of comparative and critical approaches helps to conclude that the pathology of tribal nationalism gives lessons on how such a movement cannot accept differences and tends to be totalitarian. Such a comparison opens new perspectives on helping to examine the phenomena of propaganda, slandering, intimidation, mass mobilization, persecution, violence, and formations of paramilitary forces as  instruments for totalitary movements used by religious populism. Such phenomena are loaded with manipulations and lies which have fragmented social groups and weakened political culture so that ideological consensus is impossible. Ordinary citizens, even the intellectual, are not able to oppose well-organized lies and manipulations. The danger is that such religious populism maneuvres risk jeopardizing the foundation of the Indonesian nation, which is formulated under the motto “unity in diversity”.

Keywords


nationalism pathology; religious populism; nation; diversity; totalitarianism

Full Text:

PDF


References

Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Les Origines du totalitarisme: Le système totalitaire,

                              translated by Jean-Loup Bourget, R. Davreu and P. Lévy, Paris: Seuil.

_____________. 1995. Asal-usul Totalitarisme: Imperialisme, Vol. II,  translated by

                A. A. Nugroho and J.M. Subijanta, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

_____________. Imperialism, Nationalism, Chauvinism. The Review of Politics,

1945. Cambridge University Press for University of            

                             Notre Dame on behalf of Review of Politics, 7(4): 441-463.

_____________. Imperialist Character.  The Review of Politics 1950. Cambridge University Press for University of Notre Dame on behalf of Review of Politics, 12(3): 303-320.

_____________. 1961. Condition de l’homme moderne, translated from English by 

                              George Fradier, Paris: Calman Lévy.

_____________. 1972. Du mensonge à la violence (Crises of the Republic), translated

                                     from English by Guy Durand, Paris: Calman Lévy.

Baudrillard, Jean, 1981. Simulacres et Simulation, Paris: Gallilée.

Beiner, Ronald.   “Arendt and Nationalism”, in Dana Ricahrd Villa (ed.), Cambridge  Companion to Hannah Arendt, Cambridge Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 44-62.

Cocks, Joan. 1996. On Commonality, Nationalism, and Violence: Hannah Arendt, Rosa. Luxemburg and Frantz Fanon. In Women in German Yearbook, 12:39-51. (http://about.jstor.org/terms).

Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, Edinburg: Longman.

Fuller, Steve,. 2018. Post-Truth: Knowledge as A Power Game, London: Anthem Press

Gellner, Ernest. 1983.  Nation and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Girard, René, 1982. Le bouc émissaire, Paris: Grasset.

Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York: Vintage Books.

Haryatmoko. 2010.  Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Llorente, José Antonio. 2017. The Post-Truth Era: Reality vs. Perception. Uno Magazine. 27 March 2017, p. 9, www.Uno-Magazine.com.

Marzouki, Nadia (ed.) 2016, Saving the People: How Populist Hijack Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Midlarsky, Manus I. 2011.  Origins of Political Extremism: Mass Violence in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.40876

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 813 | views : 499

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Haryatmoko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kawistara is published by the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.


Copyright © 2019 Jurnal Kawistara