Respons Fungsional Burung Pentet (Lanius sp.) terhadap Belalang Kembara (Locusta migratoria manilensis)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpti.11771

Siti Astuti(1*), Kasumbogo Untung(2), F. X. Wagiman(3)

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Penyuluh Pertanian Yogyakarta
(2) Fakultas Pertanian Unersitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Fakultas Pertanian Unersitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The functional response of predatory bird, Lanius sp. (Passeriformes: Laniidae) on migratory locust [Locusta migratoria manilensis (Orthoptera: Acrididae)] had been studied under restricted condition. The migratory locusts were reared in the green house. Second and fourth nymph instars along with adult stages of the migratory locust were used in this trial. Maximum feeding and functional response of the predatory bird against the migratory locust were determined. Research protocol used follows Holling’s model. Results showed that the maximum feeding of the predatory bird was very high i.e. against 2nd and 4th instars and adult of the locust were 2.75 preys/minute, 0.13 preys/minute, and 0.09 preys/minute; respectively. The relationship between predatory bird and migratory locust fitted with the Holling’ s type 2 functional response. The high feeding rate of the predatory bird revealed that the bird is a promising candidate of biological control agent on migratory locust.


Keywords


functional response; Lanius sp.; Locusta migratoria manilensis

Full Text:

PDF


References

Anonim. 1996. Padi Huma Diserang Belalang kembara. http://www.kompas.com, modified 2/12/01.

Begon,M.,M.Mortimer., & D.J. Thompson. 2002. Population Ecology. Blackwell Science, London. 256 p.

Holling, C. S.1959. Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 91: 385–398.

Krebs. C.J.1985. Ecology. Harper and Row Publisher, New York. 800 p. Luff, M.L.1983. The Potential of Predators for Pest Control. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 10: 159–181

MacKinnon, J. 1988. Field Guide to the Birds of Java and Bali. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. 390 p.

Poole, A.E., R.A.Stillman, H.K.Watson, & K.J. Norris. 2007. Searching Efficiency and The Functional Responsse of a Pause-Travel Forager. Journal of Functional Ecology: 21: 784–792

Speight, M.R., M.D. Hunter., & A.D. Watt. 1999. Ecology of Insect, Concepts and Application. Blackwell Science. 350 p.

Tarumingkeng, R.C. 1994. Dinamika Populasi Kajian Ekologi Kuantitatif. Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta. 284 p.

Untung, K. 2006. Pengantar Pengelolaan Hama Terpadu (edisi kedua). Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. 348 p.

Untung, K., FX .Wagiman, & S. Hardjastuti. 2003. Kajian Pengendalian Hama Belalang Kembara dan Pemanfaatan Limbahnya di Kabupaten Sumba Timur. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Fakultas Pertanian UGM, Yogyakarta.

Varley, G.C. & G.R.Gradwell. 1974. The Use of Models and Life Tables in Assesing the Role of Natural Enemies, p. 93–112. In C.B. Huffaker (ed.), Biological Control. Plenum Press, New York.

Wilps, H., R. Peveling & B. Diob. 1996. Integrated Biological Control of Grasshoppers and Locusts. Summary Report on The Field Research in Mauritania 1992–1995, Mauritania. 42 p.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpti.11771

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1022 | views : 1166

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2009 Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 height=auto

Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia ISSN 1410-1637 (print)ISSN 2548-4788 (online) Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 30/E/KPT/2018, Vol. 21 No. 1 the Year 2017 - Vol. 25 No. 1 the Year 2021. Design by WibisenoIndexing & Abstracting , view my stats