Medical Students Preference in Blended Learning after Covid-19 Pandemic: Online vs Offline
Widyandana Widyandana(1*), Nurul Izzah(2), Prattama Santoso Utomo(3), Mora Claramita(4)
(1) Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Background: Blended learning has been preferred to be implicated during the transition phase after the pandemic. Nowadays, universities started to shift back into offline learning after being retained for nearly 2 years. The effectiveness of digital learning should be considered. Even though it provided simplicity and ease, the effectiveness was questionable due to a lack of interaction and hands-on practice. Thus, blended learning combines face-to-face and digital learning to maximise the knowledge transfer during classes. However, the efficacy of both offline and online learning was still questioned. Each has benefits and drawbacks, which differ for every student in various conditions. This study assessed medical students’ preferences in the blended learning era.
Method: This study used a cross-sectional design. An online survey was conducted among first-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada (N=201). Data were analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach referring to Doyle et al.
Results: Among 201 students who were included in our study, the topmost learning categories chosen to be given in an online setting were lectures (N=97), learning skills (N=18), and discussion (N=16). For offline settings, they preferred practical skills (N=114), lectures (N=41), and skills laboratory (N=40). Students mentioned network problems as their finest challenge during online classes, and network support was the most needed to improve the learning outcome.
Conclusion: Passive activities that require the least effort were favoured to be given online, and activities requiring active participation were preferred to be given face-to-face. Limitations were challenging for students in participating in online classes; further evaluation and improvement are needed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2021). New UNESCO global survey reveals impact of COVID-19 on higher education. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/new-unesco-global-survey-reveals- impact-covid-19-higher-education (Accessed September 11, 2023).
Dost, S. et al. (2020) ‘Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students’, BMJ Open, 10(11). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378.
Kumar, A. et al. (2021) ‘Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in Health Professional Education: A mixed methods study protocol’, BMC Medical Education, 21(1). doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02871-w.
Singh, P. et al. (2021) ‘A comparative study on effectiveness of online and offline learning in higher education’, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific, 4(3), pp. 102–114. doi:10.32535/ijthap.v4i3.1212.
Muthuprasad, T. et al. (2021) ‘Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during covid -19 pandemic’, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), p. 100101. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101.
Atwa, H. et al. (2022) ‘Online, face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and Medical Students’ perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-method study’, Frontiers in Medicine, 9. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.791352.
Mondal H, Mondal S, Swain SM. (2021) ‘A nationwide online survey on comparative preference of face-to-face lecture, online synchronous, and asynchronous learning in Indian undergraduate medical students’, Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine, 4(3). doi:10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_158_20
Franz, A. et al. (2022) ‘How do medical students learn conceptual knowledge? high-, moderate- and low-utility learning techniques and perceived learning difficulties’, BMC Medical Education, 22(1). doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03283-0.
Ashraf, M.A. et al. (2023) ‘Acceptance of smart technologies in Blended learning: Perspectives of chinese medical students’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), p. 2756. doi:10.3390/ijerph20032756.
Vincent, A. et al. (2022) ‘Breaking bad news: A randomized controlled trial to test a novel interactive course for medical students using blended learning’, Patient Education and Counseling, 105(1), pp. 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.002.
Wang, D. et al. (2022) ‘Enhancement of medical students’ performance and motivation in pathophysiology courses: Shifting from traditional instruction to blended learning’, Frontiers in Public Health, 9(813577). doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.813577.
Johnson B, Christensen LB. Educational Research : Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (4th ed). New York: Sage Publications, 2012
Dimitroff A, Davis WK. Content analysis of research in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 1996 Jan;71(1):60-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199601000-00019.
Cristancho SM, Goldszmidt M, Lingard L, Watling C. Qualitative research essentials for medical education. Singapore Med J. 2018 Dec;59(12):622-627. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018093.
Doyle, L. et al. (2019) ‘An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within Nursing Research’, Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), pp. 443–455. doi:10.1177/1744987119880234.
Lim, C.L., She, L. and Hassan, N. (2022) ‘The impact of live lectures and pre-recorded videos on students’ online learning satisfaction and academic achievement in a Malaysian Private University’, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), pp. 874–880. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.9.1696
Clarin, A.S. and Baluyos, E.L. (2022) ‘Challenges encountered in the implementation of online distance learning’, EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(1), pp. 33–46. doi:10.35877/454ri.eduline591
(2020) Strengthening Digital Learning across Indonesia: A Study Brief [Preprint].
Naseer, S. and Zahida Perveen, H. (2023) ‘Perspective chapter: Advantages and disadvantages of online learning courses’, Massive Open Online Courses - Current Practice and Future Trends [Working Title] [Preprint]. doi:10.5772/intechopen.1001343.
Murphy, L., Eduljee, N.B. and Croteau, K. (2021) ‘Teacher-centered versus student-centered teaching’, Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), pp. 18–39. doi:10.36021/jethe.v4i1.156.
Xia, Y. et al. (2022) ‘Challenges of online learning amid the COVID-19: College students’ perspective’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037311.
Pradana, M. and Syarifuddin, S. (2021) ‘The struggle is real: Constraints of online education in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Frontiers in Education, 6. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.753776.
You, X., Tan, Y. and Yang, L. (2021) ‘The difference of effectiveness between online and offline class’, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 615. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211220.205.
Portulans Institute. (2022). Network Readiness Index. Portulans Institute. Available at: https://networkreadinessindex.org (Accessed September 2023)
Genoveva, G., Syahrivar, J. and Srirahayu Ariestiningsih, E. (2023) ‘Technology readiness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from Indonesia’, CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, 17(1), pp. 93–102. doi:10.21512/commit.v17i1.8068.
Kaur, K. et al. (2022) ‘Digital Eye strain- A comprehensive review’, Ophthalmology and Therapy, 11(5), pp. 1655–1680. doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00540-9.
Gupta, R., Chauhan, L. and Varshney, A. (2021) ‘Impact of e-schooling on Digital Eye Strain in coronavirus disease era: A survey of 654 students’, Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 33(2), p. 158. doi:10.4103/joco.joco_89_20.
Aldukhayel, A. et al. (2022) ‘Digital Eye Strain caused by online education among children in qassim region, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study’, Cureus, 14(4). doi:10.7759/cureus.23813.
Bolatov, A. et al. (2020) ‘Online-learning due to COVID-19 improved mental health among medical students’, Medical Science Educator, 31(1), pp. 183–192. doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01165-y.
Thahir, M., Widiawati, W. and Baitillah, N. (2023) ‘The Post Pandemic Education : A blended learning approach for teaching and learning in higher education in New Normal Era’, International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 3(3), pp. 99–108. doi:10.46336/ijeer.v3i3.461.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.98044
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 44 | views : 29Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Widyandana Doni, Nurul Izzah, Prattama Santoso Utomo, Mora Claramita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:
JPKI Stats