Exploring the Utility of Trello – An Alternative Learning Management System in Facilitating Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education

Elisa Nugraha Haryadi Salakay; Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava

doi:10.22146/jpki.87753

Exploring the Utility of Trello – An Alternative Learning Management System in Facilitating Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.87753

Elisa Nugraha Haryadi Salakay^(1*), Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava⁽²⁾

(1) Faculty of Medicine, Cenderawasih University
(2) Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: The increasing utilization of technology in medical education calls for innovative learning media that can effectively support teaching and learning processes. Exploring alternative Learning Management System (LMS) options is necessary because some LMSs have cost customization and usability limitations.

Aim: This review explores the potential utility of Trello, an alternative LMS, as a tool for facilitating Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in medical education.

Learning Media Review: Trello, a flexible and user-friendly LMS based on Kanban, provides features like boards, lists, and cards that users can customize to create tutorial learning processes. Trello facilitates student-centered learning, collaboration, active learning, communication, and critical thinking, all essential principles in PBL. It enables synchronous and asynchronous learning sessions, allows tutors to monitor and interact with students, and provides centralized organization and tracking of tasks and progress.

Conclusion: Trello demonstrates excellent potential as an alternative LMS in medical education. Its adaptable features, seamless integration with various technologies, and user-friendly interface make it an engaging platform for educators and learners. Trello effectively supports the implementation of PBL tutorials, mainly using the Seven Jump method. However, we should consider user training, accessibility, and inclusivity. Further research is recommended to explore assessment methods, enhance student engagement, and assess long-term implementation and sustainability.

Keywords

Trello, learning management system, medical education, problem-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Jha S. Role of technology in medical education: SWOC analysis. SBV J Basic, Clin Appl Heal Sci. 2022;5(1):19–21.

2. Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260–70.

3. MacNeill H, Masters K, Nemethy K, Correia R. Online learning in health professions education. Part 1: Teaching and learning in online environments: AMEE Guide No. 161. Med Teach [Internet]. 2023;0(0):1–14.

4. Kolcu G, Başer Kolcu Mİ, Demir S, Gülle K. The evaluation of learning management system in medical education in time of COVID-19. Prog Nutr. 2020;22(10):1–11.

5. Gamage SHPW, Ayres JR, Behrend MB. A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. Int J STEM Educ [Internet]. 2022;9(1):9.

6. Nataliia L, Liudmyla I, Mykhailivna DN, Ivanna V, Olha Y, Ivanivna BS. Moodle innovation learning technology for medical education: from theory to practice. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33:245–60.

7. Memon AR, Rathore FA. Moodle and online learning in Pakistani medical universities: An opportunity worth exploring in higher education and research. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(7):1076–8.

8. Park JH, Son JY, Yoo NJ, Kim S. A review on usage and effectiveness of e-learning in medical education. Korean J Med Educ. 2010;22(2):91–100.

9. Shkoukani M. Explore the major characteristics of learning management systems and their impact on e-learning success. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2019;10(1):296–301.

10. Al-Azawei A, Parslow P, Lundqvist K. Barriers and opportunities of e-learning implementation in Iraq: A case of public universities. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2016;17(5):126–46.

11. Buch AC, Rathod H, Kamble R. E-learning: The Scenario During COVID-19 Pandemic. J Med Educ. 2020;19(2):1–7.

12. Abdulmohson A, Kadhim MF, Hussein Anssari OM, Al-Jobouri AAH. Cost analysis of on-premise versus cloud-based implementation of Moodle in Kufa University during the pandemic. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2022;25(3):1787–94.

13. Mohammadi MK, Mohibbi AA, Hedayati MH. Investigating the challenges and factors influencing the use of the learning management system during the Covid-19 pandemic in Afghanistan [Internet]. Vol. 26, Education and Information Technologies. Springer US; 2021. 5165–5198 p.

14. Matarirano O, Jere NR, Sibanda HS, Panicker M. Antecedents of Blackboard Adoption by Lecturers at a South African Higher Education Institution – Extending GETAMEL. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;16(1):60–79.

15. Johnson HA. Trello Resource Review. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2017;106(2):209–11.

16. Shchetynina O, Kravchenko N, Horbatiuk L, Alieksieieva H, Mezhuyev V. Trello as a Tool for the Development of Lifelong Learning Skills of Senior Students. Postmod Openings. 2022;13(2):143–67.

17. Fernando A, Mansur A, Alves A, Torres R. Trello as virtual learning environment and active learning organiser for PBL classes: an analysis under bloom’s taxonomy. 2019.

18. Rathakrishnan M, Kaur M, Zakaria H, Raman A. Trello virtual learning and its effect on students’ critical thinking skills in essay writing. 2020 Jan 1;815–24.

19. Eiland LS, Todd TJ. Considerations when incorporating technology into classroom and experiential teaching. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019;24(4):270–5.

20. Arbulu R, Ballard G, Harper N. Kanban in construction. In: 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction [Internet]. Consultant, Strategic Project Solutions, rarbulu@strategicprojectsolutions.net; 2003.

21. Zigelman I. Constructivism and the community of inquiry. In: Robpower, editor. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018. Power Learning Solutions; 2018. p. 7–23.

22. Descamps S, Marchal P, Temperman G, De Lièvre B. Supporting e-learning design with Trello. In 2022.

23. Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb;22(1):104.

24. Bana KFM, Shamim MS, Shahid Z. Self-assessment of active learning and critical thinking during problem-based learning: An exploratory study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022;72(9):1771–4.

25. López-Alcarria A, Olivares-Vicente A, Poza-Vilches F. A systematic review of the use of Agile methodologies in education to foster sustainability competencies. Sustain. 2019;11(10).

26. Alghamdi AA, Alanezi MA, Khan ZF. Design and implementation of a computer aided intelligent examination system. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(1):30–44.

27. Osman ASA, Faizal Khan Z. Novel methodology for arbitration of talented students using an electronic system: A higher education perspective. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(21):250–7.

28. Sapkota A. Blending online digital tools in low resourced classrooms in Nepal. J NELTA Gandaki. 2020;3(1–2):45–56.

29. Błaś R. Building trust among the clients of cloud computing industry. Case Study of Trello, Inc. J Posit Manag. 2017;7(2):3.

30. Abuhassna H, Van NT, Yahaya N, Zakaria MAZM, Awae F. Strategies for successful blended learning— a bibliometric analysis and reviews. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2022;16(13):66–80.

31. Sun S, Zheng X, Gong B, Paredes JG, Ordieres-Meré J. Healthy operator 4.0: A human cyber–physical system architecture for smart workplaces. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(7):1–21.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.87753