USING THE INDONESIAN MANCHESTER CLINICAL PLACEMENT INDEX (I-MCPI) TO ASSESS THE QUALITY OF HOSPITAL-BASED AND COMMUNITY-BASED CLINICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.69652

Audelia Kathleen Sulaiman(1), Carolyn Carolyn(2), Natalia Puspadewi(3*), Elisabeth Rukmini(4)

(1) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
(2) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
(3) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pembangunan Jaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Clinical placement is crucial to develop the fundamental competencies in providing patient care. Therefore, clinical learning environment (CLE) assessment is necessary to ensure its quality. The Indonesian Manchester Clinical Placement Index (I-MCPI) is an instrument for assessing the quality of the learning environment and the quality of training in both hospital and community placements. This study aimed to (1) measure the CLE quality of a school of medicine in Jakarta using I-MCPI and (2) explore the qualitative data resulted from the I-MCPI to draw a comprehensive conclusion about CLE.

Methods: 155 respondents filled the online I-MCPI, and ten respondents participated in the in-depth interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using the guideline provided by the original MCPI. The qualitative data analysis was performed using content analysis method.

Results: Quantitative data resulted in ranks of the 18 clinical placements, including primary teaching hospital and its network clinical placements. Trends in Primary Health Care (PHC) placement showed lower rank on the CLE and the training quality. The primary teaching hospital was in the sixth position. The qualitative results identified issues of the supervisor’s role, students’ involvement, and learning facilities were identified as significant factors that influenced CLE.

Conclusion: Most respondents were satisfied with the quality of learning in clinical rotation at the school. However, respondents suggested more support for students to be actively involved in clinical services, perform clinical skills, and encourage learning facilities to optimize the CLE.


Keywords


clinical education, clinical learning environment, Manchester Clinical Placement Index (MCPI), adaptation, Indonesian MCPI

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Buja LM. Medical education today: all that glitters is not gold. BMC Med Educ 2019;19(1):110.
  2. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010;
  3. Hyde S, Hannigan A, Dornan T, McGrath D. Medical school clinical placements – the optimal method for assessing the clinical educational environment from a graduate entry perspective. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):7.
  4. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical teacher 1997;19(4):295–299.
  5. AlHaqwi AI, Kuntze J, Molen HT van der. Development of the clinical learning evaluation questionnaire for undergraduate clinical education: factor structure, validity, and reliability study. BMC Med Educ 2014;14(1):44.
  6. Strand P, Sjöborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Medical Teacher 2013;35(12):1014–1026.
  7. Dornan T, Muijtjens A, Graham J, Scherpbier A, Boshuizen H. Manchester Clinical Placement Index (MCPI). Conditions for medical students’ learning in hospital and community placements. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2012;17(5):703–716.
  8. Carolyn C, Lukito A, Sulaiman AK, Rukmini E. Manchester Clinical Placement Index (MCPI) As Clinical Learning Environment Assessment Tool: Adaptation into Indonesian Language. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia. Forthcoming 2021
  9. Leduc J-M, Rioux R, Gagnon R, Bourdy C, Dennis A. Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews. Medical Teacher 2017;39(3):285–294.
  10. Dornan T, Conn R, Monaghan H, Kearney G, Gillespie H, Bennett D. Experience Based Learning (ExBL): Clinical teaching for the twenty-first century. Medical Teacher 2019;41(10):1098–1105.
  11. Wenger-Trayner É. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. 18th printing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008;
  12. Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Medical Teacher 2012;34(2):e102–e115.
  13. Puskesmas dan Tantangan Kesehatan Kekinian [Homepage on the Internet]. Republika Online. 2008 [cited 2021 Jul 21];Available from: https://republika.co.id/berita//no-channel/08/10/29/10527-puskesmas-dan-tantangan-kesehatan-kekinian
  14. Struktur Organisasi Puskesmas Berdasarkan Permenkes 75 Tahun 2014 [Homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 21];Available from: https://www.mitrakesmas.com/2017/12/struktur-organisasi-puskesmas.html
  15. Permenkes No. 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Standar Teknis Pemenuhan Mutu Pelayanan Dasar Pada Standar Pelayanan Minimal Bidang Kesehatan [JDIH BPK RI] [Homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 22];Available from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/111713/permenkes-no-4-tahun-2019
  16. Lucas B, Pearson D. Patient perceptions of their role in undergraduate medical education within a primary care teaching practice. Education for Primary Care 2012;23(4):277–285.
  17. Tanaka K, Son D. Experiential learning for junior residents as a part of community-based medical education in Japan. Education for Primary Care 2019;30(5):282–288.
  18. Adema M, Dolmans DHJM, Raat J (A. N), Scheele F, Jaarsma ADC, Helmich E. Social Interactions of Clerks: The Role of Engagement, Imagination, and Alignment as Sources for Professional Identity Formation. Academic Medicine 2019;94(10):1567–1573.
  19. Bannister SL, Hanson JL, Maloney CG, Dudas RA. Practical Framework for Fostering a Positiv Learning Environment. PEDIATRICS 2015;136(1):6–9.
  20. Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, et al. The clinical learning environment. Medical Teacher 2019;41(4):366–372.
  21. Jong J de, Visser M, Van Dijk N, Vleuten C van der, Wieringa-de Waard M. A systematic review of the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 24. Medical Teacher 2013;35(6):e1181–e1196.
  22. Gruppen LD. Context and complexity in the clinical learning environment. Medical Teacher 2019;41(4):373–374.
  23. Horsburgh J, Ippolito K. A skill to be worked at: using social learning theory to explore the process of learning from role models in clinical settings. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):156.
  24. Alsiö Å, Wennström B, Landström B, Silén C. Implementing clinical education of medical students in hospital communities: experiences of healthcare professionals. Int J Med Educ 2019;10:54–61.
  25. Samuriwo R, Laws E, Webb K, Bullock A. “I didn’t realise they had such a key role.” Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2020;25(1):75–93.
  26. Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, et al. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Medical Teacher 2018;40(11):1102–1109.
  27. Cardoso JR, Pereira LM, Iversen MD, Ramos AL. What is gold standard and what is ground truth? Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19(5):27–30.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.69652

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 953 | views : 775

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Audelia Kathleen Sulaiman, Carolyn Carolyn, Natalia Puspadewi, Elisabeth Rukmini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  
JPKI Stats