PRECLINICAL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS FACTORS OF ACHIEVING MEDICAL COMPETENCE

Christine Tjahjadinata; Natalia Puspadewi; Elisabeth Rukmini

doi:10.22146/jpki.45370

PRECLINICAL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS FACTORS OF ACHIEVING MEDICAL COMPETENCE

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.45370

Christine Tjahjadinata^(1*), Natalia Puspadewi⁽²⁾, Elisabeth Rukmini⁽³⁾

(1) Program Studi Kedokteran, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta - INDONESIA
(2) Medical Education Unit, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta - INDONESIA
(3) Medical Education Unit dan Prodi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta - INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Based on the existing research, medical competence achievements in DKI Jakarta’s primary health care was lower than other provinces in Indonesia. Some of the competence achievements in preclinical years were also lower than the level of competence achievement in the Standard of Indonesian Doctor Competence, regardless the diseases are at the third and fourth levels. This research aimed at exploring the factors which influenced the competence achievement of the preclinical years based on student’s perceptions.

Methods: The research was a descriptive analytic study with a qualitative approach using Focus Group Disscussion (FGD). Nine preclinical students of 2013 batch were chosen purposefully based on the recommendation from faculty members and students. Data were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis method.

Results: There are several factors that influence the competence achievement of the preclinical students. These included the factors of student, curriculum, faculty, environmental, and facility. There were four participants in the first meeting and five participants in the second meeting.

Conclusion: Based on student’s perception, the factors which affect the competence achievements in preclinical years are student factors, curriculum factors, faculty factors, environmental factors, and facility factors.

Keywords: competence, medical education, preclinical, qualitative

Keywords

competence, medical education, preclinical, qualitative

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adisasmito W, Purwantyastuti, Djuwita R, Thabrany H, Iljanto S, Kamso S, et al. Persepsi stakeholders tentang kompetensi dokter di layanan kesehatan primer. Maj Kedokt Indon. 2010; 60: 15–21.

2. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Potret Pendidikan Kedokteran di Indonesia. 2018

3. Tjahjadinata C. Gambaran pencapaian kompetensi penyakit kedokteran level 3 dan 4 mahasiswa preklinik angkatan 2013 di Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Unika Atma Jaya [skripsi]. Jakarta: Unika Atma Jaya; 2017.

4. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. InfoDATIN Data dan Kondisi Penyakit Osteoporosis di Indonesia. 2015.

5. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. InfoDATIN Situasi Kesehatan Jiwa di Indonesia. 2019.

6. Anggraini DD, Purnomo W, Trijanto B. Interaksi Ibu Hamil dengan Tenaga Kesehatan dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepatuhan Ibu Hamil Mengonsumsi Tablet Besi (Fe) dan Anemia di Puskesmas Kota Wilayah Selatan Kota Kediri. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2018; 21(2): 82-89.

7. Almeida F, Faria D, Queiros A. Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. European Journal of Education Studies. 2017; 3: 369-387.

8. Shakouri N. Qualitative Research: Incredulity Toward Metanarrativeness. Journal of Education and Human Development. 2014; 3(2): 671-680.

9. Ridlo IA, Putri NK, Intiasari AD, Sandra C, FirdausiNJ, Adriansyah, et al. FGD Dalam Penelitian Kesehatan. 2018.

10. Paramita A, Kristiana L. Teknik Focus Group Disscussion Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2013; 16(2): 117-127.

11. Fawzia FN, Probandari A, Suyatmi. Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Faktor Penunjang Pembelajaran Dalam Skills Lab. Nexus Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. 2017; 6(1): 16-29.

12. Saputra O, Lisiswanti R. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Pembelajaran Keterampilan Klinik di Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran. Juke Unila. 2015; 5(9): 104-109.

13. Pujiati. The Difference in clinical reasoning competence between pre-clinical students and clinical students on pediatric tropical disease cases. Sains Medika. 2015; 6: 25-29.

14. Wurdinger DD, Carlson JA. Teaching for experiential learning: Five approaches that work. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education; 2010.

15. Faculty Innovation Center, The University of Texas at Austin. Experiential learning defined [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jun 14]. Available from: https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/strategies/overview/experiential-learning.

16. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jun 10]. Available from: https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/

17. Darmadi. Kemampuan dasar mengajar. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2009.

18. Johnson EB. Contextual teaching and learning: Menjadikan kegiatan belajar-mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Setiawan I, penerjemah; Sitompul I, editor. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center (MLC); 2007. Terjemahan dari: Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It is and Why It’s Here to Stay.

19. Santoso G. Fundamental metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka; 2008.

20. Fitriya SM. Minat belajar mahasiswa ditinjau dari intensitas perhatian orang tua dan ketersediaan sumber belajar pada mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta [skripsi]. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2013.

21. Fitria H, Yani EA. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat mahasiswa memilih Perguruan Tinggi Ekonomi Islam (Studi kasus: STEI SEBI). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah. 2014; 99-130.

22. Sumar WT, Razak IA. Strategi pembelajaran dalam implementasi kurikulum berbasis soft skill. Ed ke-1. Yogyakarta: Deepublish; 2016.

23. Santrock J. Educational psychology. Ed ke-5. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.

24. Kurdi FN. Penerapan student-centered learning dari teacher-centered learning mata ajar ilmu kesehatan pada program studi penjaskes. Forum Kependidikan. 2009; 28: 108-113.

25. Spencer AL, Brosenitsch T, Levine AS, Kanter SL. Back to the basic sciences: An innovative approach to teaching senior medical students how best to integrate basic science and clinical medicine. Academic Medicine. 2008; 83: 662-669.

26. Maadawi ZME. The role of e learning in integration of basic & clinical medical sciences, complete blood count (CBC) e-learning course, a case study from Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University. 2010.

27. Brooks G, Burton M. European adult learning glossary, level 1. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy; 2008.

28. Study on European terminology in adult learning for a common language and common understanding and monitoring of the sector. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy; 2010.

29. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi. 2016.

30. Yudaristy H, Irfanuddin, Azhar MB. Persepsi mahasiswa dan dosen tentang ketercapaian kompetensi dasar dan klinis pendidikan dokter di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sriwijaya. Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. 2014; 1: 25-33.

31. Vallori AB. Meaningful learning in practice. Journal of Education and Human Development. 2014; 3: 199-209.

32. Suwarni E. Hubungan gaya mengajar dosen dalam proses pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi dan Pendidikan Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora. 2012; 1: 246-256.

33. Saputra O, Lisiswanti R. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ketertarikan mahasiswa dalam kelas besar. Juke Unila. 2015; 5(9): 115–118.

34. Collaborative learning: Group work [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jun 07]. Available from: https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/engaging-students/ collaborative-learning.html

35. Lumonga N. Depresi tinjauan psikologis. Jakarta: Kencana; 2009.

36. Musabiq SA, Karimah I. Gambaran Stress dan Dampaknya Pada Mahasiswa. Insight. 2018; 20(2): 75-83.

37. Christyanti D, Mustami’ah D, Sulistiani W. Hubungan antara penyesuaian diri terhadap tuntutan akademik dengan kecenderungan stres pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya. INSAN. 2010; 12: 153-159.

38. Sutjiato M, Kandou GD, Tucunan AAT. Hubungan faktor internal dan eksternal dengan tingkat stres pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. JIKMU. 2015; 5: 30-42.

39. Hansen M. Right-sizing the classroom: Making the most of great teachers [paper]. Washington, D.C.: CALDER; 2014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.45370