Ujian Praktikum Histologi dengan Tayangan Foto Menghasilkan Skor yang Lebih Tinggi

Rina Susilowati; Jajah Fachiroh; Andwi Ari Sumiwi

doi:10.22146/jpki.25322

Ujian Praktikum Histologi dengan Tayangan Foto Menghasilkan Skor yang Lebih Tinggi

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25322

Rina Susilowati^(1*), Jajah Fachiroh⁽²⁾, Andwi Ari Sumiwi⁽³⁾

(1) Departemen Histologi dan Biologi Sel, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Histologi dan Biologi Sel, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Departemen Histologi dan Biologi Sel, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Since 2003, Histology practical session in Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada as well as its assessment had been subjected into several changes, i.e. methods of practical asessment and the usage of practical session score as block score components. Score of practical session assessments has been used as marker of student’s achievement in mastering the learning objectives. This study compared practical session score of Histology practical assessment between student from batch 2003-2006, 2007-2010 and 2011-2012, in order to determine which method give highest student achievement.

Method: Score of histology practical assessment from 3 groups of medical students were obtained from the archive. The data was reported as mean±SD and number distribution of the students with score ≥60. The difference between groups was analyzed using t-test and chi-square.

Results: There were 2213 students included in this study, i.e. 735 of year 2003-2006 (microscope-based test, score used as component of block score), 920 of year 2007-2010 (microscope-based test, score not used as component of block score), and 558 of year 2011-2012 (micrograph-based test, score was used as component of block score). Mean score for each group were 76,83±7,40; 74,54±14,40; dan 83,47±9,02, respectively. Percentage of students with score ≥60 were 83,59%, 73%, dan 97,49%. There were significant difference between groups (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Score of histology practical assessment was higher in students tested with micrographs visualized by projector. The percentage of students with score ≥60 was higher when the score was used as component of block score.

Keywords

histology, practical session, assessment, micrograph

Full Text:

PDF

References

Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Bräuer L. Virtual microscopy – the future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann. Anat. 2010;192:378-82.
Heidger PM, Dee F, Consoer D, Leaven T, Duncan J, Kreiter C. Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging. Anat. Rec. 2002;269:107-12.
Lichnovska R, Krajci D, Erdosova B, Krajci D. Our experience with e-learning method of teaching practical histology. MEFANET J 2015;3(2):48-53.
Glaltz-Krieger K, Spornitz U, Spatz A, Mihatsch MJ, Glatz D. Factors to keep in mind when introducing virtual microscopy. Virchows Arch. 2006;448:248-55.
Munoz AL, Lopez JL. Use of virtual microscopy to promote Histology learning. A Mendez-Vilas A (ed). Microscopy: advances in Scientific research and education; 2014, pp. 1210-3.
Pratt RL. Are we throwing histology out with the microscope? A look at histology from the physician’s perspective. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009;2:205-9.
Bloodgood RA, Ogilvie RW. Trends in histology laboratory teaching in United states Medical Schools. Anat. Rec 2006;289B:169-75.
Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen R. Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2013;6(5):307-15.
Coleman R. Can histology and pathology be taught without microscopes? The advantages and disadvantages of virtual histology. Acta Histochem 2009;111:1-4.
Scoville SA, Buskirk TD. Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting. Clin Anat. 2007;20:565-70.
Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in anatomical Science: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009;2:253-9.