Fleksibilitas Belajar Mengajar Melalui Metode Blended Learning

Fandianta Fandianta; Guardian Yoki Sanjaya; Widyandana Widyandana

doi:10.22146/jpki.25178

Fleksibilitas Belajar Mengajar Melalui Metode Blended Learning

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25178

Fandianta Fandianta^(1*), Guardian Yoki Sanjaya⁽²⁾, Widyandana Widyandana⁽³⁾

(1) Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Palembang
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: E-learning as a new paradigm in modern education, is an alternative learning model than just face to- face. As simply, e-learning is defined as learning to use the electronic media, which aims to increase knowledge and performance. Studying by using e-learning is important to build the education sector in Indonesia, particularly as an effort to improve equity and access in education, particularly in health domain. Implementing of e-learning in health education are very relevant to the concept of continuing medical /health education that leads to continuous professional education. However, the higher education in Indonesia is still slightly to implement learning-based electronic systems. Several studies have shown the enthusiasm of higher education in using e-learning. The benefits and differences of using e-learning need to be carefully evaluated, especially for health education. This study analyzed the use of e-learning for teaching and learning in health education. In addition, identifying the barriers of e-learning for students.

Method: The study was conducted in Poltekkes Kemenkes Palembang involving second-year Nursing students. A quasi-experimental approach was used for two groups of students, 1) e-learning users (treatment) and 2) non e- learning users (control), who were taking the Health Promotion subject. The data were collected using a pre-post tests and questionnaires. Data was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: Pre-post test results showed a significant difference to the increasing of students’s knowledge who is participating in e-learning compared with conventional learning (p <0,05). There is a positive perception of the discussion, assignments, quizzes / exams, and the availability of teaching materials amongst the students who are participating in e-learning.

Conclusion: Blended learning method provide a positive impact on teaching and learning in nursing students. This method should be considered as a complement to conventional learning.

Keywords

E-learning, blended learning, Poltekkes, improving student’s knowledge, flexibility of learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Wahono RS. Pengantar e-Learning dan Pengembangannya [Internet]. 2005: 1–10. Available from: http://ilmukomputer.com.
Zhang D. Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers. 2003; 5(2): 201–12.
Wirawan S. Pengembangan e-Learning di Poltekkes Depkes Mataram sebagai suatu metode pembelajaran yang berbasis Teknologi Informasi (TI). 2009:150.
Munir. Penggunaan Learning Management System (LMS) di Perguruan Tinggi: Studi Kasus di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2010; 29(1): 109–19.
Al-Fadhli S. Students’ Perceptions of E-learning in Arab Society: Kuwait University as a case study. E-learning [Internet]. 2008; 5(4): 418–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.4.418
Abdelaziz M, Samer Kamel S, Karam O, Abdelrahman A. Evaluation of e-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teaching and Learning in Nursing [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2013 Mar 2]; 6(2): 50–8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1557308710000910
Curran V, Lockyer J, Sargeant J, Fleet L. Evaluation of learning outcomes in web-based continuing medical education. Academic Medicine. 2006; 81(10): 30–4.
Keefe G, Wharrad HJ. Using e-learning to enhance nursing students’ pain management education. Nurse education today [Internet]. 2012 Nov [cited 2013 Apr 28];32(8):e66–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/22513154 Ruiz JG,
Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. the impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine. 2006; 81(3): 207–12.
Silva CS, Souza MB, Silva Filho RS, de Medeiros LM, Criado PR. E-learning program for medical students in dermatology. Clinics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2013 Mar 1];66(4): 619–22. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322011000400016&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Sung YH, Kwon IG, Ryu E. Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom. Nurse education today [Internet]. 2008 Nov [cited 2013 Apr 28]; 28(8): 943–52. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 18599162
McVeigh H. Factors Inûuencing the Utilisation of e-Learning in Post-Registration Nursing Students. 2009;91–9.
Maryani Y. Aplikasi E-Learning Sebagai Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Di Jurusan Kesehatan Gigi Poltekkes Kemenkes Pontianak. 2011:125.
Muzid S, Munir M. Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Penerapan e-Learning sebagai Aplikasi Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Pada Universitas Islam Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2005 (SNATI 2005); 2005.
Henry P. E-learning technology, content and services. Education + Training. 2001; 43(4): 249–55.
Welsh ET, Wanberg CR, Brown KG, Simmering MJ. E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. international journal of training and development [internet]. 2003 Dec;7(4): 245–58. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x
Riyanto DE, Sarwoko EA, Kushartantya. E-learning sebagai model proses pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. In: Seminar Nasional SPMIPA 2006.
Mc Kimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching web based learning. BMJ. 2003; 326(April):870–3.
Soekartawi. Blended e-learning: alternatif model pembelajaran jarak jauh di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2006.
Singh H. Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology. 2003; 43(6): 51–4.
Yu S, Chen IJ, Yang KF, Wang TF, Yen LL. A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for public health nurse continuing education in Taiwan. Nurse education today [Internet]. 2007 Oct [cited 2012 Apr 17]; 27(7): 755–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 17175074
Voci E, Young K. Blended learning working in a leadership development programme. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2001; 33(5): 157–60.
Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Cetakan 2. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2012.
Larson DK. Comparing student performance:online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2009;13(1):31-43.
Shen Q, Chung JKH, Challis D, Cheung RCT. A Comparative study of student performance in traditional mode and online mode of learning. Computer applications in engineering education [internet]. 2007 [cited 2013 Mar 30];15(1):30–40. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ cae.20092
Hugenholtz NIR, De Croon EM, Smits PB, Van Dijk FJH, Nieuwenhuijsen K. Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) [Internet]. 2008 Aug [cited 2013Mar 15]; 58(5): 370-2. Available from: ttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2493067&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
Steinweg S, Davis ML, Thomson WS. A Comparison of traditional and online instruction in an introduction to special education course. Teacher education and special education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children [Internet]. 2005 Jan 1; 28(1):62–73. Available from: http://tes.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/ 088840640502800107
Buzzetto-more NA. Student perceptions of various -learning components. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects. 2008; 4:113–35.