Validitas dan Reabilitas Metode Penilaian Students Oral Case Analysis (SOCA) pada Mahasiswa Tahap Sarjana Kedokteran

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25157

Sylvia Mustika Sari(1*)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Oral case presentations will be a vital component in medical career. The Student Oral Case Analysis (SOCA) is the assessment method of students’ ability in presenting their knowledge in case analysis, communication skills, and appropriate professional interactions. In fact, the studies in SOCA are still very limited. The aim of this study was to observe the validity and reliability of the oral assessment or SOCA in undergraduate medical education.

Method: The cross sectional study in the third year students in the Medical Faculty of University Jenderal Ahmad Yani. Content-related validity was achieved by a panel expert in developing case and guide for examiners in SOCA, while concurrent validity was achieved by the correlation between SOCA and MCQ results. Inter-rater reliability was estimated by kappa coefficient.

Results: The panel expert has done to receive the content validity. As concurrent validity evidence, the correlation between SOCA and MCQ result was 0.441 (p<0.01). Inter-rater reliability with the result of Kappa coefficient was 0.893 (p<0.01).

Conclusion: The result shows that SOCA in undergraduate education was valid enough and reliable to assess the cognitive aspect.

 


Keywords


SOCA, assessment, validity, reliability, undergraduate.

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Jouhin G. A short guide to oral assessment.
  2. Available from: http://www.leedsmet.ac.uk.100317_3668_ShortGuideDrafAssess_WE.LeedsMetropolitanUniversityandUniversityofWollongang.
  3. Dolmans DH, Gijselaers WH, Moust JH, De Grave WS, Wolfhagen IH, Van de Vleuten CP. Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher. 2002; 24(2):173–80.
  4. SOCA Manual. Available from: http://medapps.medicine.merger.edu /mu_medicine/academics/.../bmpmanual.pdf.
  5. The New England Journal of Medicine. 12; 352(19):1945-6.
  6. Sobel RK. Medicine as a second language. NEJM. 2005;352:1945-6.
  7. Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No.25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Medical Teacher. 2003; 25(6):569–84.
  8. Cohen RJ, Swerdlik ME. Psychological testing and assessment. An introduction to test and measurement. New York: Mc. Graw Hill; 2005.
  9. Linn RL, Gronlund NE. Measurement and assessment in teaching. 8th edition. Upper Saddle River. NewJersey: Merrill Prentice Hall; 2000.
  10. Kaplan RM, Saccuzzo DP. Psychological testing. Principles, applications, and issues. California: Brooks Cole Publishing Company Pacific Grove; 1989.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25157

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 434 | views : 812

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

JPKI Stats