Hubungan antara Persepsi Situasi Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Belajar Mahasiswa Blok Muskuloskeletal di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25107

Rhendy Wijayanto(1*), Harsono Mardiwiyoto(2), Amitya Kumara(3)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Pelita Harapan, Jakarta
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(3) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Comprehension on student’s learning approach is an essential issue because it deals with the learning quality. Student’s perception on learning environment is a factor that influences student’s learning approach. The aims of this study were to describe student’s perception on learning environment, student’s learning approach, relationship between student’s perception on learning environment with learning approach applied in musculoskeletal block at Faculty of Medicine Pelita Harapan University.

Method: This research was conducted using mixed method which combines two approaches type. A quantitative approach was the main approach, while qualitative approach acted as facilitatory approach. As many as 106 students of musculoskeletal block participated as sample.

Results: Descriptive analysis showed that students perception was good on teaching quality (77.36%), clear goals (59.43%), and learning ability acquired (88.68%). Meanwhile 68.87% of sample had unsatisfied perception on assessment and on workload (73.58%). The correlation of learning environment perception to learning approach revealed p value>0.05 which was not statistically significant. Qualitative findings showed the role of internal motivation in determining learning approach adopted by student. Internal motivation comprised interest in subject, previous knowledge, and self-esteem.

Conclusion: Student’s perception of learning environment is not a predictor of learning approach applied by student in musculoskeletal block. Internal motivation take part in determining students’ learning approach.

 


Keywords


Earning approach, learning environment, internal motivation

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge Falmer; 2006.
  2. Mattick K, Dennis I, Bligh J. Approach to learning and studying inmedical student: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristic and performance. Med. Educ. 2004;38:535-43.
  3. Emilia O. Students’ approach to learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2006;1(3):61-8.
  4. Cope C, Staehr L. Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an information system learning environtment. Studies in Higher Educ. 2005;30(2):181-97.
  5. Watkins D. Factors influencing the study methods of Australian tertiary students. Higher Educ. 1982;11:369-80.
  6. Ansley J, Long M. The course experience survey 1992 graduates. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services; 1994.
  7. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung YP. The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Brit. J. of Educ. Psychology. 2001;71:133-49.
  8. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabet; 2010.
  9. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research method in education. London: Routledge; 2007.
  10. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University student perception of the learning environment and academic outcome: implication for theory and practice. Studies in Higner Educ. 2002; 27(1): 27-54.
  11. Parpala A, Ylane SL, Komulainen L, Litmanen T, Hirsto L. Students’ approach to learning and their expiriences of teaching learning environment. Brit. J. of Educ. Psychology. 2010; 80:269-82.
  12. Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, Dochy F. Using student centered learning environment to stimulate deep approach to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educ.Research Review. 2010;5: 243-60.
  13. Diseth A, Martinsen O. Approach to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educ. Psychology. 2003;23(2):195-209.
  14. Gijbels D, Segers M, Struyf E. Constructivist learning environment and the (im)possibility to change students’ perception of assessment demands and approach to learning. Instr. Sci. 2008;36: 431-43.
  15. Seale JK, Chapman J, Davey C. The influence of assessments on students’ motivation to leran in therapy degree course. Med. Educ. 2000; 34:614-21.
  16. Baharuddin, Wahyuni EN. Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Arruz Media; 2010.
  17. Papinczak T, Youn L, Groves M, Haynes M. Effects of metacognitive intervention to students’ approach to learning and self-effecacy in first year medical course. Advances in Health Sci. Educ. 2008;13: 213-32.
  18. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students’ learning quest?. Med. Educ. 2004;38: 950-7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25107

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 363 | views : 498

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

JPKI Stats