Penilaian Properti Psikometrik Instrumen Kualitas Hidup (HRQol) pada Populasi Umum: Tinjauan Sistematik

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.41911

Restu Nur Hasanah Haris(1*), Rahmat Makmur(2), Tri Murti Andayani(3), Susi Ari Kristina(4)

(1) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Quality of life (HRQoL) is a measure of a person's health in physical, spiritual, and emotional, and role functions in the society. Measurement of quality of life (HRQoL) is an important thing to understand and evaluate. Measurements are carried out not only on patients but also on the general population with the use of specific or generic instruments. The instrument used requires a psychometric properties test to ensure its validity and reliability. This article aims to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric properties of quality of life (HRQoL) instruments in the general population. Articles were collected in December 1st to 5th, 2018, from Pubmed and Google Scholar. The assessment was carried out using the checklist properties according to the cohen criteria and included the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest, ceiling effect and the level of credibility of the instruments. Among 80 articles obtained there were 24 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument is the most widely used instrument in measuring the quality of life in the general population (26.6%). Some instruments have not been tested according to the criteria, while almost all instruments show a good level of validation of construct validity using convergent and discriminat validity with cronbach alpha values > 0.7. Test-retest reliability provides a good correlation. Some instruments show a ceiling effect. According to the assessment, the SF-36, SF-6D, EQ-5D, SF-12 and PedsQoL instruments are considered as established instruments. Further validation testing is needed to provide and support the measurement of subsequent quality of life (HRQoL) instruments.


Keywords


Psychometric properties; instrumen kualitas hidup; HRQoL; Populasi umum; Psychometric properties; HRQoL Instruments; general population

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Augustin M, Conde Montero E, Zander N, et al. Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regeneration 2017;25(5):852-857. doi:10.1111/wrr.12583
  2. Cruz LN, Camey SA, Hoffmann JF, et al. Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.2011;14(5 Suppl 1):S108-114. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012
  3. Walters SJ. Quality of Life Outcomes in Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: A Practical Guide to Analysis and Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  4. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of  Life Research . 2012;21(4):651-657. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
  5. Kangwanrattanakul K, Auamnoy T. Psychometric testing of the health-related quality of life measurement, SF-36v2, in the general population of Thailand. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. October 2018:1-8. doi:10.1080/14737167.2019.1530595
  6. Garratt AM, Stavem K. Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey. Health Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):51. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0625-9
  7. Khader S, Hourani MM, Al-Akour N. Normative data and psychometric properties of short form 36 health survey (SF-36, version 1.0) in the population of north Jordan. East Mediterr Health Journal. 2011;17(5):368-374.
  8. Thumboo J, Wu Y, Tai E-S, et al. Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic urban Asian population in Singapore. Quality of Life Research. 2013;22(9):2501-2508. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0381-1
  9. Baxter S, Sanderson K, Venn A, Otahal P, Palmer AJ. Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an employed population. Quality of Life Research .2015;24(4):851-870. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0823-4
  10. Lam CLK, Brazier J, McGhee SM. Valuation of the SF-6D Health States Is Feasible, Acceptable, Reliable, and Valid in a Chinese Population. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2008;11(2):295-303. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00233.x
  11. Campolina AG, López RVM, Nardi EP, Ferraz MB. Internal Consistency of the SF-6D as a Health Status Index in the Brazilian Urban Population. Value Health Reg Issues. 2018;17:74-80. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2018.02.003
  12. Shafie AA, Vasan Thakumar A, Lim CJ, Luo N. Psychometric performance assessment of Malay and Malaysian English version of EQ-5D-5L in the Malaysian population. Quality of Life Research. October 2018. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-2027-9
  13. Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Brähler E. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Quality of Life Research.2014;23(2):443-447. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0498-2
  14. Kim TH, Jo M-W, Lee S, Kim SH, Chung SM. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Quality of Life Research. 2013;22(8):2245-2253. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0331-3
  15. Aires MT, Auquier P, Robitail S, Werneck GL, Simeoni M-C. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the VSP-A (Vécu et Santé Perçue de l’Adolescent), a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for adolescents, in a healthy Brazilian population. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:8. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-11-8
  16. Nedjat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R. Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): a population-based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:61. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-61
  17. Suárez L, Tay B, Abdullah F. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment in Singapore. Quality of Life Research. 2018;27(11):2945-2952. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1947-8
  18. Kim S-H, Jo M-W, Ahn J, Ock M, Shin S, Park J. Assessment of psychometric properties of the Korean SF-12 v2 in the general population. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1086. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1086
  19. Limperg PF, Haverman L, van Oers HA, van Rossum MAJ, Maurice-Stam H, Grootenhuis MA. Health related quality of life in Dutch young adults: psychometric properties of the PedsQL generic core scales young adult version. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2014;12:9. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-9
  20. Ferreira PL, Baltazar CF, Cavalheiro L, Cabri J, Gonçalves RS. Reliability and validity of PedsQL for Portuguese children aged 5-7 and 8-12 years. Health Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014;12:122. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0122-3
  21. Vaingankar JA, Subramaniam M, Tan LWL, et al. Psychometric properties and population norms of the positive mental health instrument in a representative multi-ethnic Asian population. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0487-9
  22. Terluin B, Smits N, Brouwers EPM, de Vet HCW. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey. Health Quality of Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):130. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4
  23. Löve J, Andersson L, Moore CD, Hensing G. Psychometric analysis of the Swedish translation of the WHO well-being index. Quality of  Life Research. 2014;23(1):293-297. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0447-0
  24. Kim GR, Netuveli G, Blane D, et al. Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the CASP-19, a measure of quality of life in early old age: the HAPIEE study. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(7):595-609. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.938605
  25. Castellví P, Forero CG, Codony M, et al. The Spanish version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) is valid for use in the general population. Quality of Life Research. 2014;23(3):857-868. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0513-7
  26. Hector RD, Anderson JP, Paul RCP, et al. Evaluation of the validity of the Quality of Well-being Scale in Trinidad and Tobago. West Indian Med J. 2008;57(2):135-140.
  27. Jalenques I, Auclair C, Roblin J, et al. Cross-cultural evaluation of the French version of the LEIPAD, a health-related quality of life instrument for use in the elderly living at home. Quality of Life Research. 2013;22(3):509-520. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0166-y
  28. Jo M-W, Lee H-J, Kim SY, et al. Development and Validation of a Novel Generic Health-related Quality of Life Instrument With 20 Items (HINT-20). J Prev Med Public Health Yebang Uihakhoe Chi. 2017;50(1):38-59. doi:10.3961/jpmph.16.081
  29. Wu C, Gong Y, Wu J, et al. Chinese Version of the EQ-5D Preference Weights: Applicability in a Chinese General Population. PloS One. 2016;11(10):e0164334. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164334
  30. Gregory, R.J. Tes Psikologi Sejarah, Prinsip Dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2013.
  31. Wu L-F, Yang S-H, Koo M. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Spiritual Index of Well-Being in elderly Taiwanese. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):3. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0392-1
  32. Saqib Lodhi F, Raza O, Montazeri A, Nedjat S, Yaseri M, Holakouie-Naieni K. Psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the World Health Organization’s quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:129. doi:10.14196/mjiri.31.129

 



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.41911

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 557 | views : 523

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN PELAYANAN FARMASI (Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

©Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi
Faculty of Pharmacy
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Creative Commons License
View My Stats