Perbandingan Skala Nyeri pada Kuretase antara Pemberian Lidokain Paraservikal dan Intraservikal

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.13872

Yudhistya Ngudi Insan Ksyatria(1*), Heru Pradjatmo(2), Ova Emilia(3)

(1) Gadjah Mada University
(2) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, UGM
(3) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, UGM
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Curettage is a gynecological diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Curettage actions causing sensation of pain although the pain threshold is different for each person. Local anesthesia is an effective choice for various minor gynecological procedures. One of them is paracervical block. Paracervical block reduces pain by blocking nerve impulses across the uterovaginal plexus. Another method is the injection of local anesthetic trough intracervical who works as an anesthetic infiltrating agent, distending the tissue, causing mechanical disruption of nerve impulses. Theoritically, intracervical lidocaine injection will require a lower level of precision than the blockade of peripheral nerves directly, more reliable and reproducible. We measured patient’s pain during curettage usingthe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Method: RCT Location of study: Bantul District Hospital, Wonosari District Hospital, and Banjarnegara Distric Hospital. Result and Discussion: The study included 60 patients who got curettage within inclusion criteria. Every time patients came, we performed randomization and divided the patients into two groups, the control group (paracervical) and intervention group (intracervical), 30 subjects each. VAS was measured 5 minute after curettage was started. Characteristics of subjects in curettage frequency, curettage indication, parity and educational level for both groups are equal, did not differ statistically. The results of the mean pain scale (VAS). In the control group was 42,33±16,583 and 34,33±18,880 on the treatment group. Mean difference was 8 mm, with 95% CI -1.124 to 17.124 and p=0.408. The difference was not significant statistically. The intracervical group has mild pain scale (VAS<44 mm) in 27 of 30 patient, compared to 15 of 30 patients in paracervical group. It result in Relative Risk (RR) of 1,532. Conclusion: Intracervical lidocaine injection can be considered as an alternative local anesthetic on curettage. The average pain scale did not differ significantly with paracervical block. And both of it located in VAS < 44mm (mild pain). Intracervical lidocaine injection even have RR= 1,532 compared with paracervical block to produce mild pain scale (VAS < 44 mm). Keywords: curettage; paracervical;intracervical ;VAS 



References

  1. Hayden, M. Dilation and Curettage (D&C) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Healthwise. WebMD. Retrieved 2012-04-01. 2006.
  2. Mankowski, JL., Kingston, J., Moran, T., Nager, C.W., Lukacz, ES. Paracervical Compared with Intracervical Lidocaine for Suction Curettage. ACOG. 2009. 113: 1052-7.
  3. Vekemans, M. Abortion Guideline. International Planned Parenthood Federation. New York. 2005.
  4. Phittayawechwiwat, W., Thananta. Paracervical Block in Obstetrics and Gynecology. California Medicine. 2007. 420-423.
  5. Nadelberg, R. Paracervical Block. Department of Anesthesia Newton-Wellesley Hospital. Newton. 2007.
  6. Praagh, V. Povey, WG. Paracervical block anaesthesia in labour. Can Anaesth Soc J. May; 1996 (1493): 232-9.
  7. Rattanachaiyanont, M., Leerasiri, P., Indavivadhana, S. Effectiveness of Intrauterine Anesthesia for Pain Relief During Fractional Curettage. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005. 533-539.
  8. Munro, MG. Uterine Anesthesia in Office Setting. Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center. 2008.
  9. Reips UD, Funke F. Interval level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator. BRM. 40(3), 2008. 699-704.
  10. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of Adult Pain. Arthritis Care and Research: Vol. 63, 2011. No. S11: pp. S240-S252.
  11. Tangsiriwatthana T, Sangkomkamhang US, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M.. Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Issue 9. 2013.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.13872

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2188 | views : 1805

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi



Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Indexed by:

 

 



SEKRETARIAT JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI
Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM/RS Dr. Sardjito
Jl. Kesehatan No. 1, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
Tlp: (0274) 511329 / Faks: (0274) 544003
Email: jurnal.kesehatanreproduksi@ugm.ac.id
Cp: Dwi Astuti +6281802698043