Email this article 
Otonomi Keuangan Universitas Negeri Dan Ranking Universitas: Studi Di Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.22146/jgs.48864 Rumiyati Rumiyati(1*)
(1) Program Studi Akuntansi, Departemen Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Sekolah Vokasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Institusi pendidikan tinggi mendapatkan manfaat yang besar dari ranking universitas (Hemsley-Brown et.al., 2016). Efek dari ranking universitas membantu universitas menarik mahasiswa terbaik dan pendanaan penelitian (Wilkins dan Huisman 2012). Sedangkan penentuan ranking universitas di tingkat internasional memiliki bermacam-macam kriteria penilaian, salah satunya adalah jumlah publikasi riset yang terindeks Scopus. Saat ini Pemerintah Indonesia memberikan otonomi pengelolaan keuangan kepada institusi pendidikan tinggi. Apakah otonomi tersebut memiliki peran untuk meningkatkan ranking universitas melalui peningkatan jumlah riset yang terindeks Scopus? Penelitian ini menggunakan data dari 5 (lima) universitas negeri berbadan hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Brawijaya, Universitas Padjajaran, dan Universitas Sumatera Utara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan otonomi keuangan universitas berpengaruh positif terhadap ranking pada level 1% dan pengeluaran penelitian terhadap ranking universitas pada level 5%. Pengeluaran penelitian memediasi penuh (full mediating) hubungan antara otonomi keuangan universitas terhadap ranking universitas.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baron, R.M. dan Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Jornal of Personality and Social Psychology: 1173-1182 Ciancanelli, Penny. 2008. The business of teaching and learning: an accounting perspective. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences: 153-185. Daraio, Cinzia, Andrea Bonaccorsi, dan Léopold Simar. 2015. “Rankings and University Performance: A Conditional Multidimensional Approach.” European Journal of Operational Research: 918–30. Frenken, Koen.,Gaston J. Heimeriks, dan Jarno Hoekman. 2017. “What Drives University Research Performance? An Analysis Using the CWTS Leiden Ranking Data. ” Journal of Informetrics 11: 859–872. Hemsley-Brown, Jane, T.C. Melewar, Bang Nguyen, dan Elizabeth J. Wilson. 2016. “Exploring Brand Identity, Meaning, Image, and Reputation (BIMIR) in Higher Education: A Special Section.” Journal of Business Research: 3019–22. Jöns, Heike, dan Michael Hoyler. 2013. “Global Geographies of Higher Education: The Perspective of World University Rankings.” Geoforum: 45–59. Lukman, R., D. Krajnc, dan P. Glavic. 2010. “University ranking using research, educational, dan environmental indicators”. Journal of Cleaner Production: 619-628 Millot, Benoit. 2015. “International Rankings: Universities vs. Higher Education Systems.” International Journal of Educational Development: 156–65. Morris, R. D. 1987. “Signaling, Agency Theory and Accounting Policy Choice.” Accounting and Business Research: 47–56. Olcay, G.A., dan Bulu, M. 2017. Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: a review of university ranking. Technological Forecasting and Social Change: 153-160. Olobatuyi, Moses E. 2006. A User’s Guide to Path Analysis. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America Inc. Pavel, A.P. 2015. Global university rankings - a comparative analysis. 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, WCBEM. Procedia Economics and Finance: 54-63 Reddy, K.S., En Xie, dan Qingqing Tang. 2016. “Higher Education, High-Impact Research, and World University Rankings: A Case of India and Comparison with China.” Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences: 1–21. Republik Indonesia. 1989. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1989 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. Republik Indonesia. 2012. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. Wicaksono, Teguh Yudo dan Deni Friawan. 2011. Chapter Recent Developments in Higher Education in Indonesia: Issues and challenges in Book titled Financing Higher Education and Economics Development in East Asia. ANU Press Wilkins, Stephen, dan Jeroen Huisman. 2012. “UK business school rankings over the last 30 years (1980–2010): Trends and explanations.” Higher Education: 367–382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jgs.48864
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1252
| 
views : 1274
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Gama Societa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Currently, Jurnal Gama Societa indexed by:
