Pengaruh Mediasi dari Perceived Responsibilty terhadap Hubungan antara Obedience Pressure dan Budgetary Slack

https://doi.org/10.22146/jgs.36737

Sakina Nusarifa Tantri(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to examine the mediating effect of perceived responsibility on the association between obedience pressure and budgetary slack. The questionnaires were distributed in a survey conducted on 100 participants who are living in Indonesia and involved in the companies budget recommendation. The statistical analysis was performed using SEM. The result of this study showed that obedience pressure has a positive significant effect on budgetary slack and negatively affects perceived responsibility, while perceived responsibility has a negative significant effect on budgetary slack. Further analysis on mediating variable showed that perceived responsibility partially mediated the relationship between obedience pressure and budgetary slack.

 

Keyword: obedience pressure, budgetary slack, perceived responsibility, mediating variable, SEM


Keywords


obedience pressure, budgetary slack, perceived responsibility, mediating variable, SEM

Full Text:

PDF


References

Anand, S. (2008). Essentials of Corporate Governance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Anthony, R. N. & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control System (12th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill. Blass, T. (1991). Understanding Behavior in The Milgram Obedience Experiment: The Role of Personality, Situations, and Their Interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 3, 398-413. Brownell, P. & McInnes, M. (1986). Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 587-600. Collins, F., Munter, P, & Finn, D. W. (1987). The Budgeting Games People Play. The Accounting Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 29-49. Damrongsukniwat, P., Kunpanitchakit, D., & Durongwatana, S. (2015). The Measurement of Budgetary Slack: The Empirical Evidence of Listed Company in Thailand. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol. 3, No. 2. Davis, S., DeZoort, F. T., & Kopp, L. S. (2006). The Effect of Obedience Pressure and Perceived Responsibility on Management Accountants’ Creation of Budgetary Slack. Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 18, 2006, pp. 19–35. Douglas, P. C. & Wier, B. (2000). Integrating Ethical Dimensions into a Model of Budgetary Slack Creation. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 267-277. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal Causation. New York: Academic Press. Dunk, A. S. (1993). The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on the Relation between Budgetary Participation and Slack. The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 400-410. Dunk, A. S. & Perera, H. (1997). The Incidence of Budgetary Slack: A Field Study Exploration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10. Frezatti, F., Beck, F., & Da Silva, J. O. (2013). Perceptions About the Creation of Budgetary Slack in a Participatory Budget Process. Journal of Education and Research in Accounting, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 322-341. Grediani, E. & Sugiri, S. (2013). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan dan Tanggungjawab Persepsian pada Penciptaan Budgetary Slack. Jurnal Akuntansi & Manajemen, Vol. 24, No. 3, hal. 143-153. Hartmann, F. G. H. & Maas, V. S. (2010). Why Business Unit Controllers Create Budget Slack: Involvement in Management, Social Pressure, and Machiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 27–49. Hartono, J. (2013). Pedoman Survei Kuesioner. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Huda, K., Sinarwati, N. K., & Herawati, N. T. (2014). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran dengan Budaya Organisasi sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi pada PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero) Singaraja. e-Journal S1 Akuntansi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 2, No. 1. Jamilah, S., Fanani, Z., & Chandrarin, G. (2007). Pengaruh Gender, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgment. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makassar, Indonesia. Kelley, H.H. & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution Theory and Research. Annual Reviews. Psychology. 31: 457-501. Kennis, I. (1979). Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance. The Accounting Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 707-721. Lord, A. T. & DeZoort, F. T. (2001). The Impact of Commitment and Moral Reasoning on Auditors’ Responses to Social Influence Pressure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26, pp. 215–235. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67, 371-78. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Onsi, M. (1973). Factor Analysis of Behavioral Variables Affecting Budgetary Slack. The Accounting Review. Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 535-548. Ponemon, L. A. (1992). Auditor Underreporting of Time and Moral Reasoning: An Experimental-lab Study. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp. 171–189. Sholihin, M. & Ratmono, D. (2013). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 601-617. Weiner, B. (1980). A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), pp. 186-200. Young, S. M. (1985). Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Asymmetric Information on Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 829-842. Yuen, C. Y. (2004). Goal characteristics, Communication and Reward Systems, and Managerial Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 517-532.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jgs.36737

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1820 | views : 9266

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Gama Societa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Currently, Jurnal Gama Societa indexed by: