Status gizi, aktivitas fisik, dan prestasi akademik siswa SMA gakin dan non-gakin di Kota Bitung

Daniel Robert; Abidillah Mursyid; Emy Huriyati

doi:10.22146/ijcn.17559

Status gizi, aktivitas fisik, dan prestasi akademik siswa SMA gakin dan non-gakin di Kota Bitung

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijcn.17559

Daniel Robert^(1*), Abidillah Mursyid⁽²⁾, Emy Huriyati⁽³⁾

(1) Politeknik Kesehatan Manado
(2) Politeknik Kesehatan Yogyakarta
(3) Program Studi Ilmu Gizi Kesehatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: A good nutritional status of students will greatly support their physical activities. Social economic status of a family may affect intake of nutrient, energy, and protein which can bring impact on nutritional status. Good nutritional status is necessary for teenagers to maintain health and support physical activities. Senior high school students from poor and non poor families may have different nutritional status, physical activities, and academic achievement.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to identify differences in nutritional status, physical activities, and academic achievement of students from poor and non poor families at Bitung Municipality and relationship between intake of energy and protein and nutritional status, physical activities, and academic achievement of students from poor and non poor families.

Methods: The study was observational with cross sectional design. Population and samples were senior high school students of 16–18 years old (from database) from poor and non poor families. Total samples were 314 students taken using stratified random sampling technique. The study was conducted in September–December 2005. Data were analyzed using chi-square, t-test, and linear regression with significance level 95% and processed using computer software.

Results: There was a significant difference in nutritional status, light physical activity, academic achievement in poor and non poor highschool students (p<0,05), but there was no significant difference in the medium and heavy physical activity (p>0,05). There was also a relationship between confounding variable of energy intake with nutritional status, father’s job with light activity, father’s education and job with medium activity, father and mother’s education, father’s job, and energy intake with academic achievement. There was no relationship between confounding variable with heavy physical activity (p>0,05).

Conclusion: There was differences in nutritional status in light physical activity and academic achievement between students from poor and those from non poor families.

Keywords

nutritional status; physical activities; academic; achievement; poor families

Full Text:

PDF

References

Almatsier S. Prinsip Dasar Ilmu Gizi. Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama;2003.

Soetjiningsih. Tumbuh Kembang Remaja dan Permasalahannya. Jakarta:Sagung Seto; 2004.

Enoch M. Karena Kurang Gizi Kemampuan Belajar Anak Berkurang. Medika 1989;(3):287-90.

Soejono SM, Masrun, Hadi S. Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa PMDK dan Non-PMDK (Ditinjau dari Segi Intelegensi, Kebiasaan Belajar, Pendidikan Orang Tua, Status Sekolah dan Jenis Kelamin di FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Yogyakarta: BPPSUGM; 1989.

Widodo US dan Syafrudin. Kaitan Tingkat Kegiatan Fisik Remaja dan Kaitannya Dengan Status Gizi. Bogor: Puslitbang Gizi; 1989.

Depkes RI. Penelitian Gizi dan Makanan. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Gizi; 2000.

BPS Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional Sulawesi Utara 2003. Sulawesi Utara: BPS Provinsi Sulut; 2003.

Pemerintah Kota Bitung. Pembebasan Dana Pendidikan. Surat Keputusan Walikota Bitung. Bitung; Tanggal 21 Oktober 2004. Nomor: 420/PDK/642.

Lemeshow S, Hosmer D, Klar J. 1990. Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies. (Terjemahan) Pramono D. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 1997. h. 49-52.

Willet W. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York:Oxford University Press;1990.

Prista A, Maia JAR, Damasceno A, Beunen G. Anthropometric Indicator of Nutritional Status: Implication for Fitness, Activity, and Health in School Age Children and Adolescents from Maputo, Mosambique. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:952-9.

Soekirman. Ilmu Gizi dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional; 2000.

Azwar A, editor. Aspek Kesehatan dan Gizi dalam Ketahanan Pangan. Prosiding WNPG VIII; 17-19 Mei 2004; Jakarta.

Hadi H. Gizi Lebih sebagai Tantangan Baru dan Implikasinya terhadap Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan Nasiona. Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia 2004;1(2):51-8.

Benefice E, Ndiaye G. Relationships between Antrhopometry, Cardiorespiratoty Fitness Indices and Physical Activity Levels in Different Age and Sex Groups in Rural Senegal (West Africa). Ann Hum Biol 2005;32:366-82.

Goran MI. Measurement Issues Related to Studies of Chilhood Obesity: Assessment of Body Composition, Body Fat Distribution, Physical Activity, and Food Intake. Pediatr 1998;101:505-18.

Huriyati E, Hadi H, Julia M. Aktivitas Fisik pada Remaja SLTP Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten Bantul serta Hubungannya dengan Kejadian Obesitas. Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia 2004;1(2):59-66.

Nurachmah E. Nutrisi dalam Keperawatan. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2001.

Treuth SM, Hou N, Young DR, Maynard LM. Accelerometry Measured Activity or Sedentary Time and Overweigth in Rular Boy and Girls. Obes Res 2005;13:1606-14.

Faith MS, Leone MA, Ayers TS, Heo M, Pietrobelli A. Weight Criticism during Physical Activity, Coping Skills, and Reported Physical Activity in Children. Pediatr 2002;110:e23-e23.

Arvidson D, Slinde F, Hulthen L. Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents Validate Against Doubly Labeled Water. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;59:376-83.

Ekelund U, Aman J, Yngve A, Renman C, Westerterp K, Sjostrom M. Physical Activity but Not Energy Expenditure is Reduced in Obese Adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:935-41.

Bennett GG, Wolyn KY, Viswanath K, Askew S, Puleo E, Emmons KM. Television Viewing and Pedometer- Determined Physical Activity among Multiethic Residents of Low-Income Housing. Am J Public Health 2006;96(9):1681-85.

WHO. Pendidikan Kesehatan; Pedoman Kesehatan Dasar. Bali: Universitas Udayana; 1988.

Suyono S. Hubungan Timbal Balik antara Kegemukan dan Berbagai Penyakit. Dalam: Suyono

S. Kegemukan Masalah dan Penanggulangannya. Jakarta:FKUI;1986.

Hawadi RA. A-Z Program Percepatan Belajar dan Anak Berbakat Intelektual. Jakarta:Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia;2004.

Latinulu S, Kartika V. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Motorik Anak Usia 12-18 Bulan di Keluarga Miskin dan Tidak Miskin. PGM 2002;25(2):38-48.

Jelliffe DB. Kesehatan Anak di Daerah Tropis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara;1994.

Santoso S, Ranti AL. Kesehatan dan Gizi. Jakarta; Rineka Cipta:1999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijcn.17559