A Model of Fish Consumption Among Indonesian Youth with the Moderation on Their Perception of Fish Quality Assurance


Ika Nur Putriantini(1*), Aldino Dityanawarman(2), Inaiyah Inaiyah(3), Hafit Rahman(4)

(1) Technical Inspection Unit of Yogyakarta, Fish Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Technical Inspection Unit of Yogyakarta, Fish Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Technical Inspection Unit of Yogyakarta, Fish Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Technical Inspection Unit of Yogyakarta, Fish Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


This study provides a relevant examination of fish consumption among Indonesian youth; it contributes to their perception of fish quality assurance. A cross-sectional sample of Indonesian youth scholars between 17 and 26 years old (n = 1.163) responded to an online questionnaire validly from February to March 2021. Structural equation modelling was used to estimate the direction and strength of relationships between variables. The results demonstrate that fish availability, health involvement, fish consumption in childhood, sensory beliefs, and price correlated significantly with fish consumption among Indonesian youth, but that relationship was mediated by attitude to consume fish. Social pressure also has a significant correlation to fish consumption among Indonesian youth. Meanwhile, we found that Indonesian youth's perception of fish quality assurance negatively moderates the relationship between fish and fish consumption. This perception of fish quality assurance is likely not to affect the real-world relationship between the desire to consume fish and fish consumption. Understanding the role different variables play in their fish consumption habits may provide helpful insights for the government to develop strategies for increasing the final goal, which is the intake of fish among young consumers.


attitude, fish consumption, Indonesian youth, antecedents, moderation, perception of fish quality assurance

Full Text:



Arthatiani, F.Y & N. Kusnadi. 2018. Analysis of fish consumption patterns and fish demand model based on household’s characteristics in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosek Kelautan dan Perikanan. 13 (1): 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v13i1.6967

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2019. Berita resmi statistik. Bps.Go.Id, 27, 1–52. https://papua.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2018/05/07/336/indeks-pembangunan-manusia-provinsi-papua-tahun-2017.html

Birch, D & M. Lawley. 2012. Buying seafood: Understanding barriers to purchase across consumption segments. Food Quality and Preference. 26 (1): 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.004

Birch, L.L & J.O. Fisher. 1998. Development of eating behaviour among children. Pediatrics. 101: 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.S2.539

Brunsø, K., W. Verbeke, S.O. Olsen & L.F. Jeppesen. 2009. Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations: Exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium. British Food Journal. 111 (7): 699-716. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910972387

Cangur, S & I. Ercan. 2015. Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modelling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14 (1): 152-167. https://doi.org/10.22237/JMASM%2F1430453580

Chin, C. 1998. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. 295-336 p

Dawson, J.F. 2014. Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How. Journal of Business and Psychology. 29 (1): 1-19. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7

Djunaidah, I.S. 2017. Tingkat konsumsi Ikan di Indonesia: Ironi di Negeri Bahari. Jurnal Penyuluhan Perikanan dan Kelautan. 11 (1): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.33378/jppik.v11i1.82

FAO. 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. In Fao. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en

Fornell, C. & D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18 (1): 39-50. https://doi.org/3151312

Garson, G.D. 2016. Partial least square: Regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Blue Book Series. School of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University. The United States of America. 262 p

Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins & V.G. Kuppelwieser. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review. 26 (2): 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Höck, M & C.M. Ringle. 2006. Strategic networks in the software industry: An empirical analysis of the value continuum. IFSAM 8th World Congress, Berlin.

Honkanen, P., S.O. Olsen & B. Verplanken. 2005. Intention to consume seafood - The importance of habit. Appetite. 45 (2): 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.005

Ketchen, D.J. 2013. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling. Long Range Planning. 46 (1-2): 184-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002

Leek, S., S. Maddock & G. Foxall. 2000. Situational determinants of fish consumption. British Food Journal. 102 (1): 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700010310614

Marshall, D & R. Bell. 2004. Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice, and other constructs. Food Quality and Preference. 15 (7-8): 871-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.06.003

Mennella, J.A., C.P. Jagnow & G.K. Beauchamp. 2001. Prenatal and postnatal flavour learning by human infants. Pediatrics. 107 (6): 88. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.6.e88

Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) .2018, accessed 12 July 2021, < https://kkp.go.id/djpt/ppnsungailiat/artikel/6676-gemarikan-gemar-memasyarakatkan-makan-ikan-upaya-peningkatan-gizi-sejak-dini>

Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) .2021, accessed 12 July 2021, < https://kkp.go.id/puslatluh/artikel/27693-lagi-kkp-gencarkan-konsumsi-ikan-melalui-pelatihan-masyarakat-di-24-provinsi>

Nicklaus, S. 2009. Development of food variety in children. Appetite. 52 (1): 253-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.018

Olsen, S.O. 2001. Consumer involvement in seafood as family meals in Norway: An application of the expectancy-value approach. Appetite. 36 (2): 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0393

Olsen, S.O. 2003. Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption: The mediating role of attitude, health and involvement and convenience. Food Quality and Preference. 14 (3): 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00055-1

Rortveit, A.W & S.O. Olsen. 2007. The role of consideration set size in explaining fish consumption. Appetite. 49 (1): 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.005

Scholderer, J & K.G. Grunert. 2001. Does generic advertising work? A systematic evaluation of the Danish campaign for fresh fish. Aquaculture Economics and Management. 5 (5-6): 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300109380293

Schwartz, M.B & R. Puhl. 2003. Childhood obesity: A societal problem to solve. Obesity Reviews. 4 (1): 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00093.x

Thong, N.T & S.O. Olsen. 2012. Attitude toward and consumption of fish in Vietnam. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 18 (2): 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.653778

Thorsdottir, F., K. Sveinsdottir, F.H. Jonsson, G. Einarsdottir, I. Thorsdottir & E. Martinsdottir. 2012. A model of fish consumption among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 29 (1): 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211193000

Verbeke, W & I. Vackier. 2005. Individual determinants of fish consumption: Application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 44 (1): 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006

Verbeke, W., I. Vermeir & K. Brunsø. 2007. Consumer evaluation of fish quality as basis for fish market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference. 18 (4): 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.005

Wijaya, S. 2019. Indonesian food culture mapping: A starter contribution to promote Indonesian culinary tourism. Journal of Ethnic Foods. 6 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-019-0009-3

Yeung, R.M.W & J. Morris. 2001. Consumer perception of food risk in chicken meat. Nutrition & Food Science. 31 (6): 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346650110409092

Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1985. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research. `12 (3): 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/208520

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jfs.68366

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2271 | views : 317


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Perikanan Universitas Gadjah Mada

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Perikanan Universitas Gadjah Mada (print ISSN 0853-6384; online ISSN 2502-5066) is published by Department of Fisheries, Universitas Gadjah Mada in collaboration with Semnaskan UGM (Seminar Nasional Tahunan Hasil Perikanan dan Kelautan) and ISMFR (International Symposium on Marine and Fisheries Research).


View My Stats