Evaluation of community empowerment program for elderly care: Lessons learned from PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.62541

Syamsumin Kurnia Dewi(1*)

(1) Akademi Fisioterapi "YAB" Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The current paradigm and health development policy in Indonesia have changed from development to empowerment. The community empowerment program for elderly care "PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai" is a leading community empowerment program in the subdistrict of Bambanglipuro, Bantul Regency. This study was conducted to evaluate The PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai program based on input, process, output, and outcome. This cross-sectional study was conducted in December 2019. Data on the input, process, and output were collected by interviewing three caretakers with a questionnaire and tracking organizational documents and activity reports, and observing activities implementation. The outcome in the form of 63 participants’ quality of life was measured by the Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively. Evaluation of the input showed: most of the caretakers were male (77.33%), entrepreneurs, with senior high school education level (26.67%). Most of the facilities and infrastructure belong to the organization, the principal source of funds from Yayasan Kesejahteraan Sosial Teratai Jakarta, which were sufficient. Evaluation of the process showed: all main activities were well-scheduled and conducted routinely and documented. Evaluation of the output showed: the level of participation in each activity was between 67.61% - 100.00%. The outcome evaluation showed that the mean score of quality of life domains was: Physical Functioning (88.17 ± 20.29), Role-Physical (71.03 ± 27.75), Bodily Pain (66.98 ± 17.47), General Health (54.76 ± 12.65), Vitality (64.29 ± 15.99), Social Functioning (71.14 ±16.08), Role-Emotional (68.05 ± 34.71), and Mental Health (72.44 ± 14.57). The PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai has sufficient capital input, a fair implementation process of activities, and produced exceptional outputs and outcomes.


Keywords


Community empowerment; elderly care; program evaluation

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Sulaeman E. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Bidang Kesehatan: Teori Dan Implikasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2016.

2. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

3. Sutisna E, Ravik S, Bhisma K, et al. Model pemberdayaan masyarakat bidang kesehatan, Studi Program Desa Siaga. J Kesehat Masy Nas. 2012;7(4):186-192.

4. Restuastuti T, Zahtamal, Chandra F, Restila R. Analisis pemberdayaan masyarakat di bidang kesehatan. J Kesehat Melayu. 2017:14-19.

5. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kesejahteraan Lanjut Usia.

6. Pusat Penanggulangan Krisis Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Pedoman Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Penanggulangan Krisis Kesehatan. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2015.

7. Mustika IW. Membangun Kebijakan Kesehatan Lansia Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. J Skala Husada. 2016;13(1):1-12.

8. Setiti SG. Pelayanan Lanjut Usia Berbasis Kekerabatan (Studi Kasus Pada Lima Wilayah Di Indonesia ). Puslitbang Kesos RI. 2007:153-167.

9. Komisi Nasional Lanjut Usia RI. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Posyandu Lanjut Usia. Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Lanjut Usia RI; 2010.

10. PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai. Profil PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai. Yogyakarta: PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai; 2010.

11. Dewi SK, Kusnanto H, Pramantara IDP, Rahayujati TB. Status partisipasi dan kualitas hidup peserta pos pelayanan terpadu lanjut usia. Kes Mas J Kesehat Masy. 2017;11(1):28-40.

12. Irmawan. Pelayanan sosial bagi lanjut usia berbasis masyarakat desa. J PKS. 2017;16(4):359- 368.

13. Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. Vol 4. Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto; 2011.

14. PERDOSSI. Panduan Praktik Klinik: Diagnosis Dan Penatalaksanaan Dimensia. Jakarta: PERDOSSI; 2015. http://www.perdossi.or.id.

15. Melani F, Hasrat KT, Widyasti BAC, Suhadi R. Evaluasi kualitas hidup responden hipertensi usia 40–75 tahun menggunakan instrumen SF36 di kecamatan Kalasan, Sleman, DIY. J Farm Klin Indones. 2017;6(3):200-209.

16. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation. Vol 7.; 2000. Wiley Online Library.

17. Dahlan MS. Statistik Untuk Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan: Deskriptif, Bivariat, Dan Multivariat Dilengkapi Aplikasi Menggunakan SPSS. 6th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2014.

18. PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai. Data Pengurus Dan Peserta PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai Tahun 2019. Yogyakarta: PUSAKA Wahyu Teratai; 2019.

19. Nadzir M. Membangun Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Di Pesantren. Econ J Ekon Islam. 2015;6(1):37- 56.

20. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 72 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Kesehatan Nasional.

21. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan dan Pembinaan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan.

22. Darmawan ES, Junadi P, Bachtiar A, Najib M. Mengukur Tingkat Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Sektor Kesehatan. J Kesehat Masy Nas. 2012;7(2):91-96.

23. Trisnowati H. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat untuk Pencegahan Faktor Risiko Penyakit Tidak Menular (Studi pada Pedesaan di Yogyakarta). J MKMI. 2018;14(1):17-25.

24. Naufal A, Kusumastuti YI. Evaluasi program pos pemberdayaan keluarga (Posdaya): studi kasus Posdaya bina sejahtera di kelurahan Pasirmulya, kecamatan Bogor Barat, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat). J Penyul. 2010;6(2).

25. Ariyani T. Identifikasi Faktor Perilaku Dalam Pemanfaatan Posyandu Lansia Di Puskesmas Bambanglipuro, Kabupaten Bantul, D. I. Yogyakarta. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2011.

26. Post M. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(3):167-180.

27. Dewi SK. Level aktivitas fisik dan kualitas hidup warga lanjut usia. Media Kesehat Masy Indones. 2018;14(3):241-250.

28. Motl RW, McAuley E. Physical activity, disability, and quality of life in older adults. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(2):299-308.

29. Pernambuco CS, Gao P, Li H. Quality of life, elderly and physical activity. Health (Irvine Calif). 2012;04(02):88-93.

30. Donoghue O, Connell MO, Kenny RA. Walking to wellbeing: physical activity, social participation, and psychological health in Irish adults aged 50 years and older. Dublin; 2016. https:// tilda.tcd.ie/publications/reports/pdf/Report_ PhysicalActivity.pdf.

31. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

32. Pucci G, Reis RS, Rech CR, Hallal PC. Quality of life and physical activity among adults: populationbased study in Brazilian adults. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(9):1537-1543.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.62541

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 820 | views : 568

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.