Evaluasi Kualitas Reviu Laporan Keuangan Kementerian: Studi pada Inspektorat Kementerian Pariwisata

https://doi.org/10.22146/jaap.35334

Dewi Puspasari(1*), Arief Surya Irawan(2)

(1) Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The review of the financial statements carried out by the inspectorate has a major role in assisting the realization of a clean, transparent and accountable government, through the supervision of qualified state finances. This study aimed to evaluate the review quality of the ministry financial statements by the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Tourism and analyze the factors that become obstacles faced by the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Tourism in conducting the review of the financial statements. This study identified the review quality conducted by the parties involved in the review process of the ministry financial statements. The parties are the inspectorate as the reviewer and the work unit (satker) reviewed.

The results indicated that the review quality conducted by the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Tourism is included in the category of good review quality. The level of compliance showing the review quality from the inspectorate is 88, 82% and from the satker is 85%. Although the review of the Ministry of Tourism has a good quality, in 2012, however, it still got WDP opinion and disclaimer in the year 2013-2014. This is because the reviews and audits have different goals and procedures. The Inspectorate of the Ministry of Tourism does not review SPI so there is no SPI review value. Meanwhile BPK considered Ministry of Tourism SPI to determine audit procedures with the aim to provide opinion on the financial statements. During this period, the implementation of the review faced the obstacles of the delay in submitting financial statements, nomenclature changes, limited auditor numbers and competencies, limited time, and lack of budget support. 


Keywords


kualitas reviu, kendala reviu, peran APIP, Sistem Pengendalian Intern

Full Text:

PDF


References

Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J. & Beasley, M.S., 2012, Auditing: Assurance services an integrated approach, Prentice Hall Business Publishing, New Jersey.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2013, Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI Tahun 2013, Jakarta.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2014, Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI Tahun 2014, Jakarta.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2015, Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI Tahun 2015, Jakarta.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2015, Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI Atas Laporan Keuangan Kementerian Pariwisata Tahun 2014 Nomor 133A/ HP/XVI/05/2015, Jakarta

Behn, B. K., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R. & Hermanson, R. H., 1997, 'The determinants of audit client satisfaction among clients of Big 6 firms', Accounting Horizons 11 (1), 7-24.

Creswell, J.W., 2014, Research Design (Qualitative, Quantitative and Mix Methods Approaches), Sage Publications, London.

Dona, S., 2013, 'Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi pada Inspektorat Kota Payakumbuh)', Tesis tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Gau, A.I., 2016, Analisis Kualitas Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (Studi pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Klaten), Tesis tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Hartono, J., 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I. & Bailey, A., 2011, Qualitative research method, SAGE Publications, London.

Herdiansyah, H., 2015, Wawancara, Observasi, dan Focus Groups: sebagai Instrumen Penggalian Data Kualitatif, PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Depok.

Kuntadi, C., 2009, 'Peningkatan Kapabilitas Auditor Internal dalam Pelaksanaan Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan', Majalah Dwiwulanan BPK RI, Nomor118/Edisi Agustus-September 2009/Tahun XXVII, ISSN 0216-8154

Miles, M.B. dan Huberman, A.M., 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage Publica-tions, Beverly Hills.

Moleong, L.J., 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Mulyadi, 2002, Auditing, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2006, Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perbendaharaan Nomor PER-44/PB/2006 tentang Pedoman Pelaksana-an Reviu Laporan Keuangan Kementerian Negara/Lembaga, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2008, Peraturan Peme-rintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2008, Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor PER/05/M.PAN/03/2008 tentang Standar Audit APIP, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2010, Peraturan Peme-rintah Nomor 71/2010 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2010, Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 41/PMK.09/2010 tentang Standar Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan Kementerian Negara/Lembaga, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2012, Peraturan Menteri PAN & RB Nomor 28 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Telaah Sejawat, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2015, Peraturan Menteri Pariwisata Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Pariwisata, Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia, 2016, Peraturan Menteri Pariwisata Nomor 6 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah di Lingkungan Kementerian Pariwisata, Jakarta.

Rai, I.G.A., 2008, Audit kinerja pada sektor publik: Konsep, praktik, dan studi kasus, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M., 1984, Qualitative data analysis, SAGE Publi-cations, Beverly Hills.

Ritonga, I. T., 2010, Reviu laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah, Yogyakarta, Lembaga Kajian Manajemen Pemerintah Daerah.

Tjiptono, F., 2007, Strategi pemasaran, Yogyakarta, Andi Offset.

Windarsih, D., 2015, 'Hubungan kualitas reviu laporan keuangan dengan temuan peme¬rik-saan BPK pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/ Kota se-DIY', Tesis tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jaap.35334

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4600 | views : 8299

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik (JAAP)