Dimensions and Factors of Contemporary Geography Learning Climate at Senior High School
Mukminan Mukminan(1*)
(1) Department of Geography Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study develops the dimensions and factors of the learning climate of contemporary geography at the senior high school through the process of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). This research uses Research and Development (R & D). Research respondents involved 595 experts and practitioners of geography learning in Yogyakarta, determined using stratified-purposive sampling. The calculation results give the average value of Aiken logical validity of 0.85, the value of Measure of Sampling Adequacy of 0.789, Bartlett's test of sphericity 0.000 <0. 05, a Chi square of 37.6 with df=25, p. value=0.05061, RMSEA of 0.058 <0.08, and a t value of 4.78 > 1.96 and with a significance level of 5%. These calculations have been eligible for EFA analyses. The results classify the geography learning climate into four dimensions with 16 factors. The dimensions are: (1) Student-centered learning, (2) positive relationships among students, (3) positive relationships between teachers and students, and (4) developing and strengthening classroom rules. Each dimension consists of 6, 4, 2, and 4 factors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aiken, Lewis R. (1996). Rating Scales and Checklist: Evaluation Behavior Personality, and Attitude. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Anthamatten, Peter. (2010). Spatial thinking Concepts in Early Grade-Level Geography Standards. Journal of Geography 109: 169–180
Aththibby, Arif Rahman, Alarifin, and Dedi Hidayatullah. (2015). Pengaruh Permainan dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik. JRKPF UAD Vol.2 No.2 Oktober 2015, 38-41
BPSDM. (2014). Buku Pedoman Guru: Peminatan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Geografi. Jakarta: BPSDM
Buldur, Serkan. (2014). An Investigation of the Relationship between the Students’ Perceptions about Classroom Assessment Environment and their Achievement-Goal Orientations: Gender Perspective. Education and Science 2014, Vol 39, No 176, 213-225
Cavanagh, Robert F. (2015) A unified model of student engagement in classroom learning and classroom learning environment: one measure and one underlying construct. Learning Environ Res (2015) 18:349–361
Church, M. A, Elliot, A.J & Gable, S.L (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, Achievement Goals and Achievement Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol.93, No.43-54.
Church, M. A, Elliot, A.J & Gable, S.L (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, Achievement Goals and Achievement Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol.93, No.43-54
Cox (2006). The Quality of Instructional Program. Alaska: National educational Program. Diambil dari: www. Ak.nea.org/excelence/coxquality.
Davidson, Gill. (2002). Planning for enquiry. In Magie Smith (Editor), Book of Aspects of Teaching Secondary Geography, Perspectives on practice, pp 77-92. London. RoutledgeFalmer
Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Costruct. In A. J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck, Handbook of Competence and Motivation, pp.52-72. New York: The Guilford Press
Falsario, Herminia N, Raul F. Muyong, & Jenny S. Nuevaespaña (2014). Classroom Climate and Academic Performance of Education Students. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines March 6-8, 2014
Harackiewics, J. M, Barron, K. E, Pintrich, P. R, Elliot, A.J & Thrash, T.M (2002). Revision od Achievement Goal Theory: Necessary and Illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.94, p.638-645.
Heffron, Susan Gallagher and Downs, Robert M. (2012) Geography for Life: National Geography Standards. Washington D.C. National Council for Geographic Education.
Hergenhahn & Olson. (2010). Theories of Learning (Teori Belajar) (alih bahasa: Tri Wibowo B. S.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Hopkin, John. (2011). Geography in Progress. Geography. Vol. 96 Part 3, Autumn. pp. 116-123
Janelle Donald G. dan Goodchild Michael F. (2010). Toward Critical Spatial Thinking in The Social Sciences And Humanities. GeoJournal 75. 3–13
Jo, Injeong & Bednarz, Sarah Witham. (2014) Dispositions Toward Teaching Spatial thinking Through Geography: Conceptualization and an Exemplar Assessment. Journal of Geography, 113: 5. 198-207
Jo, Injeong, Bednarz Sarah, & Metoyer Sarah. (2010). Selecting and Designing Questions to Facilitate Spatial thinking. The Geography Teacher 7 (2), 49-55.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 23 tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kirby John R dan Lawson Michael J (editor). (2013) Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Dispositions, Instruction, and Learning Processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lambert, David dan Morgan, John. (2010). Teaching Geography (11–18): A Conceptual Approach. New York: Open University Press
Lapper, M. R, Corpus, J. H & Iyengar, S. I. (2005). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientation in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.97, No.2, 184-196
Lee, Jongwon and Bednarz, Robert. (2012). Components of Spatial thinking: Evidence from a Spatial thinking Ability Test. Journal of Geography 111: 15–26
Locke, E. A & Latham, G. P (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
Mahat Hanifah, Yazid Saleh, Mohmadisa Hashim and Nasir Nayan. (2016). Model Development on Awareness of Education for Sustainable Schools Development in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Geography, Vol. 48 No. 1, June 2016: 37 - 46
Mahmudah Siti, Budiman Christiananta, dan Anis Eliyana. (2017). Organizational Climate and Student Achievement: A Study at The Vocational College in Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1; January 2017. 34-50
McGregor & Elliot, (2002) Achievement Goals as Predictors of Achievement-Relevant Processes Prior to Task Engangement. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.94, No.2, p.381-395.;
Mohan Lindsey, Mohan Audrey, and David Uttal. (2015). Research on Thinking and Learning with Maps and Geospatial Technologies. Geo progressions. USA: American Association of Geographer
Mooi, Erik and Sarstedt, Marko. (2014). A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics (2nd Edition). London: Springer
Mucherah, Winnie and Frazier, Andrea D. (2003) How Teachers Perceive Their Classroom Environments and Student Goal Orientation: A Look into High School Biology Classrooms in Kenya. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science 3(1): 1-17, 2013
Mukminan. (2011). Evaluasi Implementasi KTSP Pada Pembelajaran Geografi SMA di kota Yogyakarta. Cakrawala Pendidikan, November 2011, Th. XXX, Nomor 3. 490 – 504.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higher order thinking in social studies: A rationale for the assessment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies 22 (1): 41–56.
Nursa’ban, Muhammad, Suparmini, dan Sriadi. (2012). Evaluasi Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Geografi SMA Kabupaten Bantul. Socia. Volume 11, nomor 2, September 2012. 165-182
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan
Rawling, E. (2000) National Curriculum geography: new opportunities for curriculum development, in A. Kent (ed.) Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Rohani, Ahmad. (2004). Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta. PT Rineka Cipta
Rumini. Sri. dkk. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta. UNY Press
Rusman. (2010), Model-Model Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Santrock, J. W. (2008). Educational Psychology. (3rd edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2005. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan, Bandung: PT Rosda Karya.
Slameto (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhu. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Slavin, Robert E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik (Alih Bahasa: Marianto Samosir). Jakarta: Indeks
Soltanzadeh, Liele, Seyed Reza Nazari Hashemi dan Sakineh Shahi. (2013). The effect of active learning on academic achievement motivation in high schools students, Department of Management, Khozestan Research and Science Branch, Islamic Azad University,Shahid Beheshti University,Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran Scholars Research Library Archives of Applied Science Research, 2013,Journals, 5 (6):127-13.
Suhardjo, A.J. dkk. (2013). Filsafat Sains Geografi. Yogyakarta. Deepublish
Tumanggor, Raja Oloan and Dariyo, Agoes [2015] Pengaruh Iklim Kelas Terhadap Resiliensi Akademik, Mastery Goal Orientation dan Prestasi Belajar. Prosiding. Seminar Psikologi & Kemanusiaan. Psychology Forum UMM, ISBN: 978-979-796-324-8, pp 262-268
Withers, Charles W.J. (2009). Place and the ‘‘Spatial Turn’’ in Geography and in History. Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 70, Number 4 (October 2009). Pp 637-658
Yurdabakan Irfan, Mustafa Er, Ugur Altunay. (2012). The Effects Of Active Learning On Foreign Language Self-Concept And Reading Comprehension Achievement, Turkish Air Force Academy, Dokuz Eylul University, International Journal On New Trends In Education And Their Implications. October 2012 Volume: 3 Issue: 4 Article: 04 ISSN 1309-6249.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.34567
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3827 | views : 2818Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Indonesian Journal of Geography
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 225/E/KPT/2022, Vol 54 No 1 the Year 2022 - Vol 58 No 2 the Year 2026 (accreditation certificate download)
ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print)
IJG STATISTIC