The Dominance of the Agency Model on Financing Decisions

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.6908

Bramantyo Djohanputro(1*)

(1) PPM School of Management
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


There are some issues about how companies consider their financing. These issues are related to the amount, source, type, and the structure of such financing. So far, there is no uniform model that is able to explain how companies deal with these issues. There are three competing, dominant theories of financing decision making, i.e. the Pecking Order Theory, the Static Trade-off Theory, and the Agency Model Theory. This study attempts to explore which theory explains the best way for companies in the consumer industry to decide their financing method. There are five hypotheses to be tested in this study. Using data from public listed companies on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2011, it seems that the Agency Model Theory is more dominant than the other two theories in explaining the way companies fulfill their financing needs.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Acaravci, S. K. 2015. The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from the Turkish manufacturing sector. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5 (1): 158-171.

Ahmed, H. J. A., and N. Hisham, 2009. Revisiting capital structure theory: A test of pecking order and static order trade-of model from Malaysian Capital Market. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 30: 58 – 65.

Almazan, A., and C. A. Molina. 2005. Intra-industry capital structure dispersion. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 14 (2): 263-297.

Bradley, M., G. Jarrell, and E. H. Kim. 1984. On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 39: 857-878.

Brennan, M., and E. Schwartz. 1978. Corporate income taxes, valuation, and the problem of optimal capital structure. Journal of Business 51 (1): 103-114.

Capozza, D. R., and P. J. Seguin. 1999. Leverage and value in apartment REITs. The National Multi Housing Council (the paper was accessed on 23 July 2011 at http://www.umich.edu/~reecon/restate/faculty/Capozza/Deb0899.pdf).

Frank, M. Z., and V. K. Goyal. 2004. The effect of market conditions on capital structure, adjustment. Financial Research Letter 1: 47-55.

Frank, M. Z., and V. K. Goyal. 2008. Trade off and pecking order theories of debt. In Eckbo, E. 2008, Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance 2 (Chapter 12).

Getzmann, A., L. Sebastian, and K. Spremann. 2010. Determinants of target capital structure and adjustment speed – Evidence from Asian Capital Markets. Asian Finance Symposium Paper.

Graham, J. R., and C. R. Harvey. 2001. The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics 60: 187-243.

Graham, J. R., and C. R. Harvey. 2002. How do CFOs make capital budgeting and capital structure decisions? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15 (1): 8 – 23.

Harris, M., and A. Raviv. 1991. The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance 46: 297- 355.

Hatfield, G. B., L. T. W. Cheng, and W. N. Davidson III. 1994. The Determination of optimal capital structure: The effect of firm and industry debt ratios on market value. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 7.

Jahan, N. O. 2014. Determinants of capital structure of listed textile enterprises in Bangladesh. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 5 (20): 11-20.

Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76: 323-329.

Kim, J-E. 2008. Strategic choice and financial structure in casual themed restaurants. Thesis, the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (accessed on July 23 2011 on http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10292008-202447/unrestricted/joungeun.pdf).

Kühnhausen, F., and H. W. Stieber. 2014. Determinants of capital structure in non-financial companies. Discussion Paper of Department of Economics, University of Munich (accessed 8 April 2015, available on online at http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21167/).

Leland, H. 1994. Corporate debt value, bond convenants, and optimal capital structure. Journal of Finance 49 (4): 1213-1252.

Lev, B. 1974. On the association between operating leverage and risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis: 627-641.

Mandelker, G. N., and S. G. Rhee. 1984. The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 19 (1): 45-57.

Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293–315

Mwangi, L. W., M. S. Makau, and G. Kosimbei. 2015. Relationship between capital structure and performance of non-financial companies listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics 1 (2): 72-90.

Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (3): 575-592.

Rafiq, M., A. Iqbal, and M. Atiq. 2008. The determinants of capital structure of the chemical industry in Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics 13 (1): 139-158.

Shanmugasundaram, G. 2008. Intra-industry variations of capital structure in pharmaceutical industry in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 16: 1450-2887.

Siegfried, J. J. 1984. Effective average U.S. corporation income tax rates. National Tax Journal 27: 245-259.

Vo, D. H., and V. T. Nguyen. 2014. Managerial ownership, leverage and dividend policies: Empirical evidence from Vietnam’s listed firms. International Journal of Economics and Finance 6: 274-284.

Welch, I. 2004. Capital structure and stock returns. Journal of Political Economy 112 (1).



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.6908

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1023 | views : 1510

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.