The Influence of CEOs’ Hubris on Firms’ Performance in Indonesia: The Moderating Effects of CEOs’ Power and Board Vigilance

Noni Ayu Rizka, T. Hani Handoko
(Submitted 4 April 2020)
(Published 5 October 2020)


Past studies on CEO hubris has found that board vigilance is effective in managing the negative outcome of hubris. Some studies found CEO non-duality and independent director representation are effective in decreasing the damage of hubris. However, these studies have only explored the causal relationship of hubris and firm performance in the one-tier corporate governance setting. This study analyzed the influence of CEO hubris on firm performance in Indonesia by taking into account the CEO-board power dynamics. Indonesia adopts the two-tier corporate system where the board is divided into the board of directors and commissioners. Through 99 public listed companies, this study found that hubris in Indonesian CEOs contributes well to firm performance. Moreover, a bigger commissioner board is effective in strengthening the positive influence of hubris on firm performance in Indonesia. Furthermore, this study hints that two-tier corporate governance is more efficient in controlling hubris than the one-tier system.


CEO hubris; firm performance; CEO power; board vigilance; corporate governance

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.55239


Ali, M. (2018). Determinants and consequences of board size: conditional indirect effects. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(1), 165–184.

Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2010). Measuring and Assessing Tone at the Top Using Annual Report CEO Letters.

Asad, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). Differentiating leader hubris and narcissism on the basis of power. Leadership, 16(1), 39–61.

Bureau Van Dijk. (2017). Global M & A Review 2017. 1–74.

Carter, S. M., & Greer, C. R. (2013). Strategic leadership: Values, styles, and organizational performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 20(4), 375–393.

Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386.

Claxton, G., Owen, D., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition? Leadership, 11(1), 57–78.

Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Perryman, A. A., & Donahue, M. S. (2007). The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1299–1323.

Cormier, D., Lapointe-Antunes, P., & Magnan, M. (2016). CEO power and CEO hubris: a prelude to financial misreporting? Management Decision, 54(2), 522–554.

Darmadi, S. (2013). Board members’ education and firm performance: evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(2), 113–135.

Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The Effects of CEO Founder Status and Stock Ownership on Entrepreneurial Orientation in Small Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32–55.

Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269–4277.

El-Khatib, R., Fogel, K., & Jandik, T. (2015). CEO network centrality and merger performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 349–382.

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

Haynes, K. T., Campbell, J. T., & Hitt, M. A. (2017). When More Is Not Enough: Executive Greed and Its Influence on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Management, 43(2), 555–584.

Haynes, K. T., Zattoni, A., Boyd, B. K., & Minichilli, A. (2019). Figureheads or potentates? CEO power and board oversight in the context of Sarbanes Oxley. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 27(6), 402–426.

Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.

Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297–319.

Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators? Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.

Huson, M. R., Malatesta, P. H., & Parrino, R. (2004). Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 237–275.

International Financial Law Review. (2018). M&A Report 2018. In Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.

Investment. (2017). Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As) on the Rise in Indonesia.

Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2018). Organizational Behavior: A Practical, Problem-Solving Approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Koo, H., & Park, C. (2018). Foundation of leadership in Asia: Leader characteristics and leadership styles review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 697–718.

Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68.

Lu, X., & White, H. (2014). Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics. Journal of Econometrics, 178(PART 1), 194–206.

Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649–659.

McClelland, P. L., Barker, V. L., & Oh, W. Y. (2012). CEO career horizon and tenure: Future performance implications under different contingencies. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1387–1393.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2014). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 34/POJK.04/2014 Tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 1–29. PERIZINAN FINAL F.pdf

Park, H., & Yoo, Y. (2017). The Theory Of Chief Executive Officer. 33(4), 703–718.

Park, J. H., Kim, C., Chang, Y. K., Lee, D. H., & Sung, Y. D. (2018). CEO Hubris and Firm Performance: Exploring the Moderating Roles of CEO Power and Board Vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 919–933.

Petit, V., & Bollaert, H. (2012). Flying Too Close to the Sun? Hubris Among CEOs and How to Prevent it. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 265–283.

Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1369–1386.

PT Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2018). Indeks.

Ramdani, D., & Witteloostuijn, A. van. (2010). The impact of board independence and CEO duality on firm performance: A quantile regression analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 607–627.

Roll, R. (1986). The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers. The Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.

Sadler-Smith, E., Akstinaite, V., Robinson, G., & Wray, T. (2017). Hubristic leadership: A review. Leadership, 13(5), 525–548.

Sewpersadh, N. S. (2019). An examination of CEO power with board vigilance as a catalyst for firm growth in South Africa. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(4), 377–395.

Suhoyo, Y., Van Hell, E. A., Prihatiningsih, T. S., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2014). Exploring cultural differences in feedback processes and perceived instructiveness during clerkships: Replicating a Dutch study in Indonesia. Medical Teacher, 36(3), 223–229.

Tang, Y., Li, J., & Yang, H. (2015). What I See, What I Do: How Executive Hubris Affects Firm Innovation. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1698–1723.

Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2018). Independence, size and performance of the board: An emerging market research. Corporate Ownership and Control, 15(2), 201–208.

Wang, G., Holmes, R. M., Oh, I. S., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs Matter to Firm Strategic Actions and Firm Performance? A Meta-Analytic Investigation Based on Upper Echelons Theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775–862.

World Bank. (2014). The Indonesia Corporate Governance Manual. In The Indonesia Corporate Governance Manual.

Zeitoun, H., Nordberg, D., & Homberg, F. (2019). The dark and bright sides of hubris: Conceptual implications for leadership and governance research. Leadership, 15(6), 647–672.

Zhang, L., Ren, S., Chen, X., Li, D., & Yin, D. (2020). CEO Hubris and Firm Pollution: State and Market Contingencies in a Transitional Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 459–478.

Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Ortas, E. (2020). The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta-analytic approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1361–1374.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.