Fraud Firms and the Matching Principle: Evidence from Korea

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5462

Jooyeon Hong(1*), Wonsun gamaijb@gmail.com Paek(2)

(1) School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea
(2) School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper examines whether the degree of matching for poor-performing fraud firms varies depending on the strength of the causal relation between expenses and revenues. A stronger causal relation exists between revenues and operating expenses than between revenues and total expenses that include non-operating expenses as well as operating expenses. Fraud firms have stronger incentives for managing earnings. Given that managing earnings is easier when using non-operating items than when using operating items, the degree of matching is (not) lower for fraud firms than for non-fraud firms at the strong (weak) level of the causal relation between revenues and expenses. Empirical results suggest that the degrees of matching are different between fraud and non-fraud firms only at the strong level of the causal relation between revenues and expenses. This result implies that the investigation of the matching model at a strong level of the causal relation between revenues and expenses is more effective than that at a weak level of the causal relation, with regard to examining the degree of matching for fraud firms. This study contributes to the literature by providing evidence on the importance of the level of the causal relation when examining the degree of matching.     

Full Text:

PDF


References

Albrecht, W. S., C. C. Albrecht, C. O. Albrecht, and M. F. Zimbelman. 2008. Fraud Examination. Mason, Ohio: Thompson-Southwestern.

Altman, E. I. 1968. Financial ratio, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance 23 (4): 589-609.

Beneish, M. D. 1999. The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal 55(5): 24-36.

Brazel, J. F., K. L. Jones, and M. F. Zimbelman. 2009. Using nonfinancial measures to assess fraud risk. Journal of Accounting Research 47(5): 1135-1166.

Collins, D., E. Maydew, and I. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 39-67.

Choi, K. and K. Choe. 2003. An analysis of the corporate characteristics of companies reporting aggressive accounting. Korean Accounting Review 28(2): 211-245.

Choi, K. and W. Paek. 1998. Empirical study about the earning manipulation of enforcement firms. Korean Accounting Review 23(2): 133-161.

Dichev, I. and V. Tang. 2008. Matching and the changing properties of accounting earnings over the last 40 years. The Accounting Review 83(6): 1425-1460.

Donelson, D., R. Jennings, and J. McInnis. 2011. Changes over time in the revenue-expense relation: Accounting or economics? The Accounting Review 86(3): 945-974.

Elliott, J., and D. Hanna. 1996. Repeated accounting write-offs and the information content of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 34(Supplement): 135-155.

Francis, J. and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37(2): 319-352.

Fan, Y., A. Barua, W. Cready, and W. Thomas. 2010. Managing earnings using classification shifting: Evidence from quarterly special item. The Accounting Review 85 (4): 1303-1323.

Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 125-153

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2001. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements.

Kirkos, Efstathios, C. Spathis, and Y. Manolopoulos. 2007. Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements. Expert Systems with Applications 32: 995-1003.

Marquardt, C. A., and C. I. Wiedman. 2004. How are earnings managed? An examination of specific accruals. Contemporary Accounting Research 21: 461-489.

McVay, S. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core and special items. The Accounting Review 81: 501-531.

Paek, W. 2011a. The change in accounting environment and the matching principle. Korean Management Review 40(1): 29-49.

Paek, W. 2011b. The matching principle and earnings quality. Korean Accounting Review 36(2): 101-127.

Paek, W., and S. Park. 2013. Firm life-cycle stages, revenue-expense matching, and the differential patterns of expense recognition. Korean Accounting Review 38(2): 215-245.

Park, S., and W. Paek. 2013. The effects of matching principle on incremental value relevance and relative pricing multiples between accounting information. Korean Accounting Review 38(1): 173-208.

Persons, O. S. 1995. Using financial statement data to identify factors associated with fraudulent factors associated with fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Applied Business Research 11(3): 38-46.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5462

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 927 | views : 924

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c)