The Imperfection in a Firm’s Knowledge of the Transformation Process Among Interlinked Internal Networks: The Defect Case

Cris Kuntadi, Prasetyo Boeditjahjono Boeditjahjono, Yuli Permatasari, Meylia Candrawati
(Submitted 31 January 2019)
(Published 30 May 2020)

Abstract


This study, firstly, identifies and analyzes the supply chain management of Aseli Dagadu Djokdja, Co., Ltd., (here-after ADD) which has a problem. Secondly, this study pinpoints what causes the problem in ADD’s supply-chain management (SCM). Thirdly, it investigates ADD’s knowledge of the transformation process, since it was not conducted properly. This research chose to use an exploratory case study with an in-depth interview to collect the data. This article questions all the CEOs and observes all stages of activity accompanied by their information, resources, and financial flows. The interviewer applies angulations to two or more of the subjects. This study takes note that ADD’s knowledge of the transformation process  is imperfect; this weakness is at the top managerial level. The problem is also found when oral explanations do not follow the transfer of documents among the divisions and staff. It means that information asymmetry takes place. This study, which is designed with SNT and a comprehensive knowledge of the transformation process, has several biases. The first one is the inference validity bias. Secondly, it did not investigate how ADD’s management faces industrial competitiveness. Finally, this research could not capture what the staff at ADD transforms their knowledge into.


Keywords


knowledge, transformation process, diffusion, innovation, social networks

References


Al-Haddad, A.-H.A.B. (1994). Alawi, risalah adab suluk al-murid: Yaman: Dar Al-Hawi.

Andres, M.D., Pablo, Q.J., & Pablo, F. (2016). Assessing collaboration networks in educational research: A co-authorship-based social network analysis approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(3), 416-436. doi: doi:10.1108/IJEM-11-2014-0154

Beatriz, L.d.S.J.A., Alceu, G.A.F., Adriana, B.N.V., & Charbel, J.C.J. (2011). Measuring supply chain management practices. Measuring Business Excellence, 15(2), 18-31. doi: doi:10.1108/13683041111131592

Bloodgood, J.M. (2019). Knowledge acquisition and firm competitiveness: The role of complements and knowledge source. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0430

Carol, X.O., Choon, L.S., & Chun, K.H. (2013). Computer‐mediated communication and social networking tools at work. Information Technology & People, 26(2), 172-190. doi: doi:10.1108/ITP-04-2013-0067

Cheng, H.-H. (2017). The antecedents of creative article diffusion on blogs. Online Information Review, 41(1), 70-84.

Colbry, S., Hurwitz, M., & Adair, R. (2014). Collaboration theory. Journal of Leadership Education. doi: DOI: 10.12806/V13/I4/C8

Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P.S. (2011). Business research methods: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.

Fawcett, S.E., Cynthia, W., Chard, A., Fawcett, A.M., & Magnan, G.M. (2011). Information technology as an enabler of supply chain collaboration: A dynamic- capabilities perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 38-59. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03213.x

Ganesh, M., Raghunathan, S., & Rajendran, C. (2014). The value of information sharing in a multi-product, multi-level supply chain: Impact of product substitution, demand correlation, and partial information sharing. Decis. Support Syst., 58, 79-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.012

Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers: SAGE Publications.

Gubbins, C., & Dooley, L. (2013). Exploring social network dynamics driving knowledge management for innovation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(2), 162-185. doi: 10.1177/1056492613499203

Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (1986). Resource sharing among sbus: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 695-714. doi: 10.2307/255940

Hague, P.N., & Jackson, P. (1987). Do your own market research: Kogan Page.

Henneberg, S.C., Juani, S., Peter, N., Zhizhong, J., & Stefanos, M. (2009). Mobilizing ideas in knowledge networks: A social network analysis of the human resource management community 1990‐2005. The Learning Organization, 16(6), 443-459. doi: doi:10.1108/09696470910993927

Hosmer, L.T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of management Review, 20(2), 379-403.

Josep, C.V., Josefa, M., & Jordi, C. (2011). A social network‐based organizational model for improving knowledge management in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 284-293. doi: doi:10.1108/13598541111139099

Kirsch, L.J. (1996). The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.1.1

Kirsch, L.J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M.H. (2010). Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21(2), 469-489.

Kwon, I.-W.G., Kim, S.-H., & Martin, D.G. (2016). Healthcare supply chain management; strategic areas for quality and financial improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 422-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.014

Lee, H.L., & Whang, S. (2000). Information sharing in a supply chain. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 1(1), 79-93. doi: 10.1504/ijmtm.2000.001329

Levallet, N., & Chan, Y.E. (2019). Organizational knowledge retention and knowledge loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 176-199. doi: 10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0358

Mitchell, J.C. (1974). Social networks. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3(1), 279-299. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.001431

Modi, S.B., Wiles, M.A., & Mishra, S. (2015). Shareholder value implications of service failures in triads: The case of customer information security breaches. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 21-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.003

Nadia, Z., & Peter, T. (2017). An information sharing theory perspective on willingness to share information in supply chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 417-443. doi: doi:10.1108/IJLM-09-2015-0158

Normadhi, N.B.A., Shuib, L., Nasir, H.N.M., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168-190.

Ouchi, W.G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 95-113. doi: 10.2307/2391748

Ouchi, W.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833.

Pavitra, M., Rajen, G., & Jyotsna, B. (2014). Grounded theory research: Exploring work-family enrichment in an emerging economy. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(3), 289-306. doi: doi:10.1108/QRJ-01-2013-0001

Rogers, C.R. (1986). The rust workshop: A personal overview. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 26(3), 23-45. doi: 10.1177/0022167886263003

Rötzmeier-Keuper, J., Jennifer, H., Wünderlich, N.V., & Schmitz, G. (2018). Triadic relationships in the context of services for animal companions. Journal of Business Research, 85(C), 295-303.

Satu, N., Pia, H.-L., & Wesley, J.J. (2014). Absorptive capacity and network orchestration in innovation communities – promoting service innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(2), 173-184. doi: doi:10.1108/JBIM-08-2013-0167

Shadur, M.A., & Bamber, G.J. (1994). Toward lean management? International transferability of japanese management strategies to australia. The International Executive, 36(3), 343-364. doi: doi:10.1002/tie.5060360307

Shakerian, H., Dehnavi, H.D., & Shateri, F. (2016). A framework for the implementation of knowledge management in supply chain management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 176-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.022

Sih, A., Hanser, S.F., & McHugh, K.A. (2009). Social network theory: New insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(7), 975-988. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0725-6

Singleton, R. (1988). Approaches to social research: Oxford University Press.

Strauss, A., Corbin, J.M., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory: SAGE Publications.

Turban, E., Bolloju, N., & Liang, T.-P. (2010). Social commerce: An e-commerce perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: Roadmap for the Future of Electronic Business, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wieland, A., Handfield, R.B., & Durach, C.F. (2016). Mapping the landscape of future research themes in supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 37(3), 205-212. doi: 10.1111/jbl.12131

Wynstra, F., Spring, M., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Service triads: A research agenda for buyer–supplier–customer triads in business services. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 1-20.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods: SAGE Publications.

"Times New Roman",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Arial;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;

mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>

field-end'>


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.43222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.