Workplace Fairness, Information Sharing and Employee Performance in a Budget Setting: An Empirical Study

Suria Zainuddin, Che Ruhana Isa
(Submitted 10 December 2017)
(Published 26 August 2019)

Abstract


The importance that workplace fairness and information sharing has on employees’ performance has gained a significant attention from researchers and practitioners. However, no empirical evidence on the combined role of both workplace fairness and information sharing on employee performance has been found so far. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of workplace fairness and information sharing on employees’ performance in a budget setting. A set of direct and indirect hypotheses are tested using survey data collected from 108 sub-unit managers from various industries, randomly selected from Bursa Malaysia (the stock exchange of Malaysia). The findings indicate that both workplace fairness and information sharing are positively associated with improved employee performance in a participative budget setting. Furthermore, information sharing mediates the relationship between workplace fairness and employee performance. This suggests that when employees perceive the budgeting process as being fair, they would be more willing to share information, which will then lead to improved employee performance.


Keywords


Workplace fairness; Distributive fairness, Procedural fairness; Information sharing; Budget participation; Performance

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.31133

References


Adams, J. S. 1966. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2 (C): 267–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2.

Alexander, S., and M. Ruderman. 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1 (2): 177–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015.

Brownell, P. 1982. A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control. The Accounting Review 57 (4): 766–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247411%5Cnhttp://about.jstor.org/terms.

Brownell, P. 1985. Budgetary systems and the control of functionally differentiated organizational activities. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (2): 502–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490823.

Brownell, P., and M. Hirst. 1986. Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation, and task uncertainty: Tests of a three-way interaction. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (2): 241–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491132.

Brownell, P., and M. McInnes. 1986. Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. Accounting Review 61 (4): 587. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Bryan, J. F. and Locke, E. A. (1967). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 53 (3): 274-277.

Byrne, S., and F. Damon. 2008. To participate or not to participate? Voice and explanation effects on performance in a multi-period budget xetting. British Accounting Review 40 (3):207–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.04.001.

Chalos, P., and M. C. C. Poon. 2000. Participation and performance in capital budgeting teams. Behavioral Research in Accounting 12 (2): 199.

Chin, W. W. 1998. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research. In Modern Methods for Business Research: Methodology for Business and Management: 295–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.010.

Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organisational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (33): 386-400.

Conlon, D. E. 1993. Some tests of the self-interest and group-value models of procedural justice/ : Evidence from an organizational appeal procedure. Academy of Management Journal 36 (5): 1109–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/256648.

Cropanzano, R., D. E Bowen, and S. W. Gilliland. 2007. The Management of Organizational Justice. The Academy of Management Perspectives: 34–48.

Dunk, A. S. 1989. Budget emphasis, budgetary participation and managerial performance: A note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 (4): 321–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(89)90002-0.

Fisher, J., J. R. Frederickson, and Sean A. Peffer. 2002. The Effect of Information Asymmetry on Negotiated Budgets: An Empirical Investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (1–2):27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00046-0.

Folger, R., and M. A. Konovsky. 1989. Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions To Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32 (1):115–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/256422.

Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (4): 39–50.

Frucot, V., and W. T. Shearon. 1991. Budgetary participation, locus of control, and mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. Accounting Review 66 (1): 80.

Fuller, C. M., M. J. Simmering, G. Atinc, Y. Atinc, and B. J. Babin. 2016. Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research 69 (8): 3192-3198.

Gilliland, S. W. 1993. The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. The Academy of Management Review 18 (4): 694–734. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258595.

Govindarajan, V. 1986. Impact of participation in the budgetary process on managerial attitudes and performance: Universalistic and contingency perspectives. Decision Sciences 17 (4): 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00240.x.

Greenberg, J. 1993. The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organisational justice. Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management 4: 79–103.

Greenberg, P. S., R. H. Greenberg, and H. Nouri. 1994. Participative Budgeting: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Methodological Moderators. Journal of Accounting Literature 13: 117.

Gul, F. A., and Y. M. Chia. 1994. The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (4–5): 413–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90005-1.

Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics. 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20 (2009): 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(92)90003-4.

Hopwood, A. 1976. Accounting and Human Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoque, Z.. 2006. Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories and Methods. Edited by Zahirul Hoque. London: Spiramus Press Ltd. 2006.

Hoque, Z., and P. Brosnan. 2012. Industrial relations, budgetary participation and budget use: An empirical study. In , 119–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000021011.

Hsu, S. H., W. H. Chen, and M. J. Hsieh. 2006. Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500451465.

Hulland, J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 20 (2):195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.3.CO;2-Z.

Kenis, I. 1979. Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review 54 (4): 707-721.

Latham, G. P. and E. A. Locke. 1979. Goal setting – a motivational technique that works. Organisational Dynamics: 68-80.

Lau, C. M., and M. Sholihin. 2005. Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction? British Accounting Review 37 (4): 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.06.002.

Lau, C. M., and S. L. C. Tan. 2006. The effects of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust on job tension in budgeting. Management Accounting Research 17 (2): 171–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.10.001.

Lau, C. M., K. M. Wong, and I. R. C. Eggleton. 2008. Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: The role of outcome based and non outcome based effects. Accounting and Business Research 38 (January): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325.

Lau, C. M, and E. W. Lim. 2002. The intervening effects of participation on the relationship between procedural justice and managerial performance. British Accounting Review 34 (1): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2001.0184.

Lau, C. M., and B. Oger. 2012. Behavioral effects of fairness in performance measurement and evaluation systems: Empirical evidence from France. Advances In Accounting 28 (2): 323-332.

Leventhal, G. S. 1980.What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research: 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2.

Libby, T. 1999. The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative budgeting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (2): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00043-9.

Lindquist, T. M. 1995. Fairness as an antecedent to participative budgeting: Examining the effects of distributive justice, procedural justice and referent cognitions on satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7 (1990): 122–47.

Locke, E. A. and J. F. Bryan. 1968. Goal-setting as a determinant of the effect of knowledge of score on performance. The American Journal of Psychology 81 (3): 398-406.

Locke, E. A. and G. P. Latham. 1984. Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique that Works!, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Locke, E. A., G. P. Latham, and M. Erez. 1988. The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review 13 (1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1988.4306771.

Locke, E. A., and D. Schweiger. 1979. Participation in decision making: One more look. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organisational Behaviour 1: 265-339, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Magner, N., and G. G. Johnson. 1995. Municipal officials’ reactions to justice in budgetary resource allocation. Public Administration Quarterly 18 (4): 439–56.

Magner, N., R. B. Welker, and T. L. Campbell. 1995. The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (7–8): 611–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00006-U.

Mahoney, T. A, T. H. Jerdee, and S. J. Carroll. 1965. The job(s) of management. Industrial Relations 4 (2): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1965.tb00922.x.

Maiga, A. S, and F. A. Jacobs. 2007. Budget participation’s influence on budget slack: The role of fairness perceptions, trust and goal commitment. Jamar 5 (1): 39–58.

Mia, L. 1989. The impact of participation in budgeting and job difficulty on managerial performance and work motivation: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 (4): 347–57.https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(89)90005-6.

Milani, K. 1975. The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. Accounting Review 50 (2): 274. https://doi.org/10.2307/244709.

Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviours: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (6): 845-855.

Nouri, H., and R. J. Parker. 1998. The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (5–6): 467–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00036-6.

O’Connor, N. G. 1995. The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (5): 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)00034-S.

Parker, R. J., and L. Kyj. 2006.Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (1): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.005.

Podsakoff, P. M., and D. W. Organ. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4): 531-544.

Shields, J. F., and M. D. Shields. 1998. Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (1): 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00014-7.

Shields, M. D, and S. M. Young. 1993. Antecedents and consequences of participative budgeting: Evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information. Journal of Management Accounting Research 5: 265–80.

Sholihin, M., R. Pike, M. Mangena, and J. Li. 2011. Goal-setting participation and goal commitment: Examining the mediating roles of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust in a UK financial services organisation. British Accounting Review 43 (2): 135–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.02.003.

Skarlicki, D. P., and R. Folger. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (3): 434-443.

Tang, T. L-P., and L. J. Sarfield-Baldwin. 1996. Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075) 61 (3): 25.

Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,

Tosi, H. L., E. A. Locke, and G. P. Latham. 1991. A theory of goal setting and task performance. The Academy of Management Review 16 (2): 480. https://doi.org/10.2307/258875.

Vincent, K., and K. M. Chong. 2002. Budget goal commitment and informational effects of budget participation on performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Behavioral research in accounting. 14 (1) (Februari): 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.65

Wentzel, K. 2002. The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers’ performance in a budget Setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 14 (1):247–71. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.247.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.