Beban ekonomi yang ditanggung pasien dan keluarga akibat penyakit stroke: studi literatur
Honesty Fadhilah(1*), Vetty Yulianty Permanasari(2)
(1) Departemen Administrasi dan Kebijakan Kesehatan, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia
(2) Departemen Administrasi dan Kebijakan Kesehatan, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Economic burden borne by patients and families due to stroke: literatur review
Purpose: Stroke to this day is still a disease that carries a high disability, so that in the future it requires very expensive costs, and has an impact on the socio-economic consequences for patients and their families. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the causes of costs that cause economic burden due to stroke.
Methods: The method used is content analysis by searching literature review from various sources, both in the form of journals and textbooks from national and international levels.
Results: The literature study shows that direct medical costs in the form of rehabilitation costs and nursing care were identified as the main contributors that caused a high economic burden due to stroke.
Conclusions: The high cost incurred causes families to experience catastrophic financial disasters, resulting in a decrease in the level of welfare. Social preventive measures are needed to reduce the magnitude of the prevalence of stroke to be able to reduce this cost burden in order to protect every household from the financial threat of a stroke.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
2. American Heart Association. Stroke Fact Sheet. 2016;
4. Kusuima Y, Venketasubramanian N, Kiemas LS, Misbach J. Burden of Stroke in Indonesia [Internet]. International Journal of Stroke. 2009. pp. 379–380. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00326.x
5. Kemenkes RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2013. 2013.
6. Kemenkes RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2018. 2018.
8. Icagasioglu et al. Economic burden of stroke. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2017. 2017;
12. Hankey GJ. The global and regional burden of stroke [Internet]. The Lancet Global Health. 2013. pp. e239–e240. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70095-0
13. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Chugh S, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 [Internet]. The Lancet Neurology. 2016. pp. 913–924. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30073-4
15. Carlo AD, Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke [Internet]. Age and Ageing. 2008. pp. 4–5. doi:10.1093/ageing/afn282
17. Kim AS, Claiborne Johnston S. Global Variation in the Relative Burden of Stroke and Ischemic Heart Disease [Internet]. Circulation. 2011. pp. 314–323. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.018820
18. Mukherjee D, Patil CG. Epidemiology and the Global Burden of Stroke [Internet]. World Neurosurgery. 2011. pp. S85–S90. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.023
21. Pritchard C, Sculpher MJ. Productivity Costs: Principles and Practice in Economic Evaluation. 2000.
23. Gbiri CA, Olawale OA, Isaac SO. Stroke management: Informal caregivers’ burdens and strians of caring for stroke survivors [Internet]. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015. pp. 98–103. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.46382
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1588 | views : 4399Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).