Karakter enumerator yang diinginkan responden untuk penelitian yang bersifat longitudinal: kasus health demographic surveillance system Sleman

https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.29338

Wahyuni Harahap(1*), Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi(2)

(1) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan dan Kedokteran Sosial, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan dan Kedokteran Sosial, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Respondent preferred enumerator characteristics for longitudinal study:  the case of Sleman health demographic surveillance system

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore the enumerator characteristics preferred by respondent for longitudinal study in the case of Sleman Health Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS Sleman).

Methods

A case study was conducted using primary and secondary data. Secondary data was in the form of transcript of research interview "Design of Reward System for HDSS Sleman Research Respondent", from respondents attrition sample category on the data collection cycle II. Equipped with primary data in the form of observation when taking HDSS data Sleman cycle III.

Results

Research respondents preferred an enumerator who conveyed the research identity, including explanation of research objectives, research procedures and benefits, and agency of the enumerator. The clarity of research objectives is the main respondents reason to stay motivated to participate in research Sleman HDSS.

Conclusion

Sleman HDSS respondents preferred enumerators who communicate the research identity in the form of research objectives, research procedures and benefits, as well as agencies, and enumerators.


Keywords


enumerator; character; case of Sleman HDSS; identity research



References

  1. FK, I., 2015. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada. [Online] Available at: http://fk.ugm.ac.id [Accessed 3 Januari 2017].
  2. Rajulton F. The fundamentals of longitudinal research: an overview. Canadian Studies in Population. 2001 Dec 31;28(2):169-85.
  3. Churchill & Gilbert, A., Basic marketing research, fourth edition. s.l.:Harcourt, Inc. 2005.
  4. Blom AG, Korbmacher JM. Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys: A conceptual framework. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF). 2013 Jan 23.
  5. Durrant GB, D'Arrigo J, Steele F. Analysing interviewer call record data by using a multilevel discrete time event history modelling approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2013 Jan 1;176(1):251-69.
  6. Widyarini, N., n.d. Membangun Hubungan Antar Manusia. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  7. Saldaña J. Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Rowman Altamira; 2003 May 16.
  8. Pickery J, Loosveldt G, Carton A. The effects of interviewer and respondent characteristics on response behavior in panel surveys: A multilevel approach. Sociological Methods & Research. 2001 May;29(4):509-23.
  9. Durrant GB, Groves RM, Staetsky L, Steele F. Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors on refusal in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010 Jan 1;74(1):1-36.
  10. Locke EA, Latham GP. A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1990.
  11. Embi MA. Sistem saraan di Malaysia: sistem saraan berasaskan merit. Utusan Publications; 2005.
  12. Ivancevich John M, Konopaske R, Matteson MT. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, jilid 1 edisi ke 7. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. 2007.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.29338

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 466 | views : 535

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).

Indexed by:


Web
Analytics Visitor Counter