Intensi fertilitas wanita usia subur dan kehamilan tidak diinginkan di Indonesia: analisis performance monitoring and accountability 2020

https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.17802

Supriyatna Supriyatna(1*), Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi(2), Siswanto Agus Wilopo(3)

(1) Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional (BKKBN)
(2) Department of Health Behavior, Environment Health, and Social Medicine Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Population Health Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Fertility intention of reproductive age women and unique unintended pregnancy in Indonesia: an analysis of performance monitoring and accountability 2020

Purpose: This research aimed to study the connection of fertility intention with unintended pregnancy of reproductive women in Indonesia. Methods: This cross-sectional study used performance monitoring and accountability data 2020 phase I of 2015. Subjects were 5,581 reproductive women of age 15-49, married, sexually active, ever pregnant and fecund. Analysis techniques used univariable (descriptive), bivariable (chi-square), while multilevel (general linear model) was used as last analysis technique for hierarchical data such as performance monitoring and accountability data. All tests used confidence interval (CI) 95% and significance rate p<0.05%. Results: Reproductive women with fertility intention who do not want any more children had 1.53 times greater probability to have unintended pregnancy, compared to those undecided about their fertility intention. The majority of low educated reproductive women in province level had risk probability to unintended pregnancy. However, the proportion of poor and poorest residents of province level had protective probability to unintended pregnancy. Relation variation between reproductive women’s fertility intention and unintended pregnancy in community level was statistically significant. Conclusion: Providers should target community groups to be given interventions on the prevention of unwanted pregnancies based on results of the target fertility intent analysis.

Abstrak
Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari hubungan intensi fertilitas dengan kehamilan ibu reproduktif yang tidak diinginkan di Indonesia. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian cross-sectional dengan menggunakan data PMA 2020 tahap I tahun 2015. Subjek penelitian adalah 5.581 wanita usia subur usia 15-49 tahun, menikah, aktif secara seksual, hamil dan berkepanjangan. Teknik analisis yang digunakan univariable (deskriptif), bivariabel (chi-square), sedangkan multilevel (model linier umum) digunakan sebagai teknik analisis terakhir untuk data hirarkis seperti data PMA. Semua tes menggunakan confidence interval (CI) 95% dan tingkat signifikansi p<0,05. Hasil: Analisis multilevel menunjukkan bahwa wanita reproduktif dengan intensi fertilitas yang tidak menginginkan anak lagi berisiko 1,53 kali lebih besar mengalami kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan dibandingkan dengan mereka yang belum memutuskan tentang niat kesuburan. Mayoritas wanita usia subur yang berpendidikan rendah di tingkat provinsi memiliki probabilitas risiko untuk kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan (OR = 1,07; 95% CI: 1,04-1,09). Namun, proporsi penduduk miskin dan termiskin di tingkat provinsi memiliki probabilitas protektif untuk kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan (OR = 0,96; 95% CI: 0,95-0,98). Variasi hubungan antara niat kesuburan wanita reproduksi dan kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan di tingkat komunitas adalah signifikan secara statistik. Simpulan: Provider sebaiknya menargetkan kelompok masyarakat yang akan diberikan intervensi terhadap pencegahan kehamilan tidak diinginkan berdasarkan hasil analisis intensi fertilitas.


Keywords


fertility intention; unintended



References

  1. Sedgh, G., Singh, S. & Rubina, H. Unintended Pregnancy: Worldwide Levels,Trends, and Outcomes. Studies in Family Planning. 2010: 41241-250.
  2. Sedgh, G., Singh, S. & Hussain, R. Intended and Unintended Pregnancies Worldwide in 2012 and Recent Trends. Studies in Family Planning. 2014; 45(3): 301-314.
  3. BPS. Survey Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2013. Calverton Maryland, USA: BPS and Macro International; 2013
  4. Sativa, L. R. PKBI: 11-30 Persen Kematian Ibu Terjadi Akibat Aborsi Tidak Aman; 2015. Available at http://health.detik.com;
  5. PMA2020. PMA 2015/indonesia-R1 performance monitoring & accountability 2020; 2015. Available at http://www.pma2020.org
  6. Finer, L. B. & Zolna, M. R. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities. Contraception, 84(5): 475-485; Klima, C. S. (1998) Unintended pregnancy. Consequences and solutions for a worldwide problem. Journal Nurse Midwifery. 2011; 43(6): 483-91.
  7. Goicolea, I. & Sebastian, M. S. Unintended pregnancy in the Amazon Basin of Ecuador: a multilevel analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2010; 9(14): 1-11.
  8. Easterlin, R. A., Wongboonsin, K. & Ahmed, M. A. The Demand for Family Planning: A New Approach. Studies in Family Planning. 1998; 19(5): 257-269.
  9. Casterline, J. B., El-Zanatay, F. & El-Zeini, L. O. Unmet need and unintended fertility: longitudinal evidence from upper Egypt. International Family Planning Perspective. 2003; 29(4): 158-66.
  10. Ajzen, I. & Klobas, J. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research. 2013; 29(8): 204-232.
  11. Miller, W. B. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. 2011: 975-98.
  12. Speizer, I. S. & Lance, P. Fertility desires, family planning use and pregnancy experience: longitudinal examination of urban areas in three African countries. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015; 15294.
  13. Tsui, A. O., McDonald-Mosley, R. & Burke, A. E. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2010: 32152-74.
  14. Ikamari, L., Izugbara, C. & Ochako, R. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy among women in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Pregnancy and childbirth. 2013; 13(69): 1-9.
  15. Bennett, I. M., Culhane, J. F., McCollum, K. F. & Elo, I. T. Unintended rapid repeat pregnancy and low education status: Any role for depression and contraceptive use? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006; 194(3): 749-754.
  16. Tanfer, K., Cubbins, L. A. & Brewster, K. L. Determinants of Contraceptive Choice Among Single Women in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives. 1992; 24(4): 155-173.
  17. Kumar, M., Jyoti, M., Aruna, P., Poddar, A., Dhariwal, V. & Shailendra, K. Unintended Pregnancy Among Low Income Urban Married Women in India. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 2012; 62(1): 52-56.
  18. Teshome, T. F., Hailu, A. G. & Teklehaymanot, A. N. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among married pregnant women in Ganji woreda, west Wollega Oromia region, Ethiopia Science Journal of Public Health. 2014; 2(2): 92-101.
  19. Curtis, S., Evens, E. & Sambisa, W. Contraceptive discontinuation and unintended pregnancy: an imperfect relationship. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2011; 37(2): 58-66.
  20. Jayne, S. H. & Guilkey, D. K. Contraceptive Determinants in Three Leading Countries. Population Research and Policy Review. 1998; 17(4): 329-350.
  21. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50(2): 179-211.
  22. Dibaba, Y. Factors Influencing Women's Intention to Limit Childbearing in Oromia, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2009; 23(1): 28-33.
  23. Tonlaar, Y. J. & Ayoola, A. B. Pregnancy Intention and Contraceptive Use Among Low Income Women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2014; 43(S1): S71-S71.
  24. Nasution, S. L. Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penggunaan MKJP di Enam Wilayah Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan KB dan Keluarga Sejahtera BKKBN. 2011: 1-73.
  25. Palamuleni & Adebowale. Prevalence and Determinants of Unintended Pregnancies in Malawi. African Population Studies. 2014; 28(1): 551-563.
  26. Mustikaningtyas. Rasional penggunaan metode kontrasepsi (Analisis Data Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2012) TESIS Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. 2015: 1-68.
  27. Withers, M. H., Tavrow, P. & Adinata, N. A. Do ambivalent women have an unmet need for family planning? A longitudinal study from Bali, Indonesia. Women Health Issues. 2011: 21.
  28. Collumbien, M., Gerressu, M. & Cleland, J. Non-use and use of ineffective methods of contraception. In: Ezzati, m., Lopez, A. D., Rodgers, A. & Murray, C. J. L. (eds.) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004
  29. Besculides, M. & Laraque, F. Unintended pregnancy among the urban poor. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2004; 81(3): 340-348.
  30. Font-Ribera, L., Pérez, G., Salvador, J. & Borrell, C. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion Decision. Journal of Urban Health. 2008; 85(1): 125-135.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.17802

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2917 | views : 1523

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2018 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).

Indexed by:

 

Web Analytics Visitor Counter