ESG Controversy as a Moderator of the Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Indicators on High-Profile Companies' Performance in Asia
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the relationship of each environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspect to the performance of high-profile companies, and the purpose of this study further analyzes the role of moderating ESG controversies on the relationship of every aspect of ESG disclosure to corporate performance. Application of research observation data, using observations from 2010 to 2019, is a company in an Asian country listed on the Sustainable Stock Exchange, which requires companies to publish and report ESG aspects. This study excludes the period 2020-2024 from the analysis because the global economic crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic has caused the company to change its priorities. The purposive sampling method was used in this study, obtaining 847 samples of observational data from seven countries in the Asian region. Regression moderation analysis was used to examine the relationship between each aspect of ESG and the performance of high-profile companies with the controversy of ESG as a moderation variable. The study results obtained findings that social and governance aspects have a positive and significant effect on the performance of high-profile companies. However, environmental aspects were found to be insignificant. The findings of the ESG controversy weaken the relationship between social and governance aspects of high-profile company performance, and the ESG controversy does not moderate the relationship of environmental disclosure to company performance.
References
Abdi, Y., Li, X., & Càmara-Turull, X. (2022). Exploring the impact of sustainability (ESG) disclosure on firm value and financial performance (FP) in airline industry: the moderating role of size and age. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 5052–5079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01649-w
Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
Becchetti, L., Cucinelli, D., Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2023). Corporate social irresponsibility: The relationship between ESG misconduct and the cost of equity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89(December 2022), 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102833
Capelli, P., Ielasi, F., & Russo, A. (2023). Integrating ESG risks into value-at-risk. Finance Research Letters, 55(PA), 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103875
Cauthorn, T., Dumrose, M., Eckert, J., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2023). Rating changes revisited: New evidence on short-term ESG momentum. Finance Research Letters, 54(January), 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103703
Cepni, O., Demirer, R., Pham, L., & Rognone, L. (2023). Climate uncertainty and information transmissions across the conventional and ESG assets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 83(June 2022), 101730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101730
Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2014). From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustainability Can Drive Financial Outperformance. In SSRN Electronic Journal (Issue March). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281
COSO and WBCSD. (2018). Applying Enterprise Risk Management to Environmental, Social and Governance-related Risks. WBCSD. https://www.coso.org/Documents/COSO-WBCSD-ESGERM-Guidance%0AFull.pdf.
DasGupta, R. (2022). Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters, Volume 46,. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
EPA. (2021). Global Emissions and Removals by Gas. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-overview
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
Henisz, W., Koller, T., & Nuttall, R. (2020). Five ways that ESG creates value. Mckinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/five-ways-that-esg-creates-value#/
Kell, G. (2018). The Remarkable Rise Of ESG. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgkell/2018/07/11/the-remarkable-rise-of-esg/? sh=67c5f2ab1695
Khoirudin, R., & Khasanah, U. (2018). Valuasi Ekonomi Objek Wisata Pantai Parangtritis, Bantul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 18(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.2018.09
Kumoro, M. P., & Ariesanti, A. (2017). Potensi Pajak Bumi Dan Bangungan Sektor Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan Kota Yogyakarta Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Kemandirian Daerah. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 2(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v2i1.3684
Kurniawan, M. L. A., & A’yun, I. Q. (2022). Dynamic Analysis On Export, FDI and Growth in Indonesia: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 24(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v24i3.2717
Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008.
Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007
López Prol, J., & Kim, K. (2022). Risk-return performance of optimized ESG equity portfolios in the NYSE. Finance Research Letters, 50(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103312
Lu, Z., & Li, H. (2023). Does environmental information disclosure affect green innovation? Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.07.011
Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166(December 2022), 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
Mansouri, S., & Momtaz, P. P. (2022). Financing sustainable entrepreneurship: ESG measurement, valuation, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(6), 106258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106258
Marsat, S., Pijourlet, G., & Ullah, M. (2022). Does environmental performance help firms to be more resilient against environmental controversies? International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 44(May 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102028
Marshall, A., Rao, S., Roy, P. P., & Thapa, C. (2022). Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences. Journal of Corporate Finance, 76(February 2021), 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102261
Melinda, A., & Wardhani, R. (2020). the Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance, and Controversies on Firms’ Value: Evidence From Asia. International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, 27, 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
Minggu, A. M., Aboladaka, J., & Neonufa, G. F. (2023). Environmental, Social dan Governance (ESG) dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. Owner, 7(2), 1186–1195. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1371
Mohammad, W. M. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2(September 2020), 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015
MSCI ESG Research. (2024). ESG Controversies and Global Norms - Methodology. June, 1–53.
Na, K., Lee, Y., & Yu, H. (2023). CEO Type and Earnings Management to Avoid Loss or Earnings Decreases: Evidence from South Korea. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 25(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.72880
Nasdaq News. (2021). ESG Continues to Gain Investable Momentum in Asia. Nasdaq. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/esg-continues-to-gain-investable-momentum-in-asia-2021-11-15?amp
Nasir, M. S., A.K., M. L., Andriyani, N., Wibowo, A. R., & Oktaviani, Y. (2022). Credit Guarantee the National Economic Recovery Program (PEN) for MSMEs: A Case Study of MSMEs for Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY. Ekuilibrium : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 17(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.24269/ekuilibrium.v17i2.2022.pp158-170
Nasir, M. S., Wibowo, A. R., & Yansyah, D. (2021). The Determinants of Economic Growth: Empirical Study of 10 Asia-Pacific Countries. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 10(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v10i1.18752
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162(June 2020), 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
OECD. (2020). ESG Investing: Environmental Pillar Scoring and Reporting,. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/0cc43524-en.
Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
PWC. (2020). Environmental, Social, and Governance Trends in Asia. Asia Pacific’s Time, 1–84.
Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
Qoyum, A., Sakti, M. R. P., Thaker, H. M. T., & AlHashfi, R. U. (2022). Does the islamic label indicate good environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance? Evidence from sharia-compliant firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.001
Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427
Rahman, M. N., & Rahman, N. (2022). Exploring digital trade provisions in Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in times of crisis: India and Asia-Pacific countries. Asia and the Global Economy, 2(2), 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2022.100036
Refinitiv Eikon Datastream. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores from Refinitiv. LSEG Data and Anlytics. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/sustainable-finance/esg-scores
Saleh, R., & Wulandari, N. (2024). The Actualization of The Economic Movement : An Approach to The Study of Economic Growth in Indonesia. Jurnal Simki Economic, 7(2), 390–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jse.v7i2.599
Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72(May 2020), 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
Sila, I., & Cek, K. (2017). The impact of environmental, social and governance dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Australian evidence. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.310
Tan, Y. M., Szulczyk, K., & Sii, Y. H. (2023). Performance of ESG-integrated smart beta strategies in Asia-Pacific stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 66(May 2023), 102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102008
Tanjaya, F., & Ratmono, D. (2024). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Dan Governance (Esg) Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Variabel Moderasi Board Size. Diponegoro Journal of Acccounting, 13(3), 1–13.
Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Shareholder litigation rights and ESG controversies: A quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84(February), 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102396
UNPRI. (2021). What are the Principles for Responsible Investment? PRI Assocation. https://www.unpri.org/about-us/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment
Usman, B., Bernardes, O. T. F., & Kananlua, P. S. (2020). On the nexus between csr practices, esg performance, and asymmetric information. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(2), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.54053
Wulandari, N., & Saleh, R. (2024). Analysis of CSR Disclosure Practice in Sustainability Reports: A Case Study of Mining and Agriculture Companies in the Indonesia Sharia Stock Index. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari Dan Manajemen, 8(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v8i2.22818
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Yawika, M. K., & Handayani, S. (2019). The Effect of ESG Performance on Economic Performance in the High Profile Industry in Indonesia. Journal of International Business and Economics, 7(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.15640/jibe.v7n2a12
Yuniarti, D., & Sukarniati, L. (2021). Penuaan Petani dan Determinan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja di Sektor Pertanian. Agriekonomika, 10(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v10i1.9789
Zahid, R. M. A., Khan, M. K., Anwar, W., & Maqsood, U. S. (2022). The role of audit quality in the ESG-corporate financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Western European companies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S200–S212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.08.011
Copyright (c) 2025 Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business by Master of Business Administration, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
