KETIDAKBERDAYAAN PEMILIK SAWAH DAN KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP MEREKA: Kasus Penanaman Tembakau di Klaten

https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.11834

Faturochman Faturochman(1*), Bimo Walgito(2)

(1) Gadjah Mada University
(2) Gadjah Mada University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Owners of rice fields in this research express their powerlessness/helplessness when their property is used by another party. This is so because right from the very beginning the government has been treating them unfairly. Such injustice/unfairness is manifested in the procedure, distribution, and the relationship between rice field owners and the government, especially PTPN. From the perspective of procedure, injustice arises from denying rice field owners the opportunity to become actively involved in the cooperation arrangement with the user of their fields (PTPN). From the perspective of distribution, the income of when the rice fields are operated by PTPN is generally lower than that obtained when the field owners operate them. From the vantage point of relationship, the feeling of injustice arises from the existence of a large social gap between the two parties. This research has emphasized on the farmers’ point of view. Nonetheless, results from other studies conducted in the same area, whether on the underlying public policy or history, came up with similar conclusions.


Keywords


populasi, psikologi, pedesaan, petani, tembakau, klaten

Full Text:

PDF


References

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2000. Keadaan Angkatan Kerja di Indonesia. Jakarta.

Faturochman. 1998. “Bertahan hidup di masa krisis”, Seminar Social Security and Social Policy, Yogyakarta, 28-29 Desember. Diselenggarakan oleh Pusat Penelitian Kependudukan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Fauzi, N. (ed.) 1997. Tanah dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

———————. 1999. Petani dan Penguasa: Dinamika Perjalanan Politik Agraria Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

Kompas. 2000. “Jika mutu terjamin pasar tembakau BNO masih terbuka” 11 September, hlm. 44.

———————. 2000. “Mengkaji corporate farmingdengan kepala dingin” 14 Agustus, hlm. 39.

———————. 2000. “Nasib petani tembakau BNO tidak seharum asap cerutu” 11 September, hlm. 34.

———————. 2000. “Wacana yang perlu dikaji secara komprehensif dan jujur” 14 Agustus, hlm 40.

———————. 2001. “Jangan biarkan petani “mogok” 19 Januari, hlm. 15.

Madenar. 1999. “Melongok ke belakang menatap masa depan: pengalaman petani tembakau Vorstenland dalam kerjasama dengan perusahaan perkebunan tembakau”, Stakeholders Workshop: Pemberdayaan Kelompok Petani dan Buruh Tani di Klaten dalam Mengantisipasi Peluang Perdagangan Tembakau Internasional, Yogyakarta, 1 Mei. Diselenggarakan oleh Pusat Studi Asia Pasifik, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Margono, S.A. 1998. “Mekanisme survival strategy: studi tentang respons petani tembakau dalam birokrasi perkebunan di Kalitengah”, Seminar Social Security and Social Policy,Yogyakarta, 28-29 Desember. Diselenggarkan oleh Pusat Penelitian Kependudukan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Padmo, S. 1998. “Wedi revisited”, Seminar Social Security and Social Policy, Yogyakarta, 28-29 Desember. Diselenggarakan oleh Pusat Penelitian Kependudukan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Wiradi, G. 2000. Reforma Agraria: Perjalanan yang belum Berakhir. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.11834

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 959 | views : 1433

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Populasi




Copyright of Jurnal Populasi ISSN 0853-6202 (PRINT), ISSN: 2476-941X (ONLINE).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Populasi Indexed by:

ROAD

web
analytics View My Stats