A Comparative study of microleakage in bioactive composite resin restoration with filled and unfilled bonding materials

Afrizal Maulana; Noor Hafida Widyastuti; Ariyani Faizah; Juwita Raditya Ningsih

doi:10.22146/majkedgiind.95122

A Comparative study of microleakage in bioactive composite resin restoration with filled and unfilled bonding materials

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.95122

Afrizal Maulana⁽¹⁾, Noor Hafida Widyastuti⁽²⁾, Ariyani Faizah⁽³⁾, Juwita Raditya Ningsih^(4*)

(1) Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The most recent development in composite resin is bioactive resin, which replaces common resin. If ignored, the tendency for shrinking in bioactive composite resin could result in microleakage. Bonding material innovations that incorporate more filler have also been created to reduce this issue and lower the possibility of microleakage. The purpose of this study is to compare the microleakage of bioactive composite resin restorations with and without filled bonding material. Thirty-two maxillary first premolar samples were split into two groups: group A containing 16 samples repaired with unfilled OptiBondTM Universal (Kerr) and group B containing 16 samples restored with filled SingleBond Universal (3 M). Utilizing ACTIVATM BioACTIVE-Restorative (Pulpdent), the samples from both groups were restored.The specimens were subjected to a 24-hour artificial saliva incubation period, succeeded by an equivalent duration of exposure to 2% methylene blue. A USB digital microscope stereo was used to measure the microleakage by observing the methylene blue 2% penetration depth. Microleakage was 8.95% in group A and 8.83% in group B, according to the results. The findings of the the parametric test using the independent t-test showed that there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in microleakage across the bioactive composite resin restoration groups. This indicates that the microlekeage of bioactive composite resin restoration is unaffected by the presence of filler in the bonding agent.

Keywords

bioactive composite resin; filled bonding material; microleakage

Full Text:

4. Juwita

References

1. Shahzad H Bin, Majeed HA. The impact of dental caries on oral health related quality of life
amongst adult population in Lahore, Pakistan. Makara Journal of Health Research. 2020;
24(1): 1–7. doi: 10.7454/msk.v24i1.1074

2. Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E. Dental Caries : The Disease and Its Clinical Management
Third Edition. 3rd ed. Vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2015. 353–354.

3. Rathi SD, Nikhade P, Chandak M, Motwani N, Rathi C, Chandak M. Microleakage in
composite resin restoration-a review article. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020; 9(12): 1006–1011.
doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/216

4. Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, Cunha RF, Maia LC, Pessan JP. Clinical performance
of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018; 73: 1–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004

5. Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, et al. In-vitro evaluation
of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive dental composite
material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022; 14(1): 55–63. doi: 10.4317/JCED.58966

6. Tohidkhah S, Kermanshah H, Ahmadi E, Jalalian B, Ranjbar Omrani L. Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8(1): 329–335. doi: 10.1002/cre2.534

7. Farooq I, Ali S, Al-Saleh S, Alhamdan EM, Alrefeai MH, Abduljabbar T, et al. Synergistic
effect of bioactive inorganic fillers in enhancing properties of dentin adhesives—a review.
Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(13): 1–15. doi: 10.3390/polym13132169

8. Bhardwaj A, Bhardwaj A, Misuriya A, Maroli S, Manjula S, Singh AK. Nanotechnology in
dentistry: Present and future. J Int Oral Health. 2014; 6(1): 121–126.

9. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal microleakage properties of activa bioactive restorative
and nanohybrid composite resin using two different adhesives in non carious cervical
lesions - an in vitro study. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017; 7(2): 1–14.

10. Alhenaki AM, Attar EA, Alshahrani A, Farooq I, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Dentin bond integrity
of filled and unfilled resin adhesive enhanced with silica nanoparticles—an sem, edx, microraman, ftir and micro-tensile bond strength study. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(7): 1093.
doi: 10.3390/polym13071093

11. Bishnoi N, Fernandes M, Lambor R. Evaluating the marginal seal of a bioactive restorative material activa Bioactive and two bulk fill composites in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2020; 6(3): 98–102.

12. Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage
at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8(1): 1–8.
doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126230

13. Ahmed A, Hassan M, Abdalla A. Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives to
dentin used in total-etch and self-etch modes. Tanta Dental Journal. 2018; 15(2): 91.
doi: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_52_17

14. Bin-Shuwaish MS, Maawadh AM, Al-Hamdan RS, Alresayes S, Ali T, Almutairi B, et al.
Influence of graphene oxide filler content on the dentin bond integrity, degree of conversion
and bond strength of experimental adhesive. A SEM, micro-Raman, FTIR and microtensile
study. Mater Res Express. 2020; 7(11): 1-13. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abcba7

15. Mirmohammadi H, Khosravi K, Kashani K, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of filler
existence on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive system. Journal of Conservative
Dentistry. 2014; 17(2): 175–178. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.128066

16. St-Pierre L, Chen L, Qian F, Vargas MA. Effect of adhesive filler content on marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry. 2017; 2(1): 1–7. doi: 10.14312/2398-029x.2017-1

17. Da Rosa WLDO, Piva E, Da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43(7): 765–776. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003

18. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding performance of
universal adhesives: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2019; 21(1): 7-26. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41975

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.95122