Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

Fahrudi Ahwan Ikhsan; Sugeng Utaya; Syamsul Bachri; Agus Sugiarto; Andri Estining Sejati

doi:10.22146/mgi.85222

Paradigma Filsafat Geografi Kontemporer: Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Keterampilan Sainstik

https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.85222

Fahrudi Ahwan Ikhsan^(1*), Sugeng Utaya⁽²⁾, Syamsul Bachri⁽³⁾, Agus Sugiarto⁽⁴⁾, Andri Estining Sejati⁽⁵⁾

(1) Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Malang,
(2) Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Malang,
(3) Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Malang,
(4) Program Studi Pendidikan Geografi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
(5) Program Studi Pendidikan Geografi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka,
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Abstrak Paradigma filsafat geografi mengalami dinamika perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan secara teori, metodelogi, dan aplikasi. Perkembangan keilmuan geografi dipengaruhi isu global, metode penelitian, statistik, komputer, internet, big data, lingkungan, manusia, dan kebijakan. Tantangan kontemporer kajian filsafat geografi harus mampu menunjukkan perkembangan ilmu geografi secara dimensi sejarah dan waktu yang terjadi sampai dengan saat ini. Artikel ini bertujuan memberikan gambaran perkembangan filsafat ilmu geografi dengan kajian ontologi, epistemologi, aksiologi, dan keterampilan sainstifik secara kontenporer. Kajian ontologi mendefinisikan geografi aspek ruang konkrit dan abstrak berdasarkan makna material fenomena geosfer. Aspek epistemologi menekankan proses metode penelitian berbasis lapangan dan online sesuai perkembangan teknologi menggunakan pendekatan deduktif atau induktif fokus pada teori maupun pengetahuan. Aspek aksiologi memberikan kebermanfaatan ilmu geografi secara online dan kehidupan manusia. Kajian filsafat geografi kontemporer menekankan penguatan konten ruang lingkup geografi berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan diaplikasikan melalui pendidikan sehingga terjadi proses hilirisasi paradigma pengetahuan. Hubungan filsafat geografi kontemporer sesuai hasil pemikiran filosofis merujuk teori dan temuan penelitian yang meningkatkan muatan esensi ilmu geografi. Penafsiran filosofis menunjukkan hakikat bidang pemikiran tentang ruang alam dan manusia. Studi perkembangan filsafat geografi kontemporer untuk menemukan pembenaran rasional secara konteks generalisasi dan sistematika faktual dengan mencermati kesenjangan pengetahuan geografi melalui proses metodelogi ilmiah. Aspek konseptual dan terminologi filsafat geografi kontemporer ditentukan tren pendekatan metodelogi ilmiah yang digunakan untuk studi geografi. Ciri khusus analisis paradigma filsafat geografi kontemporer pada saat ini hasil kombinasi harmonis landasan ilmiah dan filosofis yang konkret secara obyektif menunjukkan hubungan sains dan filsafat. Proses eksplorasi filosofis dan geografis menjadi contoh konkret berbagai riset geografi modern secara inter disiplin atau multidiplin ilmu. Pendekatan terpadu kajian analisis ruang geografi menjadi entitas dialektika metodelogi dari model tradisional menuju pendekatan integrasi menjadi identitas geografi kontemporer.

Abstract The paradigm of philosophy geography experiences the dynamics scientific development in theory, methodology and application. The scientific development geography is influenced by global issues, research methods, statistics, computers, internet, big data, environment, people, and policies. The contemporary challenge of studying philosophy geography is to be able to show development of geography in terms history and time that has occurred up to now. This article aims to provide an overview development of the philosophy geography with a contemporary study ontology, epistemology, axiology, and scientific skills. The study of ontology defines geography concrete and abstract aspects space based on the material meaning geosphere phenomena. The epistemological aspect emphasizes process field-based and online research methods according to technological developments using a deductive or inductive approach focusing on theory and knowledge. The axiological aspect provides the benefit of online geography and human life. Contemporary geographical philosophy studies emphasize the strengthening of geographic scope content based on research results and applied through education so that a knowledge paradigm downstreaming process occurs. The relationship between contemporary geographical philosophy and results of philosophical thought refer to theories and research findings that increase the essence of geographic science. Philosophical interpretation shows the nature of the field thinking about natural and human space. Study of the development contemporary geographical philosophy to find rational justification the context of factual generalizations and systematics by examining gaps in geographical knowledge through process scientific methodology. Conceptual aspects and terminology contemporary geographical philosophy determine trends in scientific methodological approaches used for study of geography. The special characteristic analysis of contemporary geographical philosophical paradigms time is the result of a harmonious combination concrete scientific and philosophical foundations that objectively shows relationship between science and philosophy. The process of philosophical and geographical exploration is a concrete example various modern geographical research in an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary manner. An integrated approach study geographic become metodhological analysis dialectical from traditional models to contemporary geographic identity.

Keywords

filsafat; geografi kontemporer; paradigma

Full Text:

PDF

References

Barbarà-I-Molinero, A., Sancha, C., Cascón-Pereira, R., & Kruger, H. A. (2019). Facilitating the transition from being a geography student to becoming a geographer in Spain: the role of professional identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(4), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1661369

Biedenbach, T., & Jacobsson, M. (2016). The Open Secret of Values: The Roles of Values and Axiology in Project Research. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700312

Blaschke, T., Hay, G. J., Kelly, M., Lang, S., Hofmann, P., Addink, E., Queiroz Feitosa, R., van der Meer, F., van der Werff, H., van Coillie, F., & Tiede, D. (2014). Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis - Towards a new paradigm. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87(December 2013), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014

Boehm, R. G., Solem, M., & Zadrozny, J. (2018). The Rise of Powerful Geography. The Social Studies, 109(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2018.1460570

Bohle, M. (2016). Handling of human-Geosphere intersections. Geosciences (Switzerland), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences6010003

Brunn, S. D. (2022). Geographers and sustainability: Five research challenges. Geography and Sustainability, 3(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.03.003

Castree, N. (2015). Geography and Global Change Science: Relationships Necessary, Absent, and Possible. Geographical Research, 53(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12100

Castree, N., Leszczynski, A., Stallins, J. A., Schwanen, T., & Patel, Z. (2022). Reconstituting Geography for the 21st century. Environment and Planning F, 1(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825211005376

Chhetri, N., Ghimire, R., & Eisenhauer, D. C. (2023). Geographies of Imaginaries and Environmental Governance. Professional Geographer, 75(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2022.2087698

Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising. Publications, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002

Clifford, N. J., & Malanson, G. P. (2019). Retrospect and prospect reconsidered: The progress of Progress in Physical Geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 43(3), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319845539

Day, T. (2017). The contribution of physical geographers to sustainability research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101851

De Lázaro Torres, M. L., De Miguel González, R., & Yago, F. J. M. (2017). WebGIS and geospatial technologies for landscape education on personalized learning contexts. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110350

Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to Write a Literature Review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617

Dijst, M. (2013). Space-Time Integration in a Dynamic Urbanizing World: Current Status and Future Prospects in Geography and GIScience: Space-Time Integration in Geography and GIScience. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1058–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.792171

Droj, G., Droj, L., & Badea, A. C. (2022). GIS-Based Survey over the Public Transport Strategy: An Instrument for Economic and Sustainable Urban Traffic Planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010016

Duarte, L., Teodoro, A. C., & Gonçalves, H. (2022). Evaluation of Spatial Thinking Ability Based on Exposure to Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Concepts in the Context of Higher Education. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11080417

Ellis, E. C. (2017). Physical geography in the Anthropocene. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(5), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317736424

Fargher, M. (2018). WebGIS for geography education: Towards a GeoCapabilities approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030111

Goudie, A. S. (2017). The integration of Human and Physical Geography revisited. Canadian Geographer, 61(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12315

Haefner, L., & Sternberg, R. (2020). Spatial implications of digitization: State of the field and research agenda. Geography Compass, 14(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12544

Harden, C. P., Luzzadder-Beach, S., MacDonald, G. M., Marston, R. A., & Winkler, J. A. (2020). Physical geography contributes. Progress in Physical Geography, 44(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319893918

He, C., He, S., Mu, E., & Peng, J. (2022). Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and innovative development. Geography and Sustainability, 3(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.05.002

Healey, R. L., & Ribchester, C. (2016). Developing ethical geography students? The impact and effectiveness of a tutorial-based approach. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1141396

Hill, J., Walkington, H., & King, H. (2018). Geographers and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515188

Hui, A., & Walker, G. (2018). Concepts and methodologies for a new relational geography of energy demand: Social practices, doing-places and settings. Energy Research and Social Science, 36(March), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.032

Jazeel, T. (2016). Between area and discipline: Progress, knowledge production and the geographies of Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 40(5), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515609713

Jo, I., Hong, J. E., & Verma, K. (2016). Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1150439

Jones, M. (2022). For a ‘new new regional geography’: plastic regions and more-than-relational regionality. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 104(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2028575

Josef Tan, H. H. (2019). What Kind of Geography Education Research is There? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 338(1), 0–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012046

Knitter, D., Augustin, K., Biniyaz, E., Hamer, W., Kuhwald, M., Schwanebeck, M., & Duttmann, R. (2019). Geography and the Anthropocene: Critical approaches needed. Progress in Physical Geography, 43(3), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319829395

Lane, S. N. (2017). Slow science, the geographical expedition, and Critical Physical Geography. Canadian Geographer, 61(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12329

Larsen, T. B., & Solem, M. (2022). Conveying the Applications and Relevance of the Powerful Geography Approach through Humanitarian Mapping. Geography Teacher, 19(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2021.2008470

Lin, S., Sidaway, J. D., van Meeteren, M., Boyle, M., & Hall, T. (2022). Trajectories of geography and public policy. Space and Polity, 26(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2149958

Lin, Y. L., Yen, M. F., & Yu, L. C. (2018). Grid-based crime prediction using geographical features. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7080298

Lukstina, G., Jürgenson, E., Ladzianska, Z., Simeonova, V., & Lozynskyy, R. (2022). The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Countries.

Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.091

Malanson, G. P., Scuderi, L., Moser, K. A., Willmott, C. J., Resler, L. M., Warner, T. A., & Mearns, L. O. (2014). The composite nature of physical geography: Moving from linkages to integration. Progress in Physical Geography, 38(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313516481

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

Miles, D. A. (2017). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps methodological gap. Journal of Research Methods and Strategies, August, 1–15.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.85222