Mobilitas, Negosiasi dan Transisi Perempuan Muda di Jawa Tengah
Oki Rahadianto Sutopo(1*), Rani Dwi Putri(2)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Post-Fordism is a relevant context in framing the issue of school to work transition faced by the young generation. In this era, the labor market not only requires energy, but also more specific skills. In addition, rapid and massive social change in the Post-Fordism era requires young people to compete at the local, national and global level. On the other hand, young people are faced with the fact that the distribution of capital has never been equally distributed in every social space. Thus, mobility is one of the important strategies for young generation as an effort to accumulate cultural, social, economic and symbolic capital. This study uses qualitative methods with observation and in-depth interviews as data collection techniques. Through the narratives of 4 young women in Central Java, this study concludes that they must reflexively strategize under particular conditions where social inequality is manifested in the spatial dimension, while at the same time intersects with gender and social class. From family support and opportunities for educational scholarships, two young women utilize mobilities to respond social change towards a new economy amid limited amount of capital accumulation. Two other young women had to to lose their opportunity to achieve upward class mobility. Thus structural and cultural obstacles as women and social class, make it difficult for two young women to upgrade their own capital; thus social change towards Post-Fordism tends to be a threat rather than an opportunity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andres, Lesley and Johanna Wyn. 2010. The Making of a Generation: The Children of The 1970s in Adulthood. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. “Statistik Migrasi Jawa Tengah”. Diakses dari https://www.bps.go.id/publicationpada 15 Mei 2019.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. “Demak Dalam Angka”. Diakses dari https://jateng.bps.go.id/publicationpada 10 Mei 2019.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. “Kecamatan Banyundono Dalam Angka”. Diakses dari https://jateng.bps.go.id/publicationpada 10 Mei 2019.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. “Kabupaten Boyolali Dalam Angka”. Diakses dari https://jateng.bps.go.id/publicationpada 10 Mei 2019.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2010. “Statistik Migrasi Jawa Tengah”. Diakses dari https://www.bps.go.id/publicationpada 15 Mei 2019.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. “Statistik Pemuda Indonesia”. Diakses dari https://www.bps.go.id/publicationpada 10 Mei 2019.
Beck, Ulrich. 2016. The Metamorphosis of the World. UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The forms of capital”. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Edited by J. Richardson. New York: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Standford: Standford University Press.
Colonna, Elena. 2019. “Children and Urban Space in Maputo”. in Youth, Inequality and Social Change in The Global South. edited by Hernan Cuervo and Ana Miranda. Singapore: Springer.
Cuervo, Hernan and Ana Miranda. 2019. “Youth in the Global South: An Introduction”. in Youth, Inequality and Social Change in The Global South. edited by Hernan Cuervo and Ana Miranda. Singapore: Springer.
Effendi, T. 2004. “Mobilitas Pekerja, Remitan dan Peluang Berusaha di Pedesaan”. Jurnal Sosial Politik 8(2): 213-230.
Fakih, Mansour. 2008. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
Farrugia, David. 2018. “Youthfulness and Immaterial Labour in The New Economy”. The Sociological Review 66 (2) Pp. 511-526.
Farrugia, D. 2014. “Toward A Spatialised Youth Sociology: The Rural and The Urban In Times Of Change”. Journal of Youth Studies 17(3): 293-307.
Furlong, Andy, Woodman, D. and J. Wyn. 2011. “Changing Times, Changing Perspectives: Reconciling ‘transition’ and’cultural’ perspectives on Youth and Young Adulthood”. Journal of Sociology 47 (4), 355-370.
Henderson, Sheila, et al. 2007. Inventing Adulthoods a Biographical Approach to Youth Transitions. New York: Sage.
Heffernan, Nick. 2000. Capital, Glass and Technology in Contemporary American Culture: Projecting Post-Fordism. London: Pluto Press.
Kelly, P. 2011. “Youth at Risk: process of individualization and Responsibilisation in the Risk Society”. Discourse 22(1): 23-33.
Khoo, Yen Choon and Brenda A Yeoh. 2018. “The Entanglements of Migration and Marriege: Negotiating Mobility Project among Young Indonesian Women from Migrant-sending Villages”. Journal of Intercultural Studies 39 (6), Pp. 704-721.
Lash, S. 2018. Ulrich Beck: Risk as Indeterminate Modernity. Theory Culture & Society 35(7-8): 117-129.
Mannheim, K. 1952. The Problem of Generations’ in Mannheim, K. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: RKP.
Minza, Marina Wenty. 2012. “Migran Muda dan Transisi dari Pendidikan ke Dunia Kerja di Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat”. Jurnal Studi Pemuda 1 (2) Pp. 153-164.
Nilan, Pam. 2011. “Youth Sociology Must Cross Cultures”. Youth Studies Australia 30 (3) Pp. 20-26.
Rabe. Marlize, et al. 2019. “Hope for a Better Future: Young People’s (im)Mobility in Pretoria
Central, South Africa”. in Youth, Inequality and Social Change in The Global South. edited by Hernan Cuervo and Ana Miranda. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Roberts, Ken. 2007. “Youth Transitions and Generations: A Response to Wyn and Woodman”. Journal of Youth Studies 10(2): 263-269.
Robertson S. Harris. A and Baldassar L. 2018. “Mobile Transitions: A Conceptual Framework For Researching Generation On The Move”. Journal of Youth Studies 21(2): 2013-217.
Schutz, Alfred. 1972. Collected Papers 1: The Problem of Social Reality. Netherlands: Springer.
Sutopo, Oki Rahadianto. 2019. “Mobility, Capital and Youth Transitions in Indonesia”. in Youth, Inequality and Social Change in The Global South. edited by Hernan Cuervo and Ana Miranda. Singapore: Springer.
Threadgold, Steven and Pam Nilan. 2009. Reflexivity of Comtemporary Youth, Risk and Cultural Capital. Current Sociology 54 (1) Pp. 47-68.
Threadgold, Steven. 2017. Youth, Class and Everyday Struggles. London: Routledge.
Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Walby, Sylvia. 1994. “Gender, Work, and Post-Fordisme: The EC Context”. International Journal of Sociology 24 (4) Pp 67-82.
Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. USA: Routledge.
Woodman, Dan and Johanna Wyn. 2013. “Youth Policy and Generations: Why Youth Policy Needs to ‘rethink youth’”. Social Policy and Society 12 (2) Pp. 265-275.
Woodman, Dan and Johanna Wyn. 2015. “Class, Gender and Generation Matter: Using the Concept of Social Generation to Study Inequality and Social Change”. Journal of Youth Studies 18 (10) Pp 1402-1410.
Woodman, Dan and Andy Bennet. 2015. “Cultures, Transitions, And Generations: The Case For A NewYouth Studies”. In Youth Cultures, Transitions, and Generations: Bridging The Gap In Youth Research. Edited by Dan Woodman and Andy Bennett. UK: Palgrave.
Wyn, Johanna and Woodman, Dan. 2006. “Generation, Youth, and Social Change in Australia”. Journal of Youth Studies 9 (5), 495-514.
Woodman, Dan and Johanna Wyn. 2015. Youth and Generation: Rethinking Change and Inequalityin The Lives of Young People. London: Sage.
Zhao, Minghua. 2002. “Emotional Labour in a Globalised Labour Market: Seafarers on Cruise Ships”. Working Paper Series School of Social Sciences Cardiff University.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.45962
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3779 | views : 2708Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Studi Pemuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemuda (Online ISSN 2527-3639; Print ISSN 2252-9020) is published by the Youth Studies Centre in collaboration with Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada. |