Haruskah Aku Bekerja? (Studi Fenomenologi Keputusan Bekerja pada Pemuda Penyandang Disabilitas di Empat Wilayah di Jawa Tengah)
Fuji Riang Prastowo(1*), Irmaningsih Pudyastuti(2), Bangkit Rygen Dewantara(3)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Coping is one form of strategy to deal with stigma and all forms of social pressure that lead obstacles to the growth of young people with disabilities. In this case, coping can be interpreted as a person's effort to overcome the obstacles experienced with certain strategies. In the context of persons with disabilities, the community often views persons with disabilities as a weak marginal group as being dependant to family so that there is no demand to work like humans in general. In addition, there are little opportunity for them to work in the formal sectors causes many of them to be coping with their own efforts for being independent. Therefore, this paper seeks to explore more about coping strategies carried out by youth with disabilities to decide to work. This paper comes from the results of field research with phenomenological qualitative methods in May-June 2018 through FGD and in-depth interviews conducted in four regions in Central Java Province namely Demak Regency, Semarang City, Semarang Regency, and Boyolali Regency. The results of the study indicate that the decision to work or not work from young people with disabilities comes from the response of external factors. Coping is then born into three level : the appraisal-focused level, emotions (the emotion-focused), and actions (problem-focused), which are not linear but can occur differently for each individual depending on the context of growth and development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ben-Zur, H. (2009). "Coping styles and affect". International Journal of Stress Management. 16 (2): 87–101.
Buletin Jendela Data dan Informasi Kesehatan (2014). Situasi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Buletin Jendela Data dan Informasi Kesehatan. Semester 11 2014. Diunduh darihttp://www.depkes.go.id/download.php?file=download/pusdatin/buletin/buletin-disabilitas.pdf
Carver, Charles S.; Connor-Smith, Jennifer (2010). "Personality and Coping". Annual Review of Psychology. 61: 679–704.
Cheek, J. M. (1989). Identity orientations and self-inter- pretation. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 275-285). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cross, Susan E., Erin E. Hardin, and Berna Gercek Swing. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15:142–179.
Embree, L. (1997). What is phenomenology. Dalam L. Embree, E. A. Behnke, D. Carr, J. C. Evans, & J. Huertas-Jourda et al. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia Of Phenomenology (Vol. 18, hal. 1-10). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Finlay, Linda. (1999). Applying Phenomenology in Research : Problems, Principles and Practices. British Journal of Occupational Therapy July 1999 62(7)
Gerhardt, Uta. (1979). Coping and social action: theoretical reconstruction of the life-event approach. Sociology of Health and Illness Vol. 1 No. 2 1979
Kitayama, Shinobu, Sean Duffy, and Yukiko Uchida. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In Handbook of cultural psychology. Edited by Shinobu Kitayama and Dov Cohen, 136–174. New York: Guilford.
Krapfl, J. E. (2016). Behaviorism and Society. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 123–129
Kuo, B. C. H. (2011). Culture’s consequences on coping: Theories, evidences, and dimensionalities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1084–110
Laverty, S. (2003). Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2003, 2(3).
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234–247
Lehn, Dirk vom and Ronald Hitzler. (2015). Phenomenology Based Ethnography: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2015, Vol. 44(5) 539–543
Lories, G. (1996). Behaviorism. Behavioural Processes, 37(2-3), 261–263
Marcus, G. (1995). “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24 (1): 95-117.
Mead, George Herbert. (1972). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Moore, J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449–463.
Novia, Dyah Ratna. (Oct, 2015). 11.5 Juta Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia Berusia Produktif. Republika.co.id. Diakses dari laman https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/umum/15/10/28/nwwekm383-115-juta-penyandang-disabilitas-di-indonesia-berusia-produktif, pada 10 oktober 2018.
Oyserman, Daphna, and Spike W. S. Lee. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin 134:311–342.
Parkovnick, S. (2015). The Behaviorism of George Herbert Mead. The American Sociologist, 46(2), 288–293
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.
Skinner, B.F. (1965). Science and Human Behavior. Harvard: Free Press.
Snyder, C.R. (1999) Coping: The Psychology of What Works. New York: Oxford University Press
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520
Wojnar, D. M. and Swanson, K. M. (2007). Phenomenology: An Exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing Volume 25 Number 3. September 2007, 172-180.
Yeh, C., Inose, M., Kobori, A., & Chang, T. (2001). Self and coping among college students in Japan. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 242–256
Zeidner, M. & Endler, N.S. (eds) (1996) Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York: John Wiley.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.39645
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3523 | views : 4435Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Studi Pemuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemuda (Online ISSN 2527-3639; Print ISSN 2252-9020) is published by the Youth Studies Centre in collaboration with Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada. |