PENDEKATAN AUTOETNOGRAFI DALAM PENELITIAN ARTISTIK: STUDI KASUS DAN IMPLIKASI METODOLOGIS

Ida Bagus Gede Surya Peradantha

doi:10.22146/jksks.95192

PENDEKATAN AUTOETNOGRAFI DALAM PENELITIAN ARTISTIK: STUDI KASUS DAN IMPLIKASI METODOLOGIS

https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.95192

Ida Bagus Gede Surya Peradantha^(1*)

(1) Institut Seni Budaya Indonesia Tanah Papua
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The primary aim of this research is to enhance understanding of autoethnographic perspectives in artistic research. It also seeks to explore the contributions, challenges, and potential of this approach in expanding creative knowledge. Certain artists may perceive the evaluation of their own artworks as excessively subjective, which may lead to doubts regarding the scientific rigor of the subsequent research. This study examines various autoethnographic models within artistic research and their application in previous studies. Employing a qualitative framework, this study utilizes a literature review approach. Content analysis was employed to extract data from relevant documents, while meta-synthesis was used for comprehensive analysis. This study uncovers that there are four distinct kinds of autoethnographic approaches: realistic, impressionistic, expressionistic, and conceptualistic. These models provide several frameworks that can be utilized for studies focused on artwork, practice, studio, and reflective experiences, particularly in relation to the subjective experiences of creators. This study discovered a theory of artistic experience that is strongly linked to the fusion of the artistic research model and the autoethnographic approach model. This research has profound implications for broadening art research approaches, enhancing comprehension of the creative process, promoting critical cultural analysis, producing novel theories of artist experience, and fostering future art and autoethnographic research.

Keywords

Approach; Artistic research; Autoethnography; Implications; Methodology

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Adams, T. E., & Herrmann, A. F. (2020). Expanding Our Autoethnographic Future. Journal of Autoethnography, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2020.1.1.1 Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. Allen-Collinson, J. (2013). Autoethnography as the engagement of self/other, self/culture, self/politics, selves/futures. Handbook of Autoethnography, 281–299. Belbase, S., Luitel, B., & Taylor, P. (2008). Autoethnography: A method of research and teaching for transformative education. Journal of Education and Research, 1(1), 86–95. Budiawan, H., & Martyastiadi, Y. S. (2020). The Explanation of Life Experience Reflection as Ideas of Artistic Research. International Journal of Creative and Arts Studies, 7(2), 145–152. Choi, S. K. (2022). The (de)situated subjective: a cognitive autoethnography of ‘the New York School.’ Journal of Visual Art Practice, 21(2), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2022.2069917 Ellis, C. (2000). Creating criteria: An ethnographic short story. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 273–277. Gemtou, E. (2010). Subjectivity in art history and art criticism. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(1), 2–13. Gerber, N., Templeton, E., Chilton, G., Liebman, M. C., Manders, E., & Shim, M. (2012). Art-based research as a pedagogical approach to studying intersubjectivity in the creative arts therapies. Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 3(1), 39–48. Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75–80. Godin, M.-A., Kallio-Tavin, M., & Qureshi, A. (2021). Critical Artistic Research and Arts Practices as Forms of (Radical) Care. Research in Arts and Education, 2021(4), i–vii. Grüning, D. J., & Krueger, J. I. (2021). The experience heuristic. Journal of Expertise, 4(3). Grushka, K. (2005). Artists as reflective self‐learners and cultural communicators: an exploration of the qualitative aesthetic dimension of knowing self through reflective practice in art‐making. Reflective Practice, 6(3), 353–366. Guntur. (2016). Metode Penelitian Artistik. ISI Press. Hadi, S., Tjahjono, H. K., & Palupi, M. (2020). Systematic Review: meta sintesis untuk riset perilaku organisasional. Yogyakarta: Vivavictory. Hanna, J. (1979). To Dance Is Human: A Theory of Nonverbal Communication. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press, 30. https://doi.org/10.2307/851611 Hannula, M., Suoranta, J., & Vadén, T. (2014). Artistic research methodology. Narrative, Power and the Public, 27(3), 17–22. Holmes, P., & O’Neill, G. (2010). Autoethnography and self-reflection: Tools for self-assessing intercultural competence. Irwansyah, A., & Oemar, E. A. B. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Eksplorasi Motif Batik Untuk Anak Di Sanggar Lukis Ceria Studio Surabaya. Jurnal Seni Rupa, 9(3), 25–37. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2008). Experience and “I” in autoethnography: A deconstruction. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 299–318. Jensen-Hart, S., & Williams, D. J. (2010). Blending voices: Autoethnography as a vehicle for critical reflection in social work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(4), 450–467. Kim, G. (2021). “Julius Caesar was the last emperor”: Students’ understanding of world history. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(3), 195–210. Leary, H., & Walker, A. (2018). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis methodologies: Rigorously piecing together research. TechTrends, 62(5), 525–534. Listiani, W., Rustiyanti, S., Sari, F. D., & Peradantha, I. B. G. S. (2019). Augmented Reality Pasua Pa Sebagai Alternatif Media Pembelajaran Seni Pertunjukan 4.0. Panggung, 29(3). Madison, D. S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Sage publications. Malterud, N. (2012). Artistic research–necessary and challenging. Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 1. Méndez, M. (2013). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279–287. Orel, M. (2023). Autoethnography in the modern workplace: a reflexive journey. Journal of Organizational Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-06-2023-0038 Peradantha, I. B. G. S., Listiani, W., Rustiyanti, S., & Dila Sari, F. (2019). Wor sebagai Sumber Inspirasi Gerak Tari dalam Penciptaan Tari Karwar. In N. Y. K. ; S. I. ; A. I. Lahpan (Ed.), Strategi Pelestarian Budaya Masyarakat Adat (pp. 347–355). Prodi Antropologi Budaya bekerjasama dengan Sunan Ambu Press. Peradantha, I. B. G. S., Rustiyanti, S., Listiani, W., & Dila Sari, F. (2021). Situs Megalitik Tutari sebagai Sumber Inspirasi Penciptaan Koreografi Site-Specific “Tutari MegArt Lithic.” Dance and Theatre Review, 4(1), 1–9. Pitard, J. (2017). A journey to the centre of self: Positioning the researcher in autoethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), 20. Rafi, H. (2021). The Necessity / Possibility to Re-name: A Spiritual Autoethnography. Anthropology and Humanism, 46(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/anhu.12320 Ruspawati, I. A. W. (2023a). Aktualisasi Konsep Hredaya Kamala Madya dalam Penciptaan Tari Kamala Madya di Desa Tanjung Benoa, Bali. Dance and Theatre Review, 6(2), 82–91. Ruspawati, I. A. W. (2023b). Architectural Adaptations and Spatial Reconfigurations for the Ngerebeg Dance Performance in Pura Dalem Kangin in Indonesia. Journal of the International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 10(7), 395–411. https://isvshome.com/pdf/ISVS_10-7/ISVSej_10.7.24_Ida.pdf Rutten, K. (2016). Art, ethnography and practice-led research. Critical Arts, 30(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2016.1205317 Ryan, G. S. (2017). An introduction to the origins, history and principles of ethnography. Nurse Researcher, 24(4), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2017.e1470 Shakka, A. (2019). Berbicara Autoetnografi: Metode Reflektif Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Lensa Budaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya, 14(1). Siregar, R. E. (2018). Kajian Fotografi Melalui Pendekatan Autoetnografi Pada Penelitian Berbasis Seni. Urban: Jurnal Seni Urban, 2(2), 141–157. Skinner, J. (2003). Montserrat Place and Mons’ rat Neaga: an example of impressionistic autoethnography. The Qualitative Report, 8(3), 513–529. Sparkes, A. C. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21–43. Teowarang, J. R., & Kusumowidagdo, A. (2023). Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Batik Artisan Disabilitas Topeng Malangan Untuk Praktik Keberlanjutan Fashion. Jurnal LeECOM (Leverage, Engagement, Empowerment of Community), 5(2), 201–210. Voloder, L. (2008). Autoethnographic challenges: Confronting self, field and home. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 19(1), 27–40. Walker, S. (2009). Artmaking, subjectivity, and signification. Studies in Art Education, 51(1), 77–91. Widyastuti, I. A. G. S. (2023). Reinterpretasi Ideologi Laut Dalam Penciptaan Karya Seni Mina Maha Manu. In N. N. D. Pebriyani (Ed.), Prosiding Bali Dwipantara Waskita: Seminar Nasional Republik Seni Nusantara (pp. 155–169). UPT Pusat Penerbitan LP2MPP ISI Denpasar. https://eproceeding.isi-dps.ac.id/index.php/bdw/article/view/424/252 Wood, C. A. (2017). My story of Sal: A critical self-reflective autoethnography revealing whiteness in the classroom. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 19(1), 41–59.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.95192