The Accuracy of Risanto's Formula and Ultrasound Measurement in Estimating Fetal Weight

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.37942

Elsina Krisnawati Pietersz(1*), Irwan Taufiqur Rachman(2), Risanto Siswosudarmo(3)

(1) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM
(2) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM
(3) Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Accurate estimated fetal weight (EFW) is crucial in determining delivery management. Several methods to estimate fetal weight were used such as abdominal palpation, measurement of symphisis fundal height (SFH), and ultrasound examination. Risanto’s formula based on Indonesian population had been already proven to be more accurate than Johnson’s formula. The formula was as follows: Y = 125 X - 880 where Y was EFW in grams, X was SFH in cm, and 125 was the constanta.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto’s formula and ultrasound examination in estimating fetal weight.

Method: A cross sectional study was carried out in Sardjito hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada, from March 2013 to March 2014. A total of 400 pregnant women meeting the inclusion criteria at 37 – 42 weeks of gestation were recruited. The estimated fetal weight using Risanto’s formula (R_EFW) was compared to the estimated fetal weight using ultrasound measurement (U_EFW). The U_EFW was done by obstetricians on duty or senior residents using Hadlock’s formula. Actual birth weight (ABW) was measured using the same calibrated baby scale. Accuracy was determined by comparing the mean difference between the R_EFW minus ABW (ΔR_EFW) and the U_EFW minus ABW (ΔU_EFW). Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis.

Result and Discussion: The mean ABW was 3025.3 ± 414.6 gram and the mean R_EFW was 2972.7 ± 365.4 grams, while the mean U_EFW was 3058.7 ± 423.2 grams. The mean ΔR_EFW was lower than the mean ΔU_EFW (178.2 ± 147.6 grams vs 197.5 ± 155.4 grams; 95% CI 1.24 – 36.68; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Risanto’s formula was more accurate than ultrasound measurement in estimating fetal weight.

Keywords: Estimated fetal weight, Risanto’s formula, Ultrasonography, Fundal height


Keywords


Estimated fetal weight; Risanto’s formula; Ultrasonography; Fundal height; Perkiraan berat janin; formula Risanto; Ultrasonografi; tinggi fundus

Full Text:

PDF


References

Lalys L, Pineau JC, Guihard-Costa a M. 2014. Small and large foetuses: Identification and estimation of foetal weight at delivery from third-trimester ultrasound data. Early Hum Dev. Elsevier Ltd; 2010 Dec [cited 2014 May 29];86(12):753–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/20826073 Shittu a S, Kuti O, Orji EO. 2014. Comparison of clinical and ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2005 Aug [cited 2014 May 29];90(2):140–1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963999 Numprasert W. 2004. A Study in Johnson ’ s Formula : Fundal Height Measurement for Estimation of Birth Weight. 2004;8(1):15–20.

Siswosudarmo R. 2014. Developing New Formula For Estimating Birth Weight at Term Pregnancy. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi:145-149 Vol.1 No.2 Agustus 2014; 2014. p. 145–9.

Titisari, Hanifah; Siswosudarmo R. 2013. Risanto’s Formula is more Accurate in Determining Estimated Fetal Weight Based on Maternal Height. Indones J Obs Gynecol Vol1, No 3 July 2013.

Dudley NJ. 2014. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2014 May 27];25(1):80–9. Available from: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505877

Morse K, Williams A, Gardosi J. 2009. Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2009 Dec [cited 2014 May 27];23(6):809–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19914874

Heer IM, A, Kümper C, Vögtle N, B, Müller-Egloff S, et al. 2008. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Ultrasonic Fetal Weight Estimation [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2014 Jul 6]. Available from: http://epub.ub.unimuenchen.de/16734/1/10_1159_000116742.pdf

Predanic M, Cho A, Ingrid F, Pellettieri J. 2002. Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight. 2002;495–500.

Perni SC, Predanic M, Cho JE, Kalish RB, Chasen ST. 2004. Association of Amniotic Fluid Index. 2004;i:1449–52.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.37942

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 439 | views : 548

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi



Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Indexed by:

 



SEKRETARIAT JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI
Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM/RS Dr. Sardjito
Jl. Kesehatan No. 1, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
Tlp: (0274) 511329 / Faks: (0274) 544003
Email: jurnal.kesehatanreproduksi@ugm.ac.id
Cp: Dwi Astuti +6281802698043