* Corresponding Author
Good or Bad Governance for Whom? Governance is a Trojan Horse for Capital Expansion in Pati, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.89148 Arif Novianto(1*)
(1) Department of Public Policy and Management, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Governance as theory and practice, since the end of the 20th century, has been disseminated as the best form of public management. This notion of governance emphasizes reducing state actor authority, and in the name of participation, the voice of the state actor is positioned on par with the voices of private actors and civil society. To support the concept of governance, international organizations and financial institutions (United Nation, World Bank & IMF) promote the principles of "good governance" as the antithesis of "bad governance" which is characterized as corrupt, undemocratic and detrimental to the people. This research challenges governance theory and practice, with a case study of Indocement Ltd (Heidelberg Cement Group) expansion in Central Java, Indonesia. This research uses an ethnographic method, which was carried out in two periods, in 2014-2015 and 2017-2018. The contribution of this research is that instead of being happily accepted by the people, governance and the principles of good governance were actually opposed by the grassroots community in the case of Indocement Ltd's development plan in the Kendeng Mountains, Pati Regency, Central Java. This resistance was motivated by the use of governance and the principles of "good governance" to force the construction of a cement factory. In fighting against these problems, the people's movement advocated democracy from below through a counter-hegemonic movement that involved people, until finally it succeeded in thwarting a project to build a cement factory in their place. For people who reject the cement factory plan, governance is "good" for capital, but "bad" for the environment and people's livelihoods.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asaduzzaman, M., & Virtanen, P. (2016). Governance Theories and Models. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer.
De Angelis, M. (2005). The political economy of global neoliberal governance. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 229–257.
Demmers, J., Jilberto, A. E. F., & Hogenboom, B. (2004). Good governance in the era of global neoliberalism: Conflict and depolitization in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Routledge.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. UGM Press.
Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 509–522.
Farazmand, A. (2015). Governance in the age of globalization: Challenges and opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia: Trends, Issues and Challenges, 11–26.
Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17, 595–617.
Fayissa, B., & Nsiah, C. (2013). The impact of governance on economic growth in Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 91–108.
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy (Issue 2012/30). WIDER Working Paper.
Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for good governance in the 21st century (Policy Brief No. 15). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Institute on Governance.
Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo‐institutionalist perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718.
Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.
Jokinen, J. (2004). Balancing between East and West: The Asian Development Bank’s policy on good governance. In Global Institutions and Development (pp. 137–150). Routledge.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. R. (2003). Has governance eclipsed government? Patterns if environmental instrument selection and use in eight states and the EU. CSERGE Working Paper EDM.
Keping, Y. (2018). Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 1–8.
Kiely, R. (1998). Neo liberalism revised? A critical account of World Bank concepts of good governance and market friendly intervention. Capital & Class, 22(1), 63–88.
Laha, A. (2016). Association between Governance and Human Development in South Asia: A cross country analysis. In Handbook of Research on Global Indicators of Economic and Political Convergence (pp. 254–273). IGI Global.
Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. duke university Press.
Novianto, A. (2016). Perlawanan rakyat: Analisa kontra-hegemoni dalam ekonomi politik kebijakan pembangunan pabrik semen di pati.
Novianto, A. (2018). Berebut Saminisme: Artikulasi politik masyarakat adat dalam konflik pembangunan pabrik semen di pegunungan Kendeng. Kebijakan Publik Dalam Pusaran Perubahan Ideologi Dari Kuasa Negara Ke Dominasi Pasar, 228â.
Novianto, A., Effendi, K. C., & Purbokusumo, Y. (2021). The Politics of Virtue for Capital Accumulation: CSR and Social Conflict in the Construction of the Indocement Factory in Pati, Indonesia. PCD Journal, 9(1).
Novianto, A., & Wulansari, A. D. (2023). Responding to Elite Consolidation: The Anti-Cement-Factory Movement Resisting Oligarchy in an Indonesian Local Election. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(3), 298–310.
O’Reilly, K. (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. Sage.
Peet, R. (2009). Unholy trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pepinsky, T. (2014). The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 631–653.
Said, J., Alam, M. M., & Khalid, M. A. (2016). Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on the public sector of Malaysia. Humanomics, 32(2), 151–171.
Schneider, V. (2004). State theory, governance and the logic of regulation and administrative control. Governance in Europe, 25–41.
Springer, S. (2010). Neoliberal discursive formations: On the contours of subjectivation, good governance, and symbolic violence in posttransitional Cambodia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 931–950.
Stojanović, I., Ateljević, J., & Stević, R. S. (2016). Good governance as a tool of sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4), 558–558.
Taylor, I. (2004). Hegemony, neoliberal ‘good governance’and the International Monetary Fund: A Gramscian perspective. In Global institutions and development (pp. 124–136). Routledge.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme. http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/ policy
Wiratraman, H. P. (2007). Neo-Liberalisme, Good Governance, dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Jentera XV, Januari-Maret, 4–8.
World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. The World Bank.
Yousaf, M., Ihsan, F., & Ellahi, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens’ trust in Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 200–209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.89148
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3215
| 
views : 1476
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.