Determining Public Value of Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.35734

Laeli Nur Khanifah(1*), Achmad Nurmandi(2)

(1) Universitas Muhamamdiyah Yogyakarta (UMY)
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Public infrastructure is very important for tourism and cultural activities in Yogyakarta as one of the largest tourist cities in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the public value of three public investment projects in Yogyakarta, including, Flyover, Jalan 0 Km, and Grahatama Library. Flyover represents infrastructure projects in the form of roads, zero KM represents one of Yogyakarta's biggest tourist destination icons, and Grahatama Library represents a difficult development project. This study uses the cost-effectiveness analysis of each project using qualitative methods through interviews and secondary data analysis of three research sites. This method is used to be able to analyze the publicity value of various types of infrastructure projects in Yogyakarta and how their implications are for the economy. The results show that the construction of the three projects has the potential to produce results that will improve community welfare and increase income distribution, implying that the project values investment costs. Thus, despite the fact that in connection with the cost of the Grahatama library project, far exceeds the short economic value it generates, in the long run, the existence of libraries by increasing public access to knowledge will contribute to regional development.


Keywords


construction project, cost efficiency, public value management

Full Text:

PDF


References

Aldridge, R., & Stoker, G. (2002). Advancing a New Public Service Ethos. Londres: New Local Government Network. Retrieved from http://www.nlgn.org.uk/pdfs/upload/Advancing a New Public Service Ethos.pdf

Arikunto, S. (2002). Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value: Theory and Practice. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.

Blocher, E. J., Stout, D. E., & Cokins, G. (2010). Cost management: A strategic emphasis. Includes index.

Christian, L., Rosalina, R., Melissa, M., & Rosalia, R. (2013). Evaluasi Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Sistem Informasi Operasional menggunakan Metode Cost Benefit Analysis: Studi Kasus pada Restaurant Sea Food di Jakarta. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 4(2), 1340. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v4i2.2671

Dewi, Y. N. (2014). ANALISIS BIAYA-MANFAAT PADA PROYEK PENINGKATAN RUAS JALAN PROVINSI Studi Kasus: Ruas Jalan Wonosari-Semin Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Flynn, J. O. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value : Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. 66(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x

Handoko, T. H. (2003). Manajemen Edisi Kedua. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Hani Handoko, T. (2003). Manajemen edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Khoiruddin, I. (n.d.). Usai direnovasi, KM 0 Yogyakarta sering memakan korban kuda jatuh. Retrieved November 27, 2019, from https://www.brilio.net/news/usai-direnovasi-km-0-yogyakarta-sering-memakan-korban-kuda-jatuh-1512239.html

Kurniawan, H. (2008). Optimasi Interval Waktu Perawatan Pencegahan Dengan Penggantian Pada Komponen Kritis Lokomotif CC 203 Berbasis Reliability Dengan Metode Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Dan Model Minimasi Biaya. Telkom University.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif, terjemah buku Qualitative Data Analysis. Penerjemah Tjetjep Rohidi dan Mulyarto, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metode penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moore, M. H., & Harrison, M. (n.d.). Creating public value.

Novan Dwi Aryansyah dan Retno Indrayani. (2012). Analisa Manfaat Dan Biaya Rusunawa Jemundo, Sidoarjo. Jurnal Teknik Pomits, 1(1)(1), 1–5. Retrieved from http://digilib.its.ac.id/public/ITS-paper-23168-paperpdf.pdf

Octariani, D., Akram, A., & Animah, A. (2017). Good Governance, Performance Based Budgeting, and SKPD Budget Quality SKPD. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 21(2), 126–141.

Purwaningsih, M. R. (2012). Analisis biaya manfaat sosial keberadaan pembangkit listrik tenaga sampah Gedebage bagi masyarakat sekitar. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 23(3), 225–240.

Setiawan, T. H., & Ariadi, T. (2012). INDIKATOR KEBERHASILAN PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN BANGUNAN GEDUNG YANG DIPENGARUHI FAKTOR INTERNAL SITE MANAGER. 11(2), 128–134.

Stroker, B. R. P., Oliver, J., & Holmes, W. (2006). C enter for E ffective P ublic P olicy Five Reasons Why Judges Should Become More Involved in Establishing , Leading , and Participating on Collaborative , Policy-Focused Teams Introduction. 1–11.

Sudarwanto, B., Wahyuningrum, S. H., Iswanto, D., & Nugroho, S. (2007). Pranata Pembangunan Bidang Arsitektur.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.

Ubaidillah, A. (2017). A Study of Good Governance Index in Yogyakarta Special Region Between 2012 and 2016. 21(May), 13–28.

Yang, K. (2016). Creating public value and institutional innovations across boundaries: An integrative process of participation, legitimation, and implementation. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 873–885.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.35734

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2829 | views : 1981

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.