ACCOUNTABILITY PRESSURE AS DEBIASER FOR CONFIRMATION BIAS IN INFORMATION SEARCH AND TAX CONSULTANT’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Fauzan - Misra(1*), Slamet Sugiri(2), Eko Suwardi(3), Ertambang Nahartyo(4)
(1) Andalas University
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AlCPA). (1995). A1CPA Professional Standards and Code of Professional Conduct. New York. NY: AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2008). AICPA Professional Standards. New York, NY: AICPA.
Andre, Sean. (2008). Confirmatory behavior in tax: Exploring how advisors search for and evaluate information. Diakses dari ssrn.com dengan tautan http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093370
Cloyd, C. (1997). Performance in tax research tasks: the joint effects of knowledge and accountability. The AccountingReview, 72: 111–132.
Cloyd, C. B., & B. C. Spilker. (1999). The influence of client preferences on tax professionals’ search for judicial precedents, subsequent judgments and recommendations. The Accounting Review 74 (3): 299–322.
DeZoort, T., P.Harrison & M. Taylor. (2006). Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organization and Society 31: 373-390
Ditto, P. H. & D. F Lopez. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and non-preferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63: 568-584
Ditto, P. H.,G. D. Munro., A. M. Apanovitch., J. A. Scepansky &L. K. Lockhart. (2003). Spontaneous skepticism: The interplay of motivation and expectation in response to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 1120-1132.
Gibbins, M., & J.D. Newton. (1994). An empirical exploration of complex accountability in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Research 32: 165–186.
Hansen, V. J & R. A. White. (2012). An investigation of the impact of tax preparer penalty provision on tax payers aggresiveness. The Journal of American Taxation Association 34(1): 137-165.
Kadous, K., A. Magro & B. Spilker. (2008). Do effects of client preference on accounting professionals’ information search persist with high practice risk? The Accounting Review 83 (1): 133–156.
Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 231–245.
Koch, C & S. E. Salterio. (2015). Effects of client pressure and audit firm management control systems on auditor judgments. Working Paper.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–498.
Lee, S.Y. (2015). Factors affecting audit revenues. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 102: 6-9
Lerner, J. S. &P. E. Tetlock. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (2), 255–275.
Libby, R., R. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27: 775–811.
Misra, Fauzan., S. Sugiri., E. Suwardi & E. Nahartyo. (2018). Information search behavior and tax consultants’ recommendation: Experimental examination on the role of social norms. Working Paper: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175-220
Nisbett, R., & L. Ross. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice Hall.
Olvera, R. M. (2012). Auditors’ information search and documentation: Does knowledge of the client preference or PCAOB accountability pressure matter? University of North Texas: Dissertation.
Raush, A., & A. Brauneis. (2015). It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information. Central European Journal of Operations Research 23: 313-344
Republik Indonesia. (2014). PMK No. 111/PMK.03/2014 tentang Konsultan Pajak
Rufus, R. J.& Sennetti, J. T. (2007). Jurors’ evaluations of decision-aid use in a tax malpractice setting. Paper read at 2007 ABO Research Conference, Philadelphia.
Schafer, B.A & J. K. Schafer. (2009). Justification and self-review: mitigating irrelevant effects in fraud judgments, in Vicky Arnold (ed.) Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research (Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Volume 12) Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 41 – 59
Schlenker, B. & M. Leary. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641–669.
Simone, L.D., R. C. Sansing & J. K. Seidman. (2008). When are enhanced relationship tax compliance program mutually beneficial? The Accounting Review 88 (6): 1971-1991.
Simonson, I & B. M. Staw.(1992). De-escalation strategy: a comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing course of action. Journal of Applied Psychology 77: 419-426.
Stephenson, T. (2010). Measuring tax payers’s motivation to hire tax preparers: the development of a for-construct scale. Advances in Taxation 19: 95-121
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organization Behavior 7: 297-332.
Tetlock, P.E, L. Skitka, & R. Boettger. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (4): 632–640.
Tetlock, P. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331–376.
Turner, C. W. (2001). Accountability demands and the auditors’ evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action). Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 683–706.
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 129-140.
Wheeler, P. R.& Arunachalam, V. (2008). The effects of decision aid design on the information search strategies and confirmation bias of tax professionals. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1): 131–145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.40019
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 5640 | views : 3831Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business |
The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |
© 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business | Visitor Statistics |