Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, Statistical Index, Index of Enthropy, and Logistic Regression Approaches in the TinalahWatershed, Yogyakarta

I Gde Budi Indrawan; Tee Xiong; Doni Prakasa Eka Putra

doi:10.22146/jag.39983

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, Statistical Index, Index of Enthropy, and Logistic Regression Approaches in the TinalahWatershed, Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.22146/jag.39983

I Gde Budi Indrawan^(1*), Tee Xiong⁽²⁾, Doni Prakasa Eka Putra⁽³⁾

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

A number of approaches have been used inlandslide susceptibility mapping
and there seems to be no agreement on which approach provides best prediction of landslide susceptibility. This study was conducted to develop landslide susceptibility mapsof the Tinalah watershed at a 1:25000 scale using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), statistical index (SI), index of entropy (IOE) and logistic regression (LR) approaches and to compare performance of those approaches in predicting landslide susceptibility. Out of 114 landslides identified during site investigation, 86 landslides were selected for landslide susceptibility analyses, while the remaining 28 landslides were used to verify the results. Factors controlling landslides considered in the landslide susceptibility mapping were slope inclination, lithology, distance to fault, land use, distance to river, and rainfall. Analyses of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves showed that the AUC values of the landslide susceptibility maps derived using AHP, SI, IOE and LR approaches were 0.784, 0.688, 0.827 and 0.834, respectively. The LR approach was concluded to perform the best in predicting landslide susceptibility in the study area.

Keywords

Analytical hierarchy process - Index of entropy - Landslide susceptibility - Logistic regression - Statistical index.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbari, A., Yahaya, F. B., Azamirad, M., Fanod, M. (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression analysis and GIS, EJGE, 19.

Aleotti, P., Chowdhury, R. (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 58.

Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H. (2005) The application of GIS based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping, Geomorphology, 65.

Devkota, K. C., Regmi, A. D., Pourghasemi, H. R., Yoshida, K., Pradhan, B., Ryu, I. C., Dhital, M. R. (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic re- gression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road, Nat Hazards, 65.

Glade, T., Crozrier, M. J. (2005). A review of scale dependency in landslide hazard and risk analysis. Landslide Hazard and Risk, Wiley.

Jaafari, A., Najafi, A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Rezaeian, J., Sattarian, A. (2014) GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol,11, 4.

Kavzoglu, T., Sahin, E. K., Colkesen, I. (2015) An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district, Nat Hazards, 76.

Lee, E. M., and Jones, D. K. (2004) Landslide risk assessment, Thomas Telford, London.

Lee, S., Pradhan, B. (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models, Landslides, 4.

Mancini, F., Ceppi, C., Ritrovato, G. (2010) GIS and statistical analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Daunia area, Italy, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10.

Pourghasemi, H. R., Moradi, H. R., Aghda, S. M. (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical, Nat Hazards 69, 1.

Prabin, K. (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping and hazard assessment in the Nepal Himalaya.

Pradhan, B. (2010) Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with Geo-information techniques to landslide susceptibility mapping and their comparison with logistic regression modelling, Environ Eco Stat,18, 3.

Rahardjo, W, Sukandarrumini, and Rosidi, H.M.S. (1995) Geological Map of Yogyakarta Sheet, Java, Geological Research and Development Centre.

Saaty, T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York.

Shahabi, H., Ahmad, B., Kezri, S. (2013) Evaluation and comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping (case study: Zab Basin), Arab J Geosci, 6.

Wang, Q., Li, W., Chen, W., Bai, H. (2015) GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility using certainty factor and index of entropy models for the Qianyang County of Baoji city, China, J. EarthSyst. Sci. 124, 7.

Wang, Q., Li, W., Wu, Y., Pei, Y., Xie, P. (2016) Application of statistical index and index of entropy methods to landslide susceptibility assessment in Gongliu (Xinjiang, China), Environ Earth Sci., 75.

Yalcin, A. (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations, Catena, 72.

Yesilnacar, E., Topal, T. (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparason of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey), Engineering Geology, 3-4.

Youssef, A. M., Pradhan, B., Jebur, M. N., El-Harbi, H. M. (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabia, Environ Earth Sci, 73.

Van Den Eckhaut, M., Vanwalleghem, T., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Vandekerchove, L. (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case study in the Flemish Ardennes, Geomorphology, 76, 3-4.

Van Westen, C. J. (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis, ILWIS 2.1 for Windows application guide, ITC Publication, Enschede.

Voogd, H. (1983) Multi criteria evaluation for urban and regional planning, Pion, London. Journal of Applied Geology 79.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jag.39983